Disclosure of research results: a randomized study on GENEPSO-PS cohort participants

被引:3
作者
Mancini, Julien [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Le Cozannet, Elodie [1 ,2 ]
Bouhnik, Anne-Deborah [1 ,2 ]
Resseguier, Noemie [1 ,2 ]
Lasset, Christine [4 ]
Mouret-Fourme, Emmanuelle [5 ]
Nogues, Catherine [5 ]
Julian-Reynier, Claire [1 ,2 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Aix Marseille Univ, UMR S912, IRD, SESSTIM, Marseille, France
[2] INSERM, UMR912, SESSTIM, Marseille, France
[3] Hop La Timone, APHM, BiosTIC, Marseille, France
[4] Ctr Leon Berard, Lyon, France
[5] Hop Rene Huguenin, Inst Curie, St Cloud, France
[6] Inst Paoli Calmettes, Res, Marseille, France
关键词
BRCA1/2; cohort; disclosure; results; randomized controlled trials; satisfaction; BRCA1/2; CARRIERS; COMMUNICATION; PERCEPTIONS; FAMILY; SCALE; TIME; CARE;
D O I
10.1111/hex.12390
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background There exist no recommendations as to how aggregate research results should best be disclosed to long-term cohort participants. Objective To study the impact of cohort results disclosure documents of various kinds on participants' satisfaction. Design Randomized study with a 2x2 factorial design. Setting and participants The GENEPSO-PS cohort is used to study the psychosocial characteristics and preventive behaviour of both BRCA1/2 carriers and non-carriers; 235 participants wishing to receive 'information about the survey results' answered a self-administered questionnaire. Interventions The impact of providing the following items in addition to a leaflet about aggregate psychosocial research results was investigated (i) an up-to-date medical information sheet about BRCA1/2 genetic topics, (ii) a photograph with the names of the researchers. Main outcome measures Satisfaction profiles drawn up using cluster analysis methods. Results Providing additional medical and/or research team information had no significant effect on satisfaction. The patients attributed to the 'poorly satisfied' group (n = 60, 25.5%) differed significantly from those in the 'highly satisfied' group (n = 51, 21.7%): they were younger [odds ratio (OR) = 0.96, 95% confidence interval (0.92-0.99), P = 0.028], less often had a daughter [OR = 4.87 (1.80-13.20), P = 0.002], had reached a higher educational level [OR = 2.94 (1.24-6.95), P = 0.014] and more frequently carried a BRCA1/2 mutation [OR = 2.73 (1.20-6.23), P = 0.017]. Conclusions This original approach to disclosing research results to cohort participants was welcomed by most of the participants, but less by the more educated and by BRCA1/2 carriers. Although an easily understandable document is necessary, it might also be worth providing some participants with more in-depth information.
引用
收藏
页码:1023 / 1035
页数:13
相关论文
共 31 条
[21]   Readability standards for informed-consent forms as compared with actual readability [J].
Paasche-Orlow, MK ;
Taylor, HA ;
Brancati, FL .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2003, 348 (08) :721-726
[22]  
RADLOFF L S, 1977, Applied Psychological Measurement, V1, P385, DOI 10.1177/014662167700100306
[23]   An exploration of the communication preferences regarding genetic testing in individuals from families with identified breast/ovarian cancer mutations [J].
Ratnayake, Paboda ;
Wakefield, Claire E. ;
Meiser, Bettina ;
Suthers, Graeme ;
Price, Melanie A. ;
Duffy, Jessica ;
Tucker, Kathy .
FAMILIAL CANCER, 2011, 10 (01) :97-105
[24]   "They should take time": Disclosure of clinical trial results as part of a social relationship [J].
Sarradon-Eck, Aline ;
Sakoyan, Juliette ;
Desclaux, Alice ;
Mancini, Julien ;
Genre, Dominique ;
Julian-Reynier, Claire .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2012, 75 (05) :873-882
[25]  
SCHULTE PA, 1991, J CLIN EPIDEMIOL, V44, pS57
[26]  
SCHULTE PA, 1996, ETHICS EPIDEMIOLOGY, P178
[27]   Communicating the results of clinical research to participants: Attitudes, practices, and future directions [J].
Shalowitz, David I. ;
Miller, Franklin G. .
PLOS MEDICINE, 2008, 5 (05) :714-720
[28]   A 12-item short-form health survey - Construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity [J].
Ware, JE ;
Kosinski, M ;
Keller, SD .
MEDICAL CARE, 1996, 34 (03) :220-233
[29]   Registration of observational studies: Is it time? [J].
Williams, Rebecca J. ;
Tse, Tony ;
Harlan, William R. ;
Zarin, Deborah A. .
CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2010, 182 (15) :1638-1642
[30]   Understanding preferences for disclosure of individual biomarker results among participants in a longitudinal birth cohort [J].
Wilson, Stephen E. ;
Baker, Erin R. ;
Leonard, Anthony C. ;
Eckman, Mark H. ;
Lanphear, Bruce P. .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2010, 36 (12) :736-740