Robotic retromuscular ventral hernia repair and transversus abdominis release: short-term outcomes and risk factors associated with perioperative complications

被引:26
|
作者
Gokcal, F. [1 ]
Morrison, S. [1 ]
Kudsi, O. Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] Tufts Univ, Sch Med, Good Samaritan Med Ctr, One Pear St, Brockton, MA 02301 USA
关键词
Robot-assisted laparoscopy; Ventral hernia repair; Transversus abdominis release; Incisional hernia; Retromuscular; Retrorectus; Rives-Stoppa; Sublay; POSTERIOR COMPONENT SEPARATION; LAPAROSCOPIC REPAIR; MUSCLE RELEASE; CLASSIFICATION; RECURRENCE; GROIN;
D O I
10.1007/s10029-019-01911-1
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Retromuscular ventral hernia repairs have become increasingly popular, both with and without transversus abdominis release. We aim to describe our 90-day outcomes in patients who underwent robotic retromuscular ventral hernia repair (RRVHR). Methods All patients were subcategorized into those who underwent a TAR (TAR+) as part of their repair, and those who did not (TAR-). Patient demographics, comorbidities, hernia characteristics, and LOS were studied. Perioperative complications were reviewed in four different time frames up to 90 days. All hernias and complications were classified using the recommended classification systems. Appropriate univariate analyses and multivariate regression analyses were performed to determine the hernia characteristics which required a TAR technique, and risk factors which associated with the development of complications. Results Of 454 robotic ventral hernia repairs, 101 patients who underwent RRVHR were included into the study. Of these, 54 patients underwent RRVHR with TAR while the remaining 47 patients underwent repair without TAR. Incisional hernias, off-midline locations, and larger size defects were factors that required the addition of a TAR. In 9.9% patients, an unplanned TAR was performed. Postoperative pain assessment was similar in both groups. LOS was significantly longer for TAR+group (p < 0.001). The median Comprehension Complication Index (R) score was 8.7 (range: 0-42.4) for all patients and was significantly higher for TAR+group (p = 0.014). Complications were higher in the TAR+group as compared to the TAR- group (p = 0.028), though this difference did not persist in follow-up. Most complications were minor (Clavien-Dindo grade-I and -II). The development of complications was only associated with the presence of an incarcerated hernia at repair. Conclusion RRVHR is safe and feasible. 9.9% of our cohort required a TAR that was unplanned, particularly incisional hernias. TAR patients may be more prone to complications in the immediate post-operative period, however, the difference between patients with and without TAR adjuncts resolved at 90 days.
引用
收藏
页码:375 / 385
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Robotic hernia repair. Part III: Robotic incisional hernia repair with transversus abdominis release (r-TAR). Video report and results of a cohort study
    Dietz, Ulrich A.
    Kudsi, O. Yusef
    Garcia-Urena, Miguel
    Baur, Johannes
    Ramser, Michaela
    Maksimovic, Sladjana
    Keller, Nicola
    Doerfer, Joerg
    Eisner, Lukas
    Wiegering, Armin
    CHIRURG, 2021, 92 (10): : 936 - 947
  • [32] Impact of COVID-19 on clinical outcomes of robotic retromuscular ventral hernia repair
    Omar Yusef Kudsi
    Georges Kaoukabani
    Naseem Bou-Ayash
    Allison S. Crawford
    Fahri Gokcal
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2023, 37 : 999 - 1004
  • [33] Robotic ventral hernia repair in morbidly obese patients: perioperative and mid-term outcomes
    Fahri Gokcal
    Sara Morrison
    Omar Yusef Kudsi
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2020, 34 : 3540 - 3549
  • [34] Short-term outcomes of eTEP repair of ventral hernia in university hospital of Nepal
    Mandal, Bikash
    Kumar, Abhijeet
    Agrawal, Sunit
    Sah, Suresh
    Gupta, Rakesh Kumar
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ABDOMINAL WALL AND HERNIA SURGERY, 2023, 6 (03) : 159 - 165
  • [35] Short-term comparison between preperitoneal and intraperitoneal onlay mesh placement in robotic ventral hernia repair
    Gokcal, F.
    Morrison, S.
    Kudsi, O. Y.
    HERNIA, 2019, 23 (05) : 957 - 967
  • [36] Risk Factors for Surgical Complications in Ventral Hernia Repair
    Lindmark, Mikael
    Strigard, Karin
    Lowenmark, Thyra
    Dahlstrand, Ursula
    Gunnarsson, Ulf
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 42 (11) : 3528 - 3536
  • [37] Quality of life and surgical outcomes of robotic retromuscular ventral hernia repair using a new hybrid mesh reinforcement
    Kudsi, Omar Yusef
    Kaoukabani, Georges
    Bou-Ayash, Naseem
    Vallar, Kelly
    Chudner, Alexandra
    LaGrange, Sara
    Gokcal, Fahri
    HERNIA, 2022, 26 (03) : 881 - 888
  • [38] Outcomes of transversus abdominis release in non-elective incisional hernia repair: a retrospective review of the Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative (AHSQC)
    Alkhatib, H.
    Tastaldi, L.
    Krpata, D. M.
    Petro, C. C.
    Olson, M.
    Rosenblatt, S.
    Rosen, M. J.
    Prabhu, A. S.
    HERNIA, 2019, 23 (01) : 43 - 49
  • [39] Short-term outcomes of minimally invasive techniques in posterior component separation for ventral hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Tryliskyy, Y.
    Kebkalo, A.
    Tyselskyi, V.
    Owais, A.
    Pournaras, D. J.
    HERNIA, 2024, 28 (05) : 1497 - 1509
  • [40] Robotic retromuscular abdominal wall repair using an inverted TEP (iTEP) approach: surgical technique and short-term outcomes
    Olivier, Frederick
    Abasbassi, Mohamed
    Geers, Joachim
    LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2022, 407 (05) : 2177 - 2186