Can Maxwell's Fish Eye Lens Really Give Perfect Imaging? Part III. A Careful Reconsideration of the "Evidence for Subwavelength Imaging with Positive Refraction"

被引:6
|
作者
He, Sailing [1 ,2 ]
Sun, Fei [1 ,2 ]
Guo, Shuwei [1 ]
Zhong, Shuomin [1 ]
Lan, Lu [1 ]
Jiang, Wei [1 ]
Ma, Yungui [1 ]
Wu, Tiantain [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, JORCEP, Zhejiang Prov Key Lab Sensing Technol, Ctr Opt & Electromagnet Res, Hangzhou 310058, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Royal Inst Technol KTH, Sch Elect Engn, Dept Electromagnet Engn, S-10044 Stockholm, Sweden
来源
PROGRESS IN ELECTROMAGNETICS RESEARCH-PIER | 2015年 / 152卷
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
MICROSCOPY;
D O I
10.2528/PIER15050101
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Many scientists do not believe that Maxwell's fish eye mirror (MFEM) can provide perfect imaging even if there is a drain array around the imaging points. However, one microwave experiment found a case where a 0.2 lambda resolution could be achieved in an MFEM experiment [1]. In this paper, we show that the MFEM cannot resolve two imaging points at such a subwavelength resolution in most cases even in the presence of a drain array, and an extraordinary case of subwavelength imaging requires a particular phase difference between two coherent sources. Both numerical simulations and experimental results show that the phase difference of two subwavelength-distanced coherent sources greatly influences the field distribution around the drain array. In very few cases (when the phase difference of the two sources is chosen to be a very specific value), we might resolve the image points in the drain array under the assumption that the power absorbed by the scanning cable on the left side of the drain array should be symmetric to that on the right side of the drain array [1]. However, in most cases, we cannot obtain a super-resolution imaging, as other drains around the image points will greatly influence the imaging. We also note that the experiment assumed that the power absorbed by the scanning cable on the left and the right sides of the drain array is symmetric is not correct for the experiment reported in [1], as the drain array itself is not symmetric. The highly non-symmetric distribution of the absorbed power is also verified by our simulation and experimental results. The experimental "result" of resolving two image peaks could potentially be recovered using only a single image peak, which demonstrates the wrong assumption of mirror symmetry. Comparisons and comments on perfect passive drains, "super-resolution" in a spherical geodesic waveguide, and time reverse imaging are also given.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 15
页数:15
相关论文
共 4 条
  • [1] Can Maxwell’s fish eye lens really give perfect imaging? Part III. A careful reconsideration of the evidence for subwavelength imaging with positive refraction
    He, Sailing
    Sun, Fei
    Guo, Shuwei
    Zhong, Shuomin
    Lan, Lu
    Jiang, Wei
    Ma, Yungui
    Wu, Tiantain
    Progress in Electromagnetics Research, 2015, 152 : 1 - 15
  • [2] CAN MAXWELL'S FISH EYE LENS REALLY GIVE PERFECT IMAGING?
    Sun, F.
    He, S.
    PROGRESS IN ELECTROMAGNETICS RESEARCH-PIER, 2010, 108 : 307 - 322
  • [3] CAN MAXWELL'S FISH EYE LENS REALLY GIVE PERFECT IMAGING? PART II. THE CASE WITH PASSIVE DRAINS
    Sun, F.
    Ge, X. C.
    He, S.
    PROGRESS IN ELECTROMAGNETICS RESEARCH-PIER, 2010, 110 : 313 - 328
  • [4] Maxwell's fish-eye lens and the mirage of perfect imaging
    Merlin, R.
    JOURNAL OF OPTICS, 2011, 13 (02)