Comparison of Routing Algorithms with Static and Dynamic Link Cost in SDN

被引:10
作者
Akin, Erdal [1 ]
Korkmaz, Turgay [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78249 USA
来源
2019 16TH IEEE ANNUAL CONSUMER COMMUNICATIONS & NETWORKING CONFERENCE (CCNC) | 2019年
关键词
Routing Algorithms; Minimum interference routing; SDN; Software Defined Networking; Traffic Engineering;
D O I
10.1109/ccnc.2019.8651815
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
There are several routing algorithms that can be used in the context of Software Defined Networking (SDN), where a logically centralized controller obtains the global view of the network and network state information, makes the routing decisions, and installs them to the switches in the selected paths. Comparing the performance of the existing routing algorithms under realistic simulation scenarios and understanding the factors that impact their performance are very important for their adaption in practice. Accordingly, we implemented several existing routing algorithms using RYU SDN controller and evaluated their performance on Mininet emulator. We considered three categories of Routing Algorithms with Static Link Cost (RA-SLC), Dynamic Link Cost (RA-DLC), and Dynamic Link cost with Minimum Interference (RA-DLCMI) under both the idealistic case assuming the availability of accurate network state information (NSI) and the practical case where the NSI is collected periodically and has some inaccuracy. Our experimental results showed that both RA-DLC and RA-DLCMI outperformed RA-SLC in terms of throughput and the number of accepted flows while there was no significant difference between RA-DLC and RA-DLCMI. We also observed that periodic collections caused inaccuracies in NSI and negatively affected the performance of all algorithms.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
Akin Erdal, 2017, 2017 International Conference on Computing, Networking and Communications (ICNC), P831, DOI 10.1109/ICCNC.2017.7876239
[2]  
[Anonymous], COMP BAS SOFTW DEF N
[3]  
[Anonymous], COMM 2004 IEEE INT C
[4]  
[Anonymous], INTERNETWORKING CON
[5]  
Azzouni A., 2017, Limitations of openflow topology discovery protocol, P1, DOI DOI 10.1109/MEDHOCNET.2017.8001642
[6]   Ethane: Taking control of the enterprise [J].
Casado, Martin ;
Freedman, Michael J. ;
Pettit, Justin ;
Luo, Jianying ;
McKeown, Nick ;
Shenker, Scott .
ACM SIGCOMM COMPUTER COMMUNICATION REVIEW, 2007, 37 (04) :1-12
[7]   An overview of quality of service routing for next-generation high-speed networks: Problems and solutions [J].
Chen, SG ;
Nahrstedt, K .
IEEE NETWORK, 1998, 12 (06) :64-79
[8]  
Crawley E, 1998, A framework for qos-based routing in the internet
[9]   A minimum interference routing algorithm with reduced computational complexity [J].
Figueiredo, Gustavo B. ;
da Fonseca, Nelson L. S. ;
Monteiro, Jose A. S. .
COMPUTER NETWORKS, 2006, 50 (11) :1710-1732
[10]   ALGORITHM-97 - SHORTEST PATH [J].
FLOYD, RW .
COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 1962, 5 (06) :345-345