Response of Soybean Offspring to a Dicamba Drift Event the Previous Year

被引:4
|
作者
Jones, Gordon T. [1 ]
Norsworthy, Jason K. [2 ]
Barber, Tom [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arkansas, Dept Crop Soli & Environm Sci, Fayetteville, AR 72701 USA
[2] Univ Arkansas, Dept Crop Soli & Environm Sci, Weed Sci, Fayetteville, AR 72701 USA
关键词
Dicamba; glyphosate; soybean; Glycine max (L.) Merr; Dicamba-resistant cotton; dicamba-resistant soybean; dicamba symptomology; leaf malformation; off-target movement; pod malformation; soybean offspring; GLYCINE-MAX; GROWTH; INJURY; 2,4-D; HERBICIDES; YIELD;
D O I
10.1017/wet.2019.2
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
In the occurrence of dicamba drift, it is not well understood what measurements from soybean plants would correlate with damage to soybean offspring; therefore, possible relationships are of great interest. Sixteen drift trials were established in 2014 and 2015 at the Northeast Research and Extension Center in Keiser, AR. A single 8-m-wide by 30- or 60-m-long pass with a high-clearance sprayer was made in each soybean field, resulting in a dicamba drift event. Seeds were collected from plants in each drift trial and planted in the field in 2015 and 2016. Data were subjected to correlation analysis to determine pairwise associations among parent and offspring observations. Auxin-like symptomology in offspring consistent with dicamba, primarily as leaf cupping, appeared in plots at the unifoliate and first trifoliate stages. Auxin-like symptoms were more prevalent in offspring collected from plants from later reproductive stages as opposed to early reproductive stages. The highest correlation coefficients occurred when parent plants were treated at the R5 growth stage. Parent mature pod malformation was correlated with offspring emergence (r=-0.37, P=0.0082), vigor (r=-0.57, P <= 0.0001), injury (r=0.93, P <= 0.0001), and percent of plants injured (r=0.92, P <= 0.0001). This research documents that soybean damaged from dicamba drift during the R1 to R6 growth stages can negatively affect offspring and that occurrence of pod malformation after dicamba drift at the R5 growth stage may be indicative of injury to the offspring.
引用
收藏
页码:41 / 50
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Soybean response to simulated dicamba/diflufenzopyr drift followed by postemergence herbicides
    Brown, Lynette R.
    Robinson, Darren E.
    Nurse, Robert E.
    Swanton, Clarence J.
    Sikkema, Peter H.
    CROP PROTECTION, 2009, 28 (06) : 539 - 542
  • [2] Quantifying vapor drift of dicamba herbicides applied to soybean
    Egan, J. Franklin
    Mortensen, David A.
    ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY, 2012, 31 (05) : 1023 - 1031
  • [3] Phytotoxicity in soybean crop caused by simulated dicamba drift
    Alves, Guilherme Sousa
    Arantes Rodrigues da Cunha, Joao Paulo
    Silva, Sergio Macedo
    Vieira, Gustavo de Souza
    Santos, Mariana Pistore
    Landim, Thiago Nunes
    Alves, Thales Cassemiro
    PESQUISA AGROPECUARIA BRASILEIRA, 2021, 56 : 1 - 7
  • [4] Simulated drift of dicamba: effect on the physiological quality of soybean seeds
    Costa, Estevam Matheus
    Zuchi, Jacson
    Abadia Ventura, Matheus Vinicius
    Pereira, Leandro Spindola
    Caetano, Geovani Borges
    Jakelaitis, Adriano
    JOURNAL OF SEED SCIENCE, 2020, 42
  • [5] Non-dicamba-resistant soybean response to multiple dicamba applications
    Meyeres, Tyler
    Lancaster, Sarah
    Kumar, Vipan
    Roozeboom, Kraig
    Peterson, Dallas
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2023, 115 (01) : 147 - 160
  • [6] Soybean (Glycine max) response to simulated drift from selected sulfonylurea herbicides, dicamba, glyphosate, and glufosinate
    Al-Khatib, K
    Peterson, D
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 1999, 13 (02) : 264 - 270
  • [7] Soybean Response to Dicamba: A Meta-Analysis
    Kniss, Andrew R.
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 32 (05) : 507 - 512
  • [8] Changes in Soybean Yield Components in Response to Dicamba
    Foster, Matthew R.
    Griffin, James L.
    AGROSYSTEMS GEOSCIENCES & ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 2 (01) : 1 - 6
  • [9] Response of non-dicamba-resistant soybean (Glycine max) varieties to dicamba
    Meyeres, Tyler
    Lancaster, Sarah
    Kumar, Vipan
    Roozeboom, Kraig
    Peterson, Dallas
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 35 (05) : 718 - 724
  • [10] Soybean response to dicamba exposure in furrow irrigation
    Grantz, Erin
    Lee, Jung Ae
    Willett, Cammy
    Norsworthy, Jason K.
    AGROSYSTEMS GEOSCIENCES & ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 3 (01)