Probiotics for Celiac Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

被引:35
|
作者
Seiler, Caroline L. [1 ]
Kiflen, Michel [2 ]
Pablo Stefanolo, Juan [3 ]
Bai, Julio Cesar [3 ]
Bercik, Premysl [1 ]
Kelly, Ciaran P. [4 ,5 ]
Verdu, Elena F. [1 ]
Moayyedi, Paul [1 ]
Ines Pinto-Sanchez, Maria [1 ]
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Farncombe Digest Hlth Res Inst, Dept Med, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[2] Populat Hlth Res Inst, Genet & Mol Epidemiol Lab, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[3] Hosp Gastroenterol Dr CB Udaondo, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[4] Harvard Med Sch, Celiac Ctr, Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[5] Harvard Med Sch, Celiac Res Program, Boston, MA 02115 USA
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY | 2020年 / 115卷 / 10期
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
BIFIDOBACTERIUM-BREVE; SUPER STRAIN; DOUBLE-BLIND; CHILDREN; QUALITY; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.14309/ajg.0000000000000749
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
INTRODUCTION: Many patients with celiac disease (CD) experience persistent symptoms despite adhering to the gluten-free diet. Different studies have assessed the use of probiotics as an adjuvant treatment for CD. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of probiotics in improving gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms and quality of life (QOL) in patients with CD. METHODS: We searched EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Web of Science, CENTRAL, and DARE databases up to February 2019 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating probiotics compared with placebo for treating CD. We collected data on GI symptoms, QOL, adverse events, serum tumor necrosis factor-alpha, intestinal permeability, and microbiota composition. RESULTS: We screened 2,831 records and found that 7 articles describing 6 RCTs (n = 5,279 participants) were eligible for quantitative analysis. Probiotics improved GI symptoms when assessed by the GI Symptoms Rating Scale (mean difference symptom reduction: 228.7%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 243.96-213.52;P= 0.0002). There was no difference in GI symptoms after probiotics when different questionnaires were pooled. The levels ofBifidobacteriaincreased after probiotics (mean difference: 0.85 log colony-forming units (CFU) per gram; 95% CI 0.38-1.32 log CFU per gram;P= 0.0003). There were insufficient data on tumor necrosis factor-a levels or QOL for probiotics compared with placebo. No difference in adverse events was observed between probiotics and placebo. The overall certainty of the evidence ranged from very low to low. DISCUSSION: Probiotics may improve GI symptoms in patients with CD. High-quality clinical trials are needed to improve the certainty in the evidence (see Visual abstract, Supplementary Digital Content 2, http:// links.lww.com/AJG/B595).
引用
收藏
页码:1584 / 1595
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Probiotics for the Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Huang, Ruixue
    Ning, Huacheng
    Shen, Minxue
    Li, Jie
    Zhang, Jianglin
    Chen, Xiang
    FRONTIERS IN CELLULAR AND INFECTION MICROBIOLOGY, 2017, 7
  • [22] Probiotics for the Treatment of Asthma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials
    Ahanchian, Hamid
    Khorasani, Fatemeh
    Kiani, Mahammad Ali
    Khalesi, Maryam
    Ansari, Elham
    Jafari, Seyed Ali
    Kianifar, Hamid Reza
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS-MASHHAD, 2020, 8 (05): : 11271 - 11285
  • [23] Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials on probiotics for hepatic encephalopathy
    Holte, Kathrine
    Krag, Aleksander
    Gluud, Lise Lotte
    HEPATOLOGY RESEARCH, 2012, 42 (10) : 1008 - 1015
  • [24] Colchicine in cardiac disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Subodh Verma
    John W. Eikelboom
    Stefan M. Nidorf
    Mohammed Al-Omran
    Nandini Gupta
    Hwee Teoh
    Jan O. Friedrich
    BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, 15
  • [25] Colchicine in cardiac disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Verma, Subodh
    Eikelboom, John W.
    Nidorf, Stefan M.
    Al-Omran, Mohammed
    Gupta, Nandini
    Teoh, Hwee
    Friedrich, Jan O.
    BMC CARDIOVASCULAR DISORDERS, 2015, 15
  • [26] Efficacy of probiotics/synbiotics supplementation in patients with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Liu, Chang
    Yang, Letian
    Wei, Wei
    Fu, Ping
    FRONTIERS IN NUTRITION, 2024, 11
  • [27] Systematic Review/Meta-analysis Colchicine for Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Samuel, Michelle
    Tardif, Jean-Claude
    Bouabdallaoui, Nadia
    Khairy, Paul
    Dube, Marie-Pierre
    Blondeau, Lucie
    Guertin, Marie-Claude
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2021, 37 (05) : 776 - 785
  • [28] Use of probiotics in the treatment of severe acute pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Gou, Shanmiao
    Yang, Zhiyong
    Liu, Tao
    Wu, Heshui
    Wang, Chunyou
    CRITICAL CARE, 2014, 18 (02):
  • [29] The efficacy and safety of probiotics in the adjuvant treatment of psoriasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Zhu, Yiran
    Xu, Fan
    Chen, Hao
    Zheng, Quanhui
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2024, 11
  • [30] Positive Effect of Probiotics on Constipation in Children:A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Six Randomized Controlled Trials
    Huang, Ruixue
    Hu, Jianan
    FRONTIERS IN CELLULAR AND INFECTION MICROBIOLOGY, 2017, 7