Combining prostate-specific antigen density with prostate imaging reporting and data system score version 2.1 to improve detection of clinically significant prostate cancer: A retrospective study

被引:4
作者
Lei, Yin [1 ]
Li, Tian Jie [2 ]
Gu, Peng [3 ]
Yang, Yu Kun [4 ]
Zhao, Lei [5 ]
Gao, Chao [5 ]
Hu, Juan [5 ]
Liu, Xiao Dong [3 ]
机构
[1] First Peoples Hosp Shuangliu Dist, Dept Urol, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[2] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Clin Med, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Kunming Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Urol, Kunming, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Elect Sci & Technol China, Med Sch, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[5] Kunming Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Med Imaging Dept, Kunming, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
prostate biopsy; prostate cancer; prostate imaging reporting and data system score; prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD); clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa); PI-RADS V2; PSA-DENSITY; GLEASON SCORE; BIOPSY; MRI; METAANALYSIS; ACCURACY; PREDICT; CUTOFF; MEN;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2022.992032
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Globally, Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second most common cancer in the male population worldwide, but clinically significant prostate cancer (CSPCa) is more aggressive and causes to more deaths. The authors aimed to construct the risk category based on Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System score version 2.1 (PI-RADS v2.1) in combination with Prostate-Specific Antigen Density (PSAD) to improve CSPCa detection and avoid unnecessary biopsy. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression and receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves were performed to compare the efficacy of the different predictors. The results revealed that PI-RADS v2.1 score and PSAD were independent predictors for CSPCa. Moreover, the combined factor shows a significantly higher predictive value than each single variable for the diagnosis of CSPCa. According to the risk stratification model constructed based on PI-RADS v2.1 score and PSAD, patients with PI-RADS v2.1 score of <= 2, or PI-RADS V2.1 score of 3 and PSA density of <0.15 ng/mL(2), can avoid unnecessary of prostate biopsy and does not miss clinically significant prostate cancer.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study [J].
Ahmed, Hashim U. ;
Bosaily, Ahmed El-Shater ;
Brown, Louise C. ;
Gabe, Rhian ;
Kaplan, Richard ;
Parmar, Mahesh K. ;
Collaco-Moraes, Yolanda ;
Ward, Katie ;
Hindley, Richard G. ;
Freeman, Alex ;
Kirkham, Alex P. ;
Oldroyd, Robert ;
Parker, Chris ;
Emberton, Mark .
LANCET, 2017, 389 (10071) :815-822
[2]  
Bray F, 2018, CA-CANCER J CLIN, V68, P394, DOI [10.3322/caac.21492, 10.3322/caac.21609]
[3]   The detection of significant prostate cancer is correlated with the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) in MRI/transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsy [J].
Cash, Hannes ;
Maxeiner, Andreas ;
Stephan, Carsten ;
Fischer, Thomas ;
Durmus, Tahir ;
Holzmann, Josephine ;
Asbach, Patrick ;
Haas, Matthias ;
Hinz, Stefan ;
Neymeyer, Joerg ;
Miller, Kurt ;
Guenzel, Karsten ;
Kempkensteffen, Carsten .
WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 34 (04) :525-532
[4]  
[陈锐 Chen Rui], 2015, [中华泌尿外科杂志, Chinese Journal of Urology], V36, P342
[5]   The ability of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density to predict an upgrade in Gleason score between initial prostate biopsy and prostatectomy diminishes with increasing tumour grade due to reduced PSA secretion per unit tumour volume [J].
Corcoran, Niall M. ;
Casey, Rowan G. ;
Hong, Matthew K. H. ;
Pedersen, John ;
Connolly, Stephen ;
Peters, Justin ;
Harewood, Laurence ;
Gleave, Martin E. ;
Costello, Anthony J. ;
Hovens, Chris M. ;
Goldenberg, S. Larry .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 110 (01) :36-42
[6]   PSA-density does not improve bi-parametric prostate MR detection of prostate cancer in a biopsy naive patient population [J].
Cuocolo, Renato ;
Stanzione, Arnaldo ;
Rusconi, Giovanni ;
Petretta, Mario ;
Ponsiglione, Andrea ;
Fusco, Ferdinando ;
Longo, Nicola ;
Persico, Francesco ;
Cocozza, Sirio ;
Brunetti, Arturo ;
Imbriaco, Massimo .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2018, 104 :64-70
[7]   The Value of PSA Density in Combination with PI-RADS™ for the Accuracy of Prostate Cancer Prediction [J].
Distler, Florian A. ;
Radtke, Jan P. ;
Bonekamp, David ;
Kesch, Claudia ;
Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter ;
Wieczorek, Kathrin ;
Kirchner, Marietta ;
Pahernik, Sascha ;
Hohenfellner, Markus ;
Hadaschikk, Boris A. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 198 (03) :575-582
[8]   Interreader Agreement of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 Using an In-Bore MRI-Guided Prostate Biopsy Cohort: A Single Institution's Initial Experience [J].
Glazer, Daniel I. ;
Mayo-Smith, William W. ;
Sainani, Nisha I. ;
Sadow, Cheryl A. ;
Vangel, Mark G. ;
Tempany, Clare M. ;
Dunne, Ruth M. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2017, 209 (03) :W145-W151
[9]   Prostate-specific Antigen Density Toward a Better Cutoff to Identify Better Candidates for Active Surveillance [J].
Ha, Yun-Sok ;
Yu, Jihyeong ;
Salmasi, Amirali Hassanzadeh ;
Patel, Neal ;
Parihar, Jaspreet ;
Singer, Eric A. ;
Kim, Jeong Hyun ;
Kwon, Tae Gyun ;
Kim, Wun-Jae ;
Kim, Isaac Yi .
UROLOGY, 2014, 84 (02) :365-371
[10]   Evaluating the performance of PI-RADS v2 in the non-academic setting [J].
Jordan, Eric J. ;
Fiske, Charles ;
Zagoria, Ronald J. ;
Westphalen, Antonio C. .
ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2017, 42 (11) :2725-2731