Comparison of Two In Vitro Extraction Protocols for Assessing Metals' Bioaccessibility Using Dust and Soil Reference Materials

被引:21
作者
Dodd, Matt [1 ]
Rasmussen, Pat E. [2 ]
Chenier, Marc [2 ]
机构
[1] Royal Rd Univ, Victoria, BC V9B 5Y2, Canada
[2] Hlth Canada, Environm Hlth Sci & Res Bur, Ottawa, ON K1A 0L2, Canada
来源
HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT | 2013年 / 19卷 / 04期
关键词
bioaccessibility; metals; dust; SBRC; EN-71; RELATIVE BIOAVAILABILITY; LEAD BIOACCESSIBILITY; INDOOR DUST; CONTAMINANTS; SPECIATION; LIQUID; RATIOS;
D O I
10.1080/10807039.2012.719381
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
The bioaccessibility of arsenic, cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, nickel, and zinc in four National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) standard reference materials and two Canadian dust samples as determined using the Solubility/Bioavailability Research Consortium (SBRC) in vitro procedure ranged from a low of 1.8% for chromium in standard reference material NIST 2711 to a high of 95.2% for cadmium in NIST 2584. The SBRC data were compared to data generated using a modified EN-71 Toy Safety protocol conducted at two different laboratories. Results for the two extraction methods compared well with differences between the means (SBRC vs. modified EN-71) generally less than 10% for the majority of the metals. These differences between the two extraction methods were negligible compared to variability caused by (a) the inherent heterogeneity of typical house dust samples and (b) differences in ICP-MS analytical approaches employed in the different laboratories. Results indicate that the modified EN-71 method is useful and appropriate as a relatively simple, rapid, and reproducible screening test for estimating metals' bioaccessibility in soil and dust samples.
引用
收藏
页码:1014 / 1027
页数:14
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1995, EN71 EUR COM STAND
[2]   Relative Bioavailability and Bioaccessibility and Speciation of Arsenic in Contaminated Soils [J].
Bradham, Karen D. ;
Scheckel, Kirk G. ;
Nelson, Clay M. ;
Seales, Paul E. ;
Lee, Grace E. ;
Hughes, Michael F. ;
Miller, Bradley W. ;
Yeow, Aaron ;
Gilmore, Thomas ;
Serda, Sophia M. ;
Harper, Sharon ;
Thomas, David J. .
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2011, 119 (11) :1629-1634
[3]   An in vitro procedure for estimation of lead relative bioavailability:: With validation [J].
Drexler, J. W. ;
Brattin, W. J. .
HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT, 2007, 13 (02) :383-401
[4]  
Federal Contaminated Sites Inventory, 2011, FEDERAL CONTAMINATED
[5]   Bioaccessibility of metals in soils for different liquid to solid ratios in synthetic gastric fluid [J].
Hamel, SC ;
Buckley, B ;
Lioy, PJ .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 1998, 32 (03) :358-362
[6]   Assessment of Four Commonly Employed in Vitro Arsenic Bioaccessibility Assays for Predicting in Vivo Relative Arsenic Bioavailability in Contaminated Soils [J].
Juhasz, Albert L. ;
Weber, John ;
Smith, Euan ;
Naidu, Ravi ;
Rees, Matthew ;
Rofe, Allan ;
Kuchel, Tim ;
Sansom, Lloyd .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 43 (24) :9487-9494
[7]  
Kelly M.E., 2002, Assessing Oral Bioavailability of Metals in Soil
[8]   Bioaccessible and quasi-total metals in soil and indoor dust [J].
Le Bot, Barbara ;
Gilles, Erwann ;
Durand, Severine ;
Glorennec, Philippe .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MINERALOGY, 2010, 22 (05) :651-657
[9]   Comparison of five in vitro digestion models to study the bioaccessibility of soil contaminants [J].
Oomen, AG ;
Hack, A ;
Minekus, M ;
Zeijdner, E ;
Cornelis, C ;
Schoeters, G ;
Verstraete, W ;
Van de Wiele, T ;
Wragg, J ;
Rompelberg, CJM ;
Sips, AJAM ;
Van Wijnen, JH .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2002, 36 (15) :3326-3334
[10]   Influence of matrix composition on the bioaccessibility of copper, zinc, and nickel in urban residential dust and soil [J].
Rasmussen, Pat E. ;
Beauchemin, Suzanne ;
Nugent, Michelle ;
Dugandzic, Rose ;
Lanouette, Monique ;
Chenier, Marc .
HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT, 2008, 14 (02) :351-371