Comparative Genomics of Smut Pathogens: Insights From Orphans and Positively Selected Genes Into Host Specialization

被引:28
作者
Benevenuto, Juliana [1 ]
Teixeira-Silva, Natalia S. [1 ]
Kuramae, Eiko E. [2 ]
Croll, Daniel [3 ]
Monteiro-Vitorello, Claudia B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Luiz de Queiroz Coll Agr USP ESALQ, Dept Genet, Microbial Genet Lab, Piracicaba, Brazil
[2] Netherlands Inst Ecol NIOO KNAW, Dept Microbial Ecol, Wageningen, Netherlands
[3] Univ Neuchatel UNINE, Inst Biol, Lab Evolutionary Genet, Neuchatel, Switzerland
来源
FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY | 2018年 / 9卷
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会; 瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
Ustilaginaceae; host jump; effectors; orphan genes; positive selection; USTILAGO-MAYDIS; SPORISORIUM-REILIANUM; PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS; PLANT; FUNGI; EVOLUTION; PROTEIN; MAIZE; VIRULENCE; SPECIFICITY;
D O I
10.3389/fmicb.2018.00660
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Host specialization is a key evolutionary process for the diversification and emergence of new pathogens. However, the molecular determinants of host range are poorly understood. Smut fungi are biotrophic pathogens that have distinct and narrow host ranges based on largely unknown genetic determinants. Hence, we aimed to expand comparative genomics analyses of smut fungi by including more species infecting different hosts and to define orphans and positively selected genes to gain further insights into the genetics basis of host specialization. We analyzed nine lineages of smut fungi isolated from eight crop and non-crop hosts: maize, barley, sugarcane, wheat, oats, Zizania latifolia (Manchurian rice), Echinochloa colona (a wild grass), and Persicaria sp. (a wild dicot plant). We assembled two new genomes: Ustilago hordei (strain Uhor01) isolated from oats and U. tritici (strain CBS 119.19) isolated from wheat. The smut genomes were of small sizes, ranging from 18.38 to 24.63 Mb. U. hordei species experienced genome expansions due to the proliferation of transposable elements and the amount of these elements varied among the two strains. Phylogenetic analysis confirmed that Ustilago is not a monophyletic genus and, furthermore, detected misclassification of the U. tritici specimen. The comparison between smut pathogens of crop and non-crop hosts did not reveal distinct signatures, suggesting that host domestication did not play a dominant role in shaping the evolution of smuts. We found that host specialization in smut fungi likely has a complex genetic basis: different functional categories were enriched in orphans and lineage-specific selected genes. The diversification and gain/loss of effector genes are probably the most important determinants of host specificity.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 130 条
  • [11] Begerow D., 2004, Frontiers in Basidiomycote mycology, P81
  • [12] A phylogenetic hypothesis of Ustilaginomycotina based on multiple gene analyses and morphological data
    Begerow, Dominik
    Stoll, Matthias
    Bauer, Robert
    [J]. MYCOLOGIA, 2006, 98 (06) : 906 - 916
  • [13] Feature-based prediction of non-classical and leaderless protein secretion
    Bendtsen, JD
    Jensen, LJ
    Blom, N
    von Heijne, G
    Brunak, S
    [J]. PROTEIN ENGINEERING DESIGN & SELECTION, 2004, 17 (04) : 349 - 356
  • [14] Bölker M, 2001, MICROBIOL-SGM, V147, P1395, DOI 10.1099/00221287-147-6-1395
  • [15] Braithwaite K.S., 2004, Proc. Aust. Soc. Sugar Cane Technol., V26, P48
  • [16] Ustilago maydis as a Pathogen
    Brefort, Thomas
    Doehlemann, Gunther
    Mendoza-Mendoza, Artemio
    Reissmann, Stefanie
    Djamei, Armin
    Kahmann, Regine
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 2009, 47 : 423 - 445
  • [17] Oxidative Stress in Fungi: Its Function in Signal Transduction, Interaction with Plant Hosts, and Lignocellulose Degradation
    Breitenbach, Michael
    Weber, Manuela
    Rinnerthaler, Mark
    Karl, Thomas
    Breitenbach-Koller, Lore
    [J]. BIOMOLECULES, 2015, 5 (02) : 318 - 342
  • [18] Comparative and functional genomics provide insights into the pathogenicity of dermatophytic fungi
    Burmester, Anke
    Shelest, Ekaterina
    Gloeckner, Gernot
    Heddergott, Christoph
    Schindler, Susann
    Staib, Peter
    Heidel, Andrew
    Felder, Marius
    Petzold, Andreas
    Szafranski, Karol
    Feuermann, Marc
    Pedruzzi, Ivo
    Priebe, Steffen
    Groth, Marco
    Winkler, Robert
    Li, Wenjun
    Kniemeyer, Olaf
    Schroeckh, Volker
    Hertweck, Christian
    Hube, Bernhard
    White, Theodore C.
    Platzer, Matthias
    Guthke, Reinhard
    Heitman, Joseph
    Woestemeyer, Johannes
    Zipfel, Peter F.
    Monod, Michel
    Brakhage, Axel A.
    [J]. GENOME BIOLOGY, 2011, 12 (01):
  • [19] Transposable Elements versus the Fungal Genome: Impact on Whole-Genome Architecture and Transcriptional Profiles
    Castanera, Raul
    Lopez-Varas, Leticia
    Borgognone, Alessandra
    LaButti, Kurt
    Lapidus, Alla
    Schmutz, Jeremy
    Grimwood, Jane
    Perez, Gumer
    Pisabarro, Antonio G.
    Grigoriev, Igor V.
    Stajich, Jason E.
    Ramirez, Lucia
    [J]. PLOS GENETICS, 2016, 12 (06):
  • [20] Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis
    Castresana, J
    [J]. MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2000, 17 (04) : 540 - 552