Strategies for finding the design point in non-linear finite element reliability analysis

被引:73
作者
Haukaas, Terje
Kiureghian, Armen Der
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Dept Civil Engn, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
[2] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
structural reliability; finite elements; non-linear analysis; response sensitivity; optimization algorithms; smooth material models;
D O I
10.1016/j.probengmech.2005.07.005
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
An essential step in FORM, SORM and importance sampling reliability methods is the determination of the so-called design point. This point is the solution of a constrained optimization problem in the outcome space of the random variables, which is commonly solved by an iterative, gradient-based search algorithm. In solving this problem in the context of non-linear finite element reliability analysis, two serious impediments are encountered: (a) for certain material models, the constraint function may have a discontinuous gradient, leading to failure of the search algorithm to converge. (b) The search algorithm may generate trial points too far in the failure domain, where the finite element code fails to produce a result due to lack of numerical convergence. In this paper, remedying strategies are developed for both impediments. The first impediment is addressed by using smooth or smoothed material models, including a smoothed bi-linear model, a Bouc-Wen model and a generalized plasticity model. This is complemented by a proof that sudden elastic unloading does not give rise to gradient discontinuities. The second impediment is addressed by modifying or introducing search algorithms that prevent the trial points from overshooting into the failure domain. Numerical examples are used to demonstrate the two impediments and effectiveness of the proposed remedies. (C) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:133 / 147
页数:15
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], OPEN SYSTEM EARTHQUA
[2]   METHODS OF DESIGN SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS IN STRUCTURAL OPTIMIZATION [J].
ARORA, JS ;
HAUG, EJ .
AIAA JOURNAL, 1979, 17 (09) :970-974
[3]   RANDOM VIBRATION OF DEGRADING, PINCHING SYSTEMS [J].
BABER, TT ;
NOORI, MN .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MECHANICS-ASCE, 1985, 111 (08) :1010-1026
[4]  
BOUC R, 1971, ACUSTICA, V24, P16
[5]  
CONTE JP, 2000, P CIN US MILL S EART
[6]  
Ditlevsen O., 1996, Structural reliability methods
[7]   RESPONSE-SURFACE APPROACH FOR RELIABILITY-ANALYSIS [J].
FARAVELLI, L .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MECHANICS-ASCE, 1989, 115 (12) :2763-2781
[8]  
HASOFER AM, 1974, J ENG MECH DIV-ASCE, V100, P111
[9]  
HAUKAAS T, IN PRESS J ENG MECH
[10]  
HAUKAAS T, 2004, 200314 PEER U CAL