A comparative exergoeconomic analysis of two biomass and co-firing combined power plants

被引:118
|
作者
Soltani, S. [1 ]
Mahmoudi, S. M. S. [1 ]
Yari, M. [2 ]
Morosuk, T. [3 ]
Rosen, M. A. [4 ]
Zare, V. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tabriz, Fac Mech Engn, Tabriz, Iran
[2] Univ Mohaghegh Ardabili, Fac Engn, Dept Mech Engn, Ardebil 179, Iran
[3] Tech Univ Berlin, Inst Energy Engn, D-10587 Berlin, Germany
[4] Univ Ontario, Inst Technol, Fac Engn & Appl Sci, Oshawa, ON L1H 7K4, Canada
关键词
Biomass; Gasifier; Combined cycle; Energy; Exergy; Exergoeconomic analysis; NATURAL-GAS; THERMOECONOMIC ANALYSIS; THERMODYNAMIC ANALYSES; SYSTEM; OPTIMIZATION; GASIFICATION; PERFORMANCE; HYDROGEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.enconman.2013.07.030
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Biomass energy is a promising potential replacement for fossil fuels in future, because it is relatively abundant, clean and carbon dioxide neutral. Biomass can be converted using thermo-chemical and bio-chemical processes into solid, liquid and gas bio-fuels, which can then be used for generating heat and/or electricity. In the present work, the application of gasification for electricity production is investigated via energy, exergy and exergoeconomic analyses for two configurations: (I) externally fired biomass combined cycle, and (2) combined cycle with co-firing of biomass and natural gas. The second configuration is found to be more economic (on a large scale) as its relative cost difference and exergoeconomic factor are less than those for the first configuration. The results also indicate that the energy and exergy efficiencies of combined cycle with co-firing could be about 2% and 4% higher than those of the externally fired combined cycle, respectively. The energy and exergy efficiencies of both configurations are maximized at particular values of compressor pressure ratio, but higher pressure ratios lead to higher values of the total unit product cost in both configurations. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:83 / 91
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A comparative exergoeconomic evaluation of biomass post-firing and co-firing combined power plants
    Athari, Hassan
    Soltani, Saeed
    Rosen, Marc A.
    Mahmoudi, Seyed Mohammad Seyed
    Morosuk, Tatiana
    BIOFUELS-UK, 2017, 8 (01): : 1 - 15
  • [2] Assessment of Biomass Co-Firing Potentials in Coal Power Plants
    Garcia-Galindo, Daniel
    Royo, Francisco Javier
    Sebastian, Fernando
    STROJARSTVO, 2010, 52 (04): : 411 - 427
  • [3] Study of briquetted biomass co-firing mode in power plants
    Liu, Yuanyi
    Wang, Xuebin
    Xiong, Yingying
    Tan, Houzhang
    Niu, Yanqing
    APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2014, 63 (01) : 266 - 271
  • [4] Drivers of biomass co-firing in US coal-fired power plants
    Goerndt, Michael E.
    Aguilar, Francisco X.
    Skog, Kenneth
    BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2013, 58 : 158 - 167
  • [5] Co-firing in coal power plants and its impact on biomass feedstock availability
    Dumortier, Jerome
    ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 60 : 396 - 405
  • [6] Co-firing Biomass
    Hunt, Trotter
    Tennant, David
    POWER ENGINEERING, 2009, 113 (11) : 226 - +
  • [7] Comparative life cycle assessment of biomass co-firing plants with carbon capture and storage
    Schakel, Wouter
    Meerman, Hans
    Talaei, Alireza
    Ramirez, Andrea
    Faaij, Andre
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2014, 131 : 441 - 467
  • [8] Study on Multi-objective Optimization for Biomass and Coal Co-firing in Power Plants
    Huang, Qian
    Lu, Li
    CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 6TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON PROJECT MANAGEMENT (ISPM2018), 2018, : 518 - 523
  • [9] Exergoeconomic analysis of a biomass post-firing combined-cycle power plant
    Athari, Hassan
    Soltani, Saeed
    Mahmoudi, Seyed Mohammad Seyed
    Rosen, Marc A.
    Morosuk, Tatiana
    ENERGY, 2014, 77 : 553 - 561
  • [10] Co-firing of biomass with coals
    Tas, Sinem
    Yurum, Yuda
    JOURNAL OF THERMAL ANALYSIS AND CALORIMETRY, 2012, 107 (01) : 293 - 298