Neoatherosclerosis 5 Years After Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold Implantation

被引:41
|
作者
Moriyama, Noriaki [1 ]
Shishido, Koki [1 ]
Tanaka, Yutaka [1 ]
Yokota, Shohei [1 ]
Hayashi, Takahiro [1 ]
Miyashita, Hirokazu [1 ]
Koike, Tatsuya [1 ]
Yokoyama, Hiroaki [1 ]
Takada, Takuma [1 ]
Nishimoto, Takashi [1 ]
Ochiai, Tomoki [1 ]
Tobita, Kazuki [1 ]
Yamanaka, Futoshi [1 ]
Mizuno, Shingo [1 ]
Murakami, Masato [1 ]
Takahashi, Saeko [1 ]
Saito, Shigeru [1 ]
机构
[1] Shonan Kamakura Gen Hosp, Dept Cardiol & Catheterizat Labs, 1370-1 Okamoto, Kamakura, Kanagawa 2478533, Japan
关键词
bioresorbable vascular scaffold; neoatherosclerosis; optical coherence tomography; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; EVEROLIMUS-ELUTING STENT; 5-YEAR FOLLOW-UP; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; SERIAL ASSESSMENT; METALLIC STENTS; ABSORB; TRIAL; NEOVASCULARIZATION; CALCIFICATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jacc.2018.02.051
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Data regarding neoatherosclerosis after everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) (ABSORB BVS Rev. 1.1, Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, California) implantation are limited. OBJECTIVES This study investigated the findings of neoatherosclerosis at 5 years after BVS 1.1 implantation by using multi-imaging modalities, including optical coherence tomography (OCT). METHODS Patients included in the ABSORB EXTEND (ABSORB EXTEND Clinical Investigation) trial at Shonan Kamakura General Hospital underwent OCT at baseline after the index procedure and at 1 and 5 years. Intimal plaque distributions in the in-scaffold and out-scaffold segments were analyzed. RESULTS Twenty patients (22 lesions) with stable angina pectoris were enrolled. The median follow-up duration was 67 months (interquartile range: 65 to 69months), and the mean age was 69 +/- 8 years. Patients with diabetes mellitus (25%) were included. Based on the baseline angiogram, 10 (46%) lesions were type B2/C lesions. At 1 and 5 years of follow-up, significant differences in the prevalence of in-scaffold lipid-laden neointima (17% vs. 61%; p = 0.04), calcification (28% vs. 94%; p < 0.01), neovascularization (6% vs. 78%; p < 0.01), and thin-cap fibroatheroma (0% vs. 22%; p = 0.02) were found. In the out-scaffold segments, no significant difference in the plaque prevalence between 1 and 5 years was noted. CONCLUSIONS The occurrence and progression of in-scaffold neoatherosclerosis with luminal narrowing was observed at 5 years after BVS 1.1 implantation. The small size of the current study warrants confirmation in larger study. (ABSORB EXTEND Clinical Investigation [ABSORB EXTEND]; NCT01023789) (C) 2018 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.
引用
收藏
页码:1882 / 1893
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] What is better for predilatation in bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation: a non-compliant or a compliant balloon?
    Ozel, Erdem
    Tastan, Ahmet
    Ozturk, Ali
    Ozcan, Emin Evren
    Uyar, Samet
    Senarslan, Omer
    ANATOLIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 16 (04) : 244 - 249
  • [22] Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold Implantation To Whom and How?
    Sabate, Manel
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2017, 10 (18) : 1865 - 1866
  • [23] Feasibility of second-generation bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation in complex anatomical and clinical scenarios
    Jaguszewski, Milosz
    Ghadri, Jelena-Rima
    Zipponi, Manuel
    Bataiosu, Dana Roxana
    Diekmann, Johanna
    Geyer, Verena
    Neumann, Catharina Anna
    Huber, Mia Aurelia
    Hagl, Christian
    Erne, Paul
    Luescher, Thomas F.
    Templin, Christian
    CLINICAL RESEARCH IN CARDIOLOGY, 2015, 104 (02) : 124 - 135
  • [24] Bioresorbable vascular scaffold fracture in the overlapping zone as cause of accelerated neoatherosclerosis and in-scaffold very-late thrombosis
    Mangiameli, Andrea
    Fajadet, Jean
    Dumonteil, Nicolas
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2017, 33 (01) : 1 - 3
  • [25] Routine use of optical coherence tomography in bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation: insights on technique optimization and long-term outcomes
    Abdelaziz, Hesham K.
    Abuomara, Hossamaldin Z.
    Ali, Montasir H.
    Eichhofer, Jonas
    Patel, Billal
    Saad, Marwan
    CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE, 2019, 30 (04) : 263 - 269
  • [26] Bioresorbable vascular scaffold fracture in the overlapping zone as cause of accelerated neoatherosclerosis and in-scaffold very-late thrombosis
    Andrea Mangiameli
    Jean Fajadet
    Nicolas Dumonteil
    The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, 2017, 33 : 1 - 3
  • [27] Angiographic and Midterm Outcomes of Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold for Coronary Bifurcation Lesions
    Paradies, Valeria
    Vlachojannis, Georgios J.
    Royaards, Kees-Jan
    Wassing, Jochem
    van der Ent, Martin
    Smits, Pieter C.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 122 (12) : 2035 - 2042
  • [28] Association between inflammatory biomarkers and neointimal response following elective implantation of the ABSORB bioresorbable vascular scaffold
    Rampat, Rajiv
    Williams, Timothy
    Mayo, Thomas
    Mengozzi, Manuela
    Ghezzi, Pietro
    Hildick-Smith, David
    Cockburn, James
    CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE, 2019, 30 (03) : 183 - 187
  • [29] Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold outcomes following implantation with routine intravascular imaging guidance
    Costantini, Costantino R.
    Denk, Marcos A.
    De Macedo, Rafael M.
    Tarbine, Sergio G.
    Santos, Marcelo F.
    Luize, Marcio M.
    Folador, Joao C.
    Costantini, Costantino O.
    Stone, Gregg W.
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2021, 97 (01) : 48 - 55
  • [30] Side branch occlusion after bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation: Thickness of the scaffold or large plaque burden? Another building block in the comprehension of this complication
    Piraino, Davide
    Cortese, Bernardo
    Buccheri, Dario
    Andolina, Giuseppe
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 207 : 37 - 38