Quantitative Comparison of Flux-Switching Permanent-Magnet Motors With Interior Permanent Magnet Motor for EV, HEV, and PHEV Applications

被引:263
作者
Cao, Ruiwu [1 ,2 ]
Mi, Chris [1 ]
Cheng, Ming [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Dearborn, MI 48128 USA
[2] Southeast Univ, Sch Elect Engn, Nanjing 210096, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
关键词
Comparative study; finite-element method (FEM); flux switching permanent magnet motor; HEV; hybrid electric vehicle; permanent-magnet motor; stator PM motor; FAULT-TOLERANT CONTROL; PM SYNCHRONOUS MOTOR; HYBRID; MACHINE; DESIGN; PERFORMANCE; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1109/TMAG.2012.2190614
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Permanent-magnet (PM) motors with both magnets and armature windings on the stator (stator PM motors) have attracted considerable attention due to their simple structure, robust configuration, high power density, easy heat dissipation, and suitability for high-speed operations. However, current PM motors in industrial, residential, and automotive applications are still dominated by interior permanent-magnet motors (IPM) because the claimed advantages of stator PM motors have not been fully investigated and validated. Hence, this paper will perform a comparative study between a stator-PM motor, namely, a flux switching PM motor (FSPM), and an IPM which has been used in the 2004 Prius hybrid electric vehicle (HEV). For a fair comparison, the two motors are designed at the same phase current, current density, and dimensions including the stator outer diameter and stack length. First, the Prius-IPM is investigated by means of finite-element method (FEM). The FEM results are then verified by experimental results to confirm the validity of the methods used in this study. Second, the FSPM design is optimized and investigated based on the same method used for the Prius-IPM. Third, the electromagnetic performance and the material mass of the two motors are compared. It is concluded that FSPM has more sinusoidal back-EMF hence is more suitable for BLAC control. It also offers the advantage of smaller torque ripple and better mechanical integrity for safer and smoother operations. But the FSPM has disadvantages such as low magnet utilization ratio and high cost. It may not be able to compete with IPM in automotive and other applications where cost constraints are tight.
引用
收藏
页码:2374 / 2384
页数:11
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1997, PROC EUR C POWER ELE
[2]  
Bianchi N, 1996, IEEE POWER ELECTRON, P1542, DOI 10.1109/PESC.1996.548786
[3]  
BIANCHI N, 2004, IEEE IAS TUTORIAL CO
[4]  
Chan C.C., 2001, Modern Electric Vehicle Technology
[5]   An overview of power electronics in electric vehicles [J].
Chan, CC ;
Chau, KT .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS, 1997, 44 (01) :3-13
[6]   Emerging energy-efficient technologies for hybrid electric vehicles [J].
Chau, K. T. ;
Chan, C. C. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE, 2007, 95 (04) :821-835
[7]   A Novel E-Core Switched-Flux PM Brushless AC Machine [J].
Chen, J. T. ;
Zhu, Z. Q. ;
Iwasaki, S. ;
Deodhar, Rajesh P. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRY APPLICATIONS, 2011, 47 (03) :1273-1282
[8]   Overview of Stator-Permanent Magnet Brushless Machines [J].
Cheng, Ming ;
Hua, Wei ;
Zhang, Jianzhong ;
Zhao, Wenxiang .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS, 2011, 58 (11) :5087-5101
[9]  
Deodhar RP, 1996, IEEE IND APPLIC SOC, P786, DOI 10.1109/IAS.1996.560174
[10]  
Dorrell DG, 2010, PROC IEEE INT SYMP, P3728, DOI 10.1109/ISIE.2010.5638002