The Supply Chain Effects of Bankruptcy

被引:114
作者
Yang, S. Alex [1 ]
Birge, John R. [2 ]
Parker, Rodney P. [2 ]
机构
[1] London Business Sch, London NW1 4SA, England
[2] Univ Chicago, Booth Sch Business, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
关键词
operations-finance interface; supply chain interaction; operational competitiveness; bankruptcy; Chapter; 11; reorganization; liquidation; externality; CAPITAL STRUCTURE; COMPETITION; FIRMS; COST; US;
D O I
10.1287/mnsc.2014.2079
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This paper examines how a firm's financial distress and the legal environment regarding the ease of bankruptcy reorganization can alter product market competition and supplier-buyer relationships. We identify three effects-predation, bail-out, and abetment-that can change firms' behavior from their actions in the absence of financial distress. The predation effect increases competition before potential bankruptcy as the nondistressed competitor behaves as if it has some first-mover advantage that could benefit a supplier with price control. The bail-out effect reflects the supplier's incentive to grant the distressed firm concessions to preserve competition, improving supply chain efficiency and providing support for the exclusivity rule in Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code when the supplier and the distressed firm are financially linked. The abetment effect is that the supplier may deliberately abet the competitor's predation, leading to increased operational disadvantages for the distressed firm before bankruptcy. Together these effects stress that a firm's bankruptcy potential can hurt its competitors and benefit its suppliers/customers. They also provide guidelines for firms' operational decisions in such situations, a rationale for observed firm actions surrounding bankruptcies, and motivation for policies supporting reorganization and relaxing broad enforcement of nondiscriminatory pricing regulations.
引用
收藏
页码:2320 / 2338
页数:19
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]  
Alan Yasin, 2015, WORKING PAPER
[2]   Intra-industry capital structure dispersion [J].
Almazan, A ;
Molina, CA .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS & MANAGEMENT STRATEGY, 2005, 14 (02) :263-297
[3]  
American Airlines, 2011, FREQ ASK QUEST SUPPL
[4]  
[Anonymous], WALL STREET J
[5]  
Antitrust Modernization Commission, 2007, REP REC
[6]   Competition and diversification effects in supply chains with supplier default risk [J].
Babich, Volodymyr ;
Burnetas, Apostolos N. ;
Ritchken, Peter H. .
M&SOM-MANUFACTURING & SERVICE OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2007, 9 (02) :123-146
[7]   Independence of Capacity Ordering and Financial Subsidies to Risky Suppliers [J].
Babich, Volodymyr .
M&SOM-MANUFACTURING & SERVICE OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2010, 12 (04) :583-607
[8]   A SIMPLE NONCOOPERATIVE BARGAINING MODEL OF CORPORATE REORGANIZATIONS [J].
BAIRD, DG ;
PICKER, RC .
JOURNAL OF LEGAL STUDIES, 1991, 20 (02) :311-349
[9]  
BEBCHUK LA, 1992, J LAW ECON ORGAN, V8, P253
[10]  
Birge JR, 2014, OPERATIONAL STRATEGI