An Energy Model Using Sleeping Algorithms for Wireless Sensor Networks under Proactive and Reactive Protocols: A Performance Evaluation

被引:15
作者
Del-Valle-Soto, Carolina [1 ]
Velazquez, Ramiro [2 ]
Valdivia, Leonardo J. [1 ]
Giannoccaro, Nicola Ivan [3 ]
Visconti, Paolo [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Panamer, Fac Ingn, Alvaro Portillo 49, Zapopan 45010, Jalisco, Mexico
[2] Univ Panamer, Fac Ingn, Josemaria Escriva Balaguer 101, Aguascalientes 20290, Aguascalientes, Mexico
[3] Univ Salento, Dept Innovat Engn, I-73100 Lecce, Italy
关键词
wireless sensor networks; energy consumption; sleeping algorithms; performance metrics; Routing Protocol; Internet of Things; SPI COMMUNICATION PROTOCOL; ROUTING PROTOCOL; OPERATION PRINCIPLE; CONSUMPTION; LIFETIME; DESIGN; LIMITS; MAC;
D O I
10.3390/en13113024
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The continuous evolution of the Internet of Things (IoT) makes it possible to connect everyday objects to networks in order to monitor physical and environmental conditions, which is made possible due to wireless sensor networks (WSN) that enable the transfer of data. However, it has also brought about many challenges that need to be addressed, such as excess energy consumption. Accordingly, this paper presents and analyzes wireless network energy models using five different communication protocols: Ad Hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV), Multi-Parent Hierarchical (MPH), Dynamic Source Routing (DSR), Low Energy Adaptive Clustering Hierarchy (LEACH) and Zigbee Tree Routing (ZTR). First, a series of metrics are defined to establish a comparison and determine which protocol exhibits the best energy consumption performance. Then, simulations are performed and the results are compared with real scenarios. The energy analysis is conducted with three proposed sleeping algorithms: Modified Sleeping Crown (MSC), Timer Sleeping Algorithm (TSA), and Local Energy Information (LEI). Thereafter, the proposed algorithms are compared by virtue of two widely used wireless technologies, namely Zigbee and WiFi. Indeed, the results suggest that Zigbee has a better energy performance than WiFi, but less redundancy in the topology links, and this study favors the analysis with the simulation of protocols with different nature. The tested scenario is implemented into a university campus to show a real network running.
引用
收藏
页数:31
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Energy-Efficient Routing Protocols in Wireless Sensor Networks: A Survey
    Pantazis, Nikolaos A.
    Nikolidakis, Stefanos A.
    Vergados, Dimitrios D.
    [J]. IEEE COMMUNICATIONS SURVEYS AND TUTORIALS, 2013, 15 (02): : 551 - 591
  • [32] On the Energy Efficiency of LT Codes in Proactive Wireless Sensor Networks
    Abouei, Jamshid
    Brown, J. David
    Plataniotis, Konstantinos N.
    Pasupathy, Subbarayan
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2011, 59 (03) : 1116 - 1127
  • [33] Evaluating the Performance of Routing Protocols in Wireless Sensor Networks
    Goswami, Poulomi
    Jadhav, A. D.
    [J]. 2012 THIRD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTING COMMUNICATION & NETWORKING TECHNOLOGIES (ICCCNT), 2012,
  • [34] Analysis of Clustering Routing Protocols and Evaluation Methods in Wireless Sensor Networks
    Wu, Mei
    Cao, Ning
    Li, Guofu
    Min, Qiusha
    Zhang, Yuanyuan
    Li, Chao
    [J]. 2017 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING (CSE) AND IEEE/IFIP INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EMBEDDED AND UBIQUITOUS COMPUTING (EUC), VOL 2, 2017, : 372 - 375
  • [35] Energy Efficient Cross-Layer Transmission Model for Mobile Wireless Sensor Networks
    Yang, Xin
    Wang, Ling
    Xie, Jian
    [J]. MOBILE INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2017, 2017
  • [36] Performance of Wireless Sensor Network Under Various Energy Models, Routing Protocols and Node Mobility Conditions
    Asheer, Sarah
    Kumar, Sanjeet
    [J]. 2014 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED COMMUNICATION CONTROL AND COMPUTING TECHNOLOGIES (ICACCCT), 2014, : 813 - 817
  • [37] Survey on Recent Advancements in Energy-Efficient Routing Protocols for Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks
    Khisa, Shreya
    Moh, Sangman
    [J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2021, 9 : 55045 - 55062
  • [38] Analytical Model for Performance Evaluation of Random Wireless Sensor Networks
    Giertzsch, Fabian
    Krueger, Leo
    Timm-Giel, Andreas
    [J]. MSWIM'18: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 21ST ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MODELING, ANALYSIS AND SIMULATION OF WIRELESS AND MOBILE SYSTEMS, 2018, : 235 - 239
  • [39] Performance evaluation of range-free localization algorithms for wireless sensor networks
    Ibrahim Nemer
    Tarek Sheltami
    Elhadi Shakshuki
    Abdulrahman Abu Elkhail
    Mumin Adam
    [J]. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 2021, 25 : 177 - 203
  • [40] Performance evaluation of range-free localization algorithms for wireless sensor networks
    Nemer, Ibrahim
    Sheltami, Tarek
    Shakshuki, Elhadi
    Abu Elkhail, Abdulrahman
    Adam, Mumin
    [J]. PERSONAL AND UBIQUITOUS COMPUTING, 2021, 25 (01) : 177 - 203