What do you feel if I apply transcranial electric stimulation? Safety, sensations and secondary induced effects

被引:288
作者
Fertonani, Anna [1 ]
Ferrari, Clarissa [2 ]
Miniussi, Carlo [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] IRCCS Ctr San Giovanni Dio Fatebenefratelli, Cognit Neurosci Sect, Via Pilastroni 4, I-25125 Brescia, Italy
[2] IRCCS Ctr San Giovanni Dio Fatebenefratelli, Stat Serv, I-25125 Brescia, Italy
[3] Univ Brescia, Dept Clin & Expt Sci, Neurosci Sect, Brescia, Italy
关键词
tES; Questionnaire; Sensations; Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS); Transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS); Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS); NONINVASIVE BRAIN-STIMULATION; MOTOR CORTEX; DC STIMULATION; PERCEPTION; TDCS; INDUCTION; EXCITABILITY; INHIBITION; PLASTICITY; COMFORT;
D O I
10.1016/j.clinph.2015.03.015
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: The goals of this work are to report data regarding a large number of stimulation sessions and to use model analyses to explain the similarities or differences in the sensations induced by different parameters of tES application. Methods: We analysed sensation data relative to 693 different tES sessions. In particular, we studied the effects on sensations induced by different types of current, categories of polarity and frequency, different timing, levels of current density and intensity, different electrode sizes and different electrode locations (areas). Results: The application of random or fixed alternating current stimulation (i.e., tRNS and tACS) over the scalp induced less sensation compared with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), regardless of the application parameters. Moreover, anodal tDCS induced more annoyance in comparison to other tES. Additionally, larger electrodes induced stronger sensations compared with smaller electrodes, and higher intensities were more strongly perceived. Timing of stimulation, montage and current density did not influence sensations perception. The analyses demonstrated that the induced sensations could be clustered on the basis of the type of somatosensory system activated. Finally and most important no adverse events were reported. Conclusion: Induced sensations are modulated by electrode size and intensity and mainly pertain to the cutaneous receptor activity of the somatosensory system. Moreover, the procedure currently used to perform placebo stimulation may not be totally effective when compared with anodal tDCS. Significance: The reported observations enrich the literature regarding the safety aspects of tES, confirming that it is a painless and safe technique. (C) 2015 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2181 / 2188
页数:8
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   The fade-in - Short stimulation - Fade out approach to sham tDCS - Reliable at 1 mA for naive and experienced subjects, but not investigators [J].
Ambrus, Geza Gergely ;
Al-Moyed, Hanan ;
Chaieb, Leila ;
Sarp, Lena ;
Antal, Andrea ;
Paulus, Walter .
BRAIN STIMULATION, 2012, 5 (04) :499-504
[2]   Comparing cutaneous perception induced by electrical stimulation using rectangular and round shaped electrodes [J].
Ambrus, Geza Gergely ;
Antal, Andrea ;
Paulus, Walter .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2011, 122 (04) :803-807
[3]   Cutaneous perception thresholds of electrical stimulation methods: Comparison of tDCS and tRNS [J].
Ambrus, Geza Gergely ;
Paulus, Walter ;
Antal, Andrea .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2010, 121 (11) :1908-1914
[4]   Differential effects of motor cortical excitability and plasticity in young and old individuals: a Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) study [J].
Bashir, Shahid ;
Perez, Jennifer M. ;
Horvath, Jared C. ;
Pena-Gomez, Cleofe ;
Vernet, Marine ;
Capia, Anuhya ;
Alonso-Alonso, Miguel ;
Pascual-Leone, Alvaro .
FRONTIERS IN AGING NEUROSCIENCE, 2014, 6
[5]   Partially non-linear stimulation intensity-dependent effects of direct current stimulation on motor cortex excitability in humans [J].
Batsikadze, G. ;
Moliadze, V. ;
Paulus, W. ;
Kuo, M. -F. ;
Nitsche, M. A. .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 2013, 591 (07) :1987-2000
[6]   Placebo Effects: From the Neurobiological Paradigm to Translational Implications [J].
Benedetti, Fabrizio .
NEURON, 2014, 84 (03) :623-637
[7]   Understanding the behavioural consequences of noninvasive brain stimulation [J].
Bestmann, Sven ;
de Berker, Archy O. ;
Bonaiuto, James .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2015, 19 (01) :13-20
[8]   The Interaction With Task-induced Activity is More Important Than Polarization: A tDCS Study [J].
Bortoletto, Marta ;
Pellicciari, Maria Concetta ;
Rodella, Claudia ;
Miniussi, Carlo .
BRAIN STIMULATION, 2015, 8 (02) :269-276
[9]   Is Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Effective in Modulating Brain Oscillations? [J].
Brignani, Debora ;
Ruzzoli, Manuela ;
Mauri, Piercarlo ;
Miniussi, Carlo .
PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (02)
[10]   Clinical research with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): Challenges and future directions [J].
Brunoni, Andre Russowsky ;
Nitsche, Michael A. ;
Bolognini, Nadia ;
Bikson, Marom ;
Wagner, Tim ;
Merabet, Lotfi ;
Edwards, Dylan J. ;
Valero-Cabre, Antoni ;
Rotenberg, Alexander ;
Pascual-Leone, Alvaro ;
Ferrucci, Roberta ;
Priori, Alberto ;
Boggio, Paulo Sergio ;
Fregni, Felipe .
BRAIN STIMULATION, 2012, 5 (03) :175-195