Single-level cervical radiculopathy: clinical outcome and cost-effectiveness of four techniques of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion and disc arthroplasty

被引:61
|
作者
Bhadra, Arup K. [1 ]
Raman, A. S. [1 ]
Casey, Adrian T. H. [1 ]
Crawford, R. J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Royal Natl Orthopaed Hosp, Stanmore HA7 4LP, Middx, England
[2] Norfolk & Norwich Univ Hosp, Norwich, Norfolk, England
关键词
Cervical radiculopathy; ACDF; Disc arthroplasty; Clinical outcome; Cost-effectiveness; UP SURGICAL FUSION; INTERBODY FUSION; HETEROTOPIC OSSIFICATION; LOCKING PLATE; BONE-MATRIX; ALLOGRAFT; OPERATIONS; MORBIDITY; AUTOGRAFT; REMOVAL;
D O I
10.1007/s00586-008-0866-8
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Although there are several accepted methods of surgical treatment for single-level cervical radiculopathy, the choice depend on the surgeon's preference. The techniques may vary in peri-operative morbidity, short- and long-term outcome, but no study so far has analyzed their cost-effectiveness. This study might give some insight in balancing cost and effectiveness and deciding the right technique. Sixty consecutive patients (15 each group), mean age 36 (range 24-76 years) with single-level cervical disc disease underwent surgical treatment with four different techniques in two centers over the period of 1999-2005. The four groups were-(1) plate and tricortical autograft, (2) plate, cage, and bone substitute, (3) cage only, and (4) disc arthroplasty. The data was collected prospectively according to our protocol and subsequently analyzed. The clinical outcome was assessed comparing visual analog scale (VAS) of neck pain and, short form 12 (SF12) questionnaire both pre- and postoperatively. The radiological assessment was done for fusion rate and postoperative related possible complications at 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and final follow-up. The cost analysis was done calculating the operative time, hospital stay, implant cost together. The mean follow-up period was 31 months (range 28-43 months). The clinical outcome in terms of VAS of neck and arm pain and SF12 physical and mental score improvement (P = 0.001) were comparable with all four techniques. The radiological fusion rate was comparable to current available data. As the hospital stay was longer (average 5 days) with plate and autograft group, the total cost was maximum (average A 2,920) pound with this group. There was satisfactory clinical and radiological outcome with all four techniques. Using the cage alone was the most cost-effective technique, but the disc arthroplasty was comparable to the use of cage and plate. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion is an established surgical treatment for cervical radiculopathy. Single-level cervical radiculopathy was treated with four different techniques. The clinical outcome and cost-effectiveness were compared in this study.
引用
收藏
页码:232 / 237
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Cost Effectiveness of Polyetheretheketone (PEEK) Cages for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
    Virk, Sohrab S.
    Elder, J. Bradley
    Sandhu, Harvinder S.
    Khan, Safdar N.
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2015, 28 (08): : E482 - E492
  • [22] The Impact of Menopause on Bone Fusion after the Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
    Park, Sung Bae
    Chung, Chun Kee
    Lee, Sang Hyung
    Yang, Hee-Jin
    Son, Young-Je
    Chung, Young Seob
    JOURNAL OF KOREAN NEUROSURGICAL SOCIETY, 2013, 54 (06) : 496 - 500
  • [23] Discover cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in symptomatic cervical disc diseases: A meta analysis
    Lei Shangguan
    Ning, Guang-Zhi
    Tang, Yu
    Wang, Zhe
    Luo, Zhuo-Jing
    Zhou, Yue
    PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (03):
  • [24] Predictive Factors of Postoperative Dysphagia in Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
    Vaishnav, Avani S.
    Saville, Philip
    McAnany, Steven
    Patel, Dil
    Haws, Brittany
    Khechen, Benjamin
    Singh, Kern
    Gang, Catherine Himo
    Qureshi, Sheeraz A.
    SPINE, 2019, 44 (07) : E400 - E407
  • [25] Research protocol: Cervical Arthroplasty Cost Effectiveness Study (CACES): economic evaluation of anterior cervical discectomy with arthroplasty (ACDA) versus anterior cervical discectomy with fusion (ACDF) in the surgical treatment of cervical degenerative disc disease — a randomized controlled trial
    Valérie N. E. Schuermans
    Anouk Y. J. M. Smeets
    Toon F. M. Boselie
    Math J. J. M. Candel
    Inez Curfs
    Silvia M. A. A. Evers
    Henk Van Santbrink
    Trials, 23
  • [26] Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Versus Cervical Disc Arthroplasty: A Comparison of National Trends and Outcomes
    Ostrov, Philip B.
    Reddy, Abhinav K.
    Ryoo, James S.
    Behbahani, Mandana
    Mehta, Ankit, I
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 160 : E96 - E110
  • [27] Arthroplasty Versus Fusion in Single-Level Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease A Cochrane Review
    Boselie, Toon F. M.
    Willems, Paul C.
    van Mameren, Henk
    de Bie, Rob A.
    Benzel, Edward C.
    van Santbrink, Henk
    SPINE, 2013, 38 (17) : E1096 - E1107
  • [28] Long Term Societal Costs of Anterior Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) versus Cervical Disc Arthroplasty (CDA) for Treatment of Cervical Radiculopathy
    Ghori, Ahmer
    Konopka, Joseph F.
    Makanji, Heeren
    Cha, Thomas D.
    Bono, Christopher M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY, 2016, 10
  • [29] Cost-Utility Analysis of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion With Plating (ACDFP) Versus Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy (PCF) for Patients With Single-level Cervical Radiculopathy at 1-Year Follow-up
    Alvin, Matthew D.
    Lubelski, Daniel
    Abdullah, Kalil G.
    Whitmore, Robert G.
    Benzel, Edward C.
    Mroz, Thomas E.
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2016, 29 (02): : E67 - E72
  • [30] Health Care Costs Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion or Cervical Disc Arthroplasty
    Nin, Darren Z.
    Chen, Ya-Wen
    Kim, David H.
    Niu, Ruijia
    Powers, Andrew
    Chang, David C.
    Hwang, Raymond W.
    SPINE, 2024, 49 (08) : 530 - 535