Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Danish version of the Oxford hip score ASSESSED AGAINST GENERIC AND DISEASE-SPECIFIC QUESTIONNAIRES

被引:58
作者
Paulsen, A. [1 ]
Odgaard, A. [1 ]
Overgaard, S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Odense Univ Hosp, DK-5000 Odense, Denmark
来源
BONE & JOINT RESEARCH | 2012年 / 1卷 / 09期
关键词
Patient-reported outcome measurement instrument; PRO; PROMs; Oxford hip score; OHS; Validation; Total hip replacement; THR; Danish Hip Arthroplasty Registry (DHR); FORM HEALTH SURVEY; OUTCOME MEASURES; ARTHROPLASTY; VALIDITY; OSTEOARTHRITIS; REPLACEMENT; RESPONSIVENESS; RELIABILITY; DISABILITY; DUTCH;
D O I
10.1302/2046-3758.19.2000076
中图分类号
Q813 [细胞工程];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives The Oxford hip score (OHS) is a 12-item questionnaire designed and developed to assess function and pain from the perspective of patients who are undergoing total hip replacement (THR). The OHS has been shown to be consistent, reliable, valid and sensitive to clinical change following THR. It has been translated into different languages, but no adequately translated, adapted and validated Danish language version exists. Methods The OHS was translated and cross-culturally adapted into Danish from the original English version, using methods based on best-practice guidelines. The translation was tested for psychometric quality in patients drawn from a cohort from the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register (DHR). Results The Danish OHS had a response rate of 87.4%, no floor effect and a 19.9% ceiling effect (as expected in post-operative patients). Only 1.2% of patients had too many items missing to calculate a sum score. Construct validity was adequate and 80% of our predefined hypotheses regarding the correlation between scores on the Danish OHS and the other questionnaires were confirmed. The intraclass correlation (ICC) of the different items ranged from 0.80 to 0.95 and the average limits of agreement (LOA) ranged from -0.05 to 0.06. The Danish OHS had a high internal consistency with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.99 and an average inter-item correlation of 0.88. Conclusions This Danish version of the OHS is a valid and reliable patient-reported outcome measurement instrument (PROM) with similar qualities to the original English language version.
引用
收藏
页码:225 / 233
页数:9
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2009, DANISH HIP ARTHROPLA
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2010, NORWEGIAN ARTHROPLAS
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2009, 6 NAT JOINT REG ENGL
  • [4] What is a good patient reported outcome after total hip replacement?
    Arden, N. K.
    Kiran, A.
    Judge, A.
    Biant, L. C.
    Javaid, M. K.
    Murray, D. W.
    Carr, A. J.
    Cooper, C.
    Field, R. E.
    [J]. OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2011, 19 (02) : 155 - 162
  • [5] EuroQol: The current state of play
    Brooks, R
    [J]. HEALTH POLICY, 1996, 37 (01) : 53 - 72
  • [6] CONSTRUCT VALIDITY IN PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS
    CRONBACH, LJ
    MEEHL, PE
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1955, 52 (04) : 281 - 302
  • [7] Comparative, validity and responsiveness of the HOOS-PS and KOOS-PS to the WOMAC physical function subscale in total joint replacement for Osteoarthritis
    Davis, A. M.
    Perruccio, A. V.
    Canizares, M.
    Hawker, G. A.
    Roos, E. M.
    Maillefert, J. -F.
    Lohmander, L. S.
    [J]. OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2009, 17 (07) : 843 - 847
  • [8] Evidence for the validity of a patient-based instrument for assessment of outcome after revision hip replacement
    Dawson, J
    Fitzpatrick, R
    Frost, S
    Gundle, R
    McLardy-Smith, P
    Murray, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2001, 83B (08): : 1125 - 1129
  • [9] Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replacement
    Dawson, J
    Fitzpatrick, R
    Carr, A
    Murray, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1996, 78B (02): : 185 - 190
  • [10] Dawson J, 2010, USER MANUAL OXFORD H, V2010