Staff Doses in Interventional Radiology: A National Survey

被引:46
作者
Mariano Sanchez, Roberto [1 ]
Vano, Eliseo [1 ,2 ]
Fernandez, Jose M. [1 ,2 ]
Rosales, Francisco [4 ]
Sotil, Jesus [5 ]
Carrera, Francisco [6 ]
Garcia, Maria A. [7 ]
Soler, Maria M. [8 ]
Hernandez-Armas, Jose [9 ]
Martinez, Luis C. [3 ]
Verdu, Jose F. [10 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Clin San Carlos, Inst Invest Sanitaria, Dept Med Phys, Madrid 28040, Spain
[2] Univ Complutense, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, E-28040 Madrid, Spain
[3] Hosp 12 Octubre, Dept Med Phys, E-28041 Madrid, Spain
[4] Hosp Basurto, Dept Med Phys, Bilbao, Spain
[5] Hosp Valle de Hebron, Dept Med Phys, Barcelona, Spain
[6] Hosp Juan Ramon Jimenez, Huelva, Spain
[7] Hosp Txagorritxu, Dept Med Phys, Vitoria, Spain
[8] Dept Med Phys, Cordoba, Spain
[9] Hosp Univ Canarias, Dept Med Phys, San Cristobal la Laguna, Spain
[10] Hosp Alicante, Dept Radiol, Alicante, Spain
关键词
RADIATION; DOSIMETRY; EXPOSURE; CARDIOLOGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jvir.2012.05.056
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To present the results of occupational radiation doses investigated through a national survey promoted by the National Society of Interventional Radiology in Spain. Materials and Methods: The monthly dosimetric records of 28 interventional radiologists from 10 hospitals were analyzed and filtered to remove inconsistent dosimeter readings. The evaluation of the results includes different workloads as well as different radiation protection habits. Results: Poor use of personal dosimetry by some interventional radiologists was brought to light. Most professionals do not use an over-apron dosimeter as recommended by the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Ceiling-suspended protective screens are used irregularly in many cases. All interventionalists perform digital subtraction angiographic imaging from a control room in more than 80% of procedures. The maximum monthly doses recorded were 3.8 mSv under the apron, 20.2 mSv over the apron, and 63.1 mSv to the hands. Conclusions: For under-apron and hand readings, extrapolated median values were below 30% of annual dose limits, but in the case of over-apron readings, the extrapolated median dose was higher than the newly recommended limit for the eye lens of 20 mSv per year. This study mainly highlights the need to use radiation protection tools and personal dosimeters to protect staff and monitor eye lens doses.
引用
收藏
页码:1496 / 1501
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1995, 122 NCRP
[2]   Risk for Radiation-Induced Cataract for Staff in Interventional Cardiology: Is There Reason for Concern? [J].
Ciraj-Bjelac, Olivera ;
Rehani, Madan M. ;
Sim, Kui Hian ;
Liew, Houng Bang ;
Vano, Eliseo ;
Kleiman, Norman J. .
CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2010, 76 (06) :826-834
[3]  
Consejo de Seguridad Nuclear, 2010, CONS SEG NUCL C DIP
[4]  
European Commission, PROP COUNC DIR LAYIN
[5]  
European Commission, 2012, RAD PROT 160 TECHN R
[6]   HAND DOSE MEASUREMENTS IN INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY [J].
FELMLEE, JP ;
MCGOUGH, PF ;
MORIN, RL ;
CLASSIC, KL .
HEALTH PHYSICS, 1991, 60 (02) :265-267
[7]  
ICRP, 2007, ANN ICRP, V103, P1
[8]  
ICRU, 1993, ICRU Report 51
[9]  
International Atomic Energy Agency, IAEA TRAIN RES REG T
[10]  
International Commission on Radiological Protection, 2000, ANN ICRP, V30, P2