Is grip strength associated with health-related quality of life? - Findings from the Hertfordshire Cohort Study

被引:263
作者
Sayer, Avan Aihie [1 ]
Syddall, Holly E.
Martin, Helen J.
Dennison, Elaine M.
Roberts, Helen C.
Cooper, Cyrus
机构
[1] Univ Southampton, MRC, Epidemiol Resource Ctr, Southampton SO9 5NH, Hants, England
[2] Univ Southampton, Dept Geriatr Med, Southampton SO9 5NH, Hants, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
grip strength; sarcopaenia; frailty; quality of life; SF-36; elderly;
D O I
10.1093/ageing/afl024
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Objective: to investigate the relationship between grip strength and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Design: cross-sectional survey within a cohort study design. Setting: the county of Hertfordshire in the UK. Participants: a total of 2,987 community-dwelling men and women aged 59 - 73 years of age. Measurements: grip strength was used as a marker of sarcopaenia and measured using a Jamar dynamometer. HRQoL was assessed using the eight domain scores of the Short Form-36 (SF-36) questionnaire, and subjects in the lowest sex-specific fifth of the distribution were classified as having 'poor' status for each domain. Results: men and women with lower grip strength were significantly more likely to report a poor as opposed to excellent to fair overall opinion of their general health (GH) [odds ratio (OR) per kilogram decrease in grip strength = 1.13, 95% CI = 1.06 - 1.19, P < 0.001 in men, 1.13, 95% CI = 1.07 - 1.20, P < 0.001 in women]. Among men, after adjustment for age, size, physical activity and known co-morbidity, decreased grip strength was associated with increased prevalence of poor SF-36 scores for the physical functioning (PF) ( OR per kilogram decrease in grip strength = 1.03, 95% CI = 1.01 - 1.06, P = 0.007) and GH domains ( OR = 1.03, 95% CI = 1.01 - 1.05, P = 0.01). Similar associations were seen in women. Conclusions: our findings suggest that lower grip strength is associated with reduced HRQoL in older men and women. This does not appear to be explained by age, size, physical activity or co-morbidity and may reflect the link between sarcopaenia and generalised frailty. Individuals with sarcopaenia may benefit from interventions to improve muscle mass and strength before the onset of chronic disorders usually associated with impaired HRQoL.
引用
收藏
页码:409 / 415
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Longitudinal changes in selected physical capabilities: muscle strength, flexibility and body size [J].
Bassey, EJ .
AGE AND AGEING, 1998, 27 :12-16
[2]   FACTORS AFFECTING WALKING SPEED OF ELDERLY PEOPLE [J].
BENDALL, MJ ;
BASSEY, EJ ;
PEARSON, MB .
AGE AND AGEING, 1989, 18 (05) :327-332
[3]  
Bowling A., 1997, MEASURING HLTH REV Q, V2nd
[4]   VALIDATING THE SF-36 HEALTH SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE - NEW OUTCOME MEASURE FOR PRIMARY CARE [J].
BRAZIER, JE ;
HARPER, R ;
JONES, NMB ;
OCATHAIN, A ;
THOMAS, KJ ;
USHERWOOD, T ;
WESTLAKE, L .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1992, 305 (6846) :160-164
[5]   Prospective study of the impact of fear of falling on activities of daily living, SF-36 scores, and nursing home admission [J].
Cumming, RG ;
Salkeld, G ;
Thomas, M ;
Szonyi, G .
JOURNALS OF GERONTOLOGY SERIES A-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2000, 55 (05) :M299-M305
[6]   Designing randomized, controlled trials aimed at preventing or delaying functional decline and disability in frail, older persons: A consensus report [J].
Ferrucci, L ;
Guralnik, JM ;
Studenski, S ;
Fried, LP ;
Cutler, GB ;
Walston, JD .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2004, 52 (04) :625-634
[7]  
FREDERIKSEN H, 2006, ANN EPIDEMIOL 0105
[8]  
Gavin JR, 1997, DIABETES CARE, V20, P1183
[9]   Prevalence of sarcopenia and predictors of skeletal muscle mass in healthy, older men and women [J].
Iannuzzi-Sucich, M ;
Prestwood, KM ;
Kenny, AM .
JOURNALS OF GERONTOLOGY SERIES A-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2002, 57 (12) :M772-M777
[10]   The healthcare costs of sarcopenia in the United States [J].
Janssen, I ;
Shepard, DS ;
Katzmarzyk, PT ;
Roubenoff, R .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2004, 52 (01) :80-85