Knowledge syntheses in medical education: A bibliometric analysis

被引:33
作者
Maggio, Lauren A. [1 ]
Costello, Joseph A. [1 ]
Norton, Candace [1 ]
Driessen, Erik W. [2 ]
Artino Jr, Anthony R. [3 ]
机构
[1] Uniformed Serv Univ Hlth Sci, Bethesda, MD 20814 USA
[2] Maastricht Univ, Fac Hlth Med & Life Sci, Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] George Washington Univ, Sch Med & Hlth Sci, Washington, DC 20052 USA
关键词
Review; Knowledge synthesis; Publishing; Scholarly communication; HEALTH-PROFESSIONS EDUCATION; STANDARDS; REVIEWS;
D O I
10.1007/s40037-020-00626-9
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Purpose This bibliometric analysis maps the landscape of knowledge syntheses in medical education. It provides scholars with a roadmap for understanding where the field has been and where it might go in the future, thereby informing research and educational practice. In particular, this analysis details the venues in which knowledge syntheses are published, the types of syntheses conducted, citation rates they produce, and altmetric attention they garner. Method In 2020, the authors conducted a bibliometric analysis of knowledge syntheses published in 14 core medical education journals from 1999 to 2019. To characterize the studies, metadata were extracted from PubMed, Web of Science, Altmetrics Explorer, and Unpaywall. Results The authors analyzed 963 knowledge syntheses representing 3.1% of the total articles published (n= 30,597). On average, 45.9 knowledge syntheses were published annually (SD= 35.85, median= 33), and there was an overall 2620% increase in the number of knowledge syntheses published from 1999 to 2019. The journals each published, on average, a total of 68.8 knowledge syntheses (SD= 67.2, median= 41) with Medical Education publishing the most (n= 189; 19%). Twenty-one types of knowledge synthesis were identified, the most prevalent being systematic reviews (n= 341; 35.4%) and scoping reviews (n= 88; 9.1%). Knowledge syntheses were cited an average of 53.80 times (SD= 107.12, median= 19) and received a mean Altmetric Attention Score of 14.12 (SD= 37.59, median= 6). Conclusions There has been considerable growth in knowledge syntheses in medical education over the past 20 years, contributing to medical education's evidence base. Beyond this increase in volume, researchers have introduced methodological diversity in these publications, and the community has taken to social media to share knowledge syntheses. Implications for the field, including the impact of synthesis types and their relationship to knowledge translation, are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:79 / 87
页数:9
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]   Comparing alternative and traditional dissemination metrics in medical education [J].
Amath, Aysah ;
Ambacher, Kristin ;
Leddy, John J. ;
Wood, Timothy J. ;
Ramnanan, Christopher J. .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2017, 51 (09) :935-941
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2020, GOOGL SHEETS
[3]   Impact factor of medical education journals and recently developed indices: Can any of them support academic promotion criteria? [J].
Azer, S. A. ;
Holen, A. ;
Wilson, I ;
Skokauskas, N. .
JOURNAL OF POSTGRADUATE MEDICINE, 2016, 62 (01) :32-39
[4]   The Top-Cited Articles in Medical Education: A Bibliometric Analysis [J].
Azer, Samy A. .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2015, 90 (08) :1147-1161
[5]   Core Competencies or a Competent Core? A Scoping Review and Realist Synthesis of Invasive Bedside Procedural Skills Training in Internal Medicine [J].
Brydges, Ryan ;
Stroud, Lynfa ;
Wong, Brian M. ;
Holmboe, Eric S. ;
Imrie, Kevin ;
Hatala, Rose .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2017, 92 (11) :1632-1643
[6]  
Canadian Institutes of Health Research. Knowledge translation, 2016, KNOWL TRANSL
[7]   Health Professions Education Graduate Programs Are a Pathway to Strengthening Continuing Professional Development [J].
Cervero, Ronald M. ;
Artino, Anthony R., Jr. ;
Daley, Barbara J. ;
Durning, Steven J. .
JOURNAL OF CONTINUING EDUCATION IN THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 2017, 37 (02) :147-151
[8]   A systematic review of the effectiveness of flipped classrooms in medical education [J].
Chen, Fei ;
Lui, Angela M. ;
Martinelli, Susan M. .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2017, 51 (06) :585-597
[9]   Twelve tips for medical students to conduct a systematic review [J].
Choi, Ariel R. ;
Cheng, Derrick L. ;
Greenberg, Paul B. .
MEDICAL TEACHER, 2019, 41 (04) :471-475
[10]   Effectiveness of problem-based learning curricula: Research and theory [J].
Colliver, JA .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2000, 75 (03) :259-266