Single-level cervical radiculopathy: clinical outcome and cost-effectiveness of four techniques of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion and disc arthroplasty

被引:61
|
作者
Bhadra, Arup K. [1 ]
Raman, A. S. [1 ]
Casey, Adrian T. H. [1 ]
Crawford, R. J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Royal Natl Orthopaed Hosp, Stanmore HA7 4LP, Middx, England
[2] Norfolk & Norwich Univ Hosp, Norwich, Norfolk, England
关键词
Cervical radiculopathy; ACDF; Disc arthroplasty; Clinical outcome; Cost-effectiveness; UP SURGICAL FUSION; INTERBODY FUSION; HETEROTOPIC OSSIFICATION; LOCKING PLATE; BONE-MATRIX; ALLOGRAFT; OPERATIONS; MORBIDITY; AUTOGRAFT; REMOVAL;
D O I
10.1007/s00586-008-0866-8
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Although there are several accepted methods of surgical treatment for single-level cervical radiculopathy, the choice depend on the surgeon's preference. The techniques may vary in peri-operative morbidity, short- and long-term outcome, but no study so far has analyzed their cost-effectiveness. This study might give some insight in balancing cost and effectiveness and deciding the right technique. Sixty consecutive patients (15 each group), mean age 36 (range 24-76 years) with single-level cervical disc disease underwent surgical treatment with four different techniques in two centers over the period of 1999-2005. The four groups were-(1) plate and tricortical autograft, (2) plate, cage, and bone substitute, (3) cage only, and (4) disc arthroplasty. The data was collected prospectively according to our protocol and subsequently analyzed. The clinical outcome was assessed comparing visual analog scale (VAS) of neck pain and, short form 12 (SF12) questionnaire both pre- and postoperatively. The radiological assessment was done for fusion rate and postoperative related possible complications at 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and final follow-up. The cost analysis was done calculating the operative time, hospital stay, implant cost together. The mean follow-up period was 31 months (range 28-43 months). The clinical outcome in terms of VAS of neck and arm pain and SF12 physical and mental score improvement (P = 0.001) were comparable with all four techniques. The radiological fusion rate was comparable to current available data. As the hospital stay was longer (average 5 days) with plate and autograft group, the total cost was maximum (average A 2,920) pound with this group. There was satisfactory clinical and radiological outcome with all four techniques. Using the cage alone was the most cost-effective technique, but the disc arthroplasty was comparable to the use of cage and plate. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion is an established surgical treatment for cervical radiculopathy. Single-level cervical radiculopathy was treated with four different techniques. The clinical outcome and cost-effectiveness were compared in this study.
引用
收藏
页码:232 / 237
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of dynamic cervical implant versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the treatment of single-level cervical degenerative disc disease: A five-year follow-up
    Zhu, Ce
    Yang, Xi
    Wang, Lei
    Hu, Bo-wen
    Liu, Li-min
    Wang, Lin-nan
    Liu, Hao
    Song, Yue-ming
    CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 164 : 103 - 107
  • [32] What is a better value for your time? Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus cervical disc arthroplasty
    Katz, Austen David
    Song, Junho
    Bowles, Daniel
    Ng, Terence
    Neufeld, Eric
    Hasan, Sayyida
    Perfetti, Dean
    Sodhi, Nipun
    Essig, David
    Silber, Jeff
    Virk, Sohrab
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOVERTEBRAL JUNCTION AND SPINE, 2022, 13 (03) : 331 - 338
  • [33] Single-level anterior cervical discectomy and interbody fusion using PEEK anatomical cervical cage and allograft bone
    Faldini C.
    Chehrassan M.
    Miscione M.T.
    Acri F.
    D'Amato M.
    Pungetti C.
    Luciani D.
    Giannini S.
    Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, 2011, 12 (4) : 201 - 205
  • [34] Revision Rates After Single-Level Cervical Disc Arthroplasty Versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: An Observational Study With 5-Year Minimum Follow-Up
    Gordon, Adam M.
    Elali, Faisal R.
    Saleh, Ahmed
    SPINE, 2025, 50 (01) : 19 - 25
  • [35] Adjacent Level Degeneration Bryan Total Disc Arthroplasty Versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
    Miller, Justin
    Sasso, Rick
    Anderson, Paul
    Riew, K. Daniel
    McPhilamy, Austin
    Gianaris, Thomas
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2018, 31 (02): : E98 - E101
  • [36] Clinical Outcomes After Four-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
    Kreitz, Tyler M.
    Hollern, Douglas A.
    Padegimas, Eric M.
    Schroeder, Gregory D.
    Kepler, Christopher K.
    Vaccaro, Alexander R.
    Hilibrand, Alan S.
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2018, 8 (08) : 776 - 783
  • [37] Risk Factors for Postoperative Subsidence of Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion The Significance of the Preoperative Cervical Alignment
    Lee, Young-Seok
    Kim, Young-Baeg
    Park, Seung-Won
    SPINE, 2014, 39 (16) : 1280 - 1287
  • [38] Prospective, multicenter clinical trial comparing M6-C compressible six degrees of freedom cervical disc with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the treatment of single-level degenerative cervical radiculopathy: 2-year results of an FDA investigational device exemption study
    Phillips, Frank M.
    Coric, Domagoj
    Sasso, Rick
    Lanman, Todd
    Lavelle, William
    Blumenthal, Scott
    Lauryssen, Carl
    Guyer, Richard
    Albert, Todd
    Zigler, Jack
    Cammisa, Frank
    Milam, Robert Alden
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2021, 21 (02) : 239 - 252
  • [39] Microscopic Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Versus Posterior Percutaneous Endoscopic Cervical Keyhole Foraminotomy for Single-level Unilateral Cervical Radiculopathy A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Guo, Linlin
    Wang, Jiajing
    Zhao, Zhen
    Li, Jing
    Zhao, Hongyang
    Gao, Yong
    Chen, Chao
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2023, 36 (02): : 59 - 69
  • [40] Is the bone fusion affected by Modic-2 changes in single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion?
    Huang, Kangkang
    Hong, Ying
    Liu, Hao
    Duan, Yuchen
    Wang, Beiyu
    Chen, Hua
    Ding, Chen
    Rong, Xin
    Wu, Tingkui
    MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (01)