Usefulness of Serum Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA) in evaluating response to chemotherapy in patients with advanced non small-cell lung cancer: a prospective cohort study

被引:58
作者
Arrieta, Oscar [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Villarreal-Garza, Cynthia [1 ]
Martinez-Barrera, Luis [4 ]
Morales, Marcelino [1 ]
Dorantes-Gallareta, Yuzmiren [2 ]
Pena-Curiel, Omar [2 ]
Contreras-Reyes, Susana [2 ]
Omar Macedo-Perez, Eleazar [1 ]
Alatorre-Alexander, Jorge [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Canc Inst, Dept Med Oncol, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
[2] Natl Canc Inst, Expt Oncol Lab, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
[3] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Mexico City 04510, DF, Mexico
[4] Natl Inst Resp Dis, Dept Thorac Oncol, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
关键词
Carcinoembryonic antigen; Non small-cell lung cancer; Tumor markers; Prognosis; Response prediction; PREOPERATIVE CYFRA 21-1; PROGNOSTIC-FACTORS; TUMOR-MARKERS; PREDICTIVE-VALUE; SURVIVAL; CARCINOMA; LEVEL; METASTASIS; GEFITINIB;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2407-13-254
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: High serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels are an independent prognostic factor for recurrence and survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Its role as a predictive marker of treatment response has not been widely characterized. Methods: 180 patients with advanced NSCLC (stage IIIB or Stage IV), who had an elevated CEA serum level (>10 ng/ml) at baseline and who had no more than one previous chemotherapy regimen, were included. CEA levels were measured after two treatment cycles of platinum based chemotherapy (93%) or a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (7%). We assessed the change in serum CEA levels and the association with response measured by RECIST criteria. Results: After two chemotherapy cycles, the patients who achieved an objective response (OR, 28.3%) had a reduction of CEA levels of 55.6% (95% CI 64.3-46.8) compared to its basal level, with an area under the ROC curve (AURC) of 0.945 (95% CI 0.91-0.99), and a sensitivity and specificity of 90.2 and 89.9%, respectively, for a CEA reduction of >= 14%. Patients that achieved a decrease in CEA levels >= 14% presented an overall response in 78% of cases, stable disease in 20.3% and progression in 1.7%, while patients that did not attain a reduction >= 14% had an overall response of 4.1%, stable disease of 63.6% and progression of 32.2% (p < 0.001). Patients with stable (49.4%) and progressive disease (22.2%) had an increase of CEA levels of 9.4% (95% CI 1.5-17.3) and 87.5% (95% CI 60.9-114) from baseline, respectively (p < 0.001). The AURC for progressive disease was 0.911 (95% CI 0.86-0.961), with sensitivity and specificity of 85 and 15%, respectively, for a CEA increase of >= 18%. PFS was longer in patients with a >= 14% reduction in CEA (8.7 vs. 5.1 months, p < 0.001). Reduction of CEA was not predictive of OS. Conclusions: A CEA level reduction is a sensitive and specific marker of OR, as well as a sensitive indicator for progression to chemotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC who had an elevated CEA at baseline and had received no more than one chemotherapy regimen. A 14% decrease in CEA levels is associated with a longer PFS.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], CA CANC J CLIN, DOI DOI 10.3322/CAAC.20107
[2]   Decline in serum carcinoembryonic antigen and cytokeratin 19 fragment during chemotherapy predicts objective response and survival in patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer [J].
Ardizzoni, Andrea ;
Cafferata, Mara A. ;
Tiseo, Marcello ;
Filiberti, Rosangela ;
Marroni, Paola ;
Grossi, Francesco ;
Paganuzzi, Michela .
CANCER, 2006, 107 (12) :2842-2849
[3]   Brain metastasis development and poor survival associated with carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a prospective analysis [J].
Arrieta, Oscar ;
Saavedra-Perez, David ;
Kuri, Roberto ;
Aviles-Salas, Alejandro ;
Martinez, Luis ;
Mendoza-Posada, Daniel ;
Castillo, Patricia ;
Astorga, Alma ;
Guzman, Enrique ;
De la Garza, Jaime .
BMC CANCER, 2009, 9
[4]   Preoperative CYFRA 21-1 and CEA as Prognostic Factors in Patients with Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer [J].
Blankenburg, Florian ;
Hatz, Rudolf ;
Nagel, Dorothea ;
Ankerst, Donna ;
Reinmiedl, Judith ;
Gruber, Christine ;
Seidel, Dietrich ;
Stieber, Petra .
TUMOR BIOLOGY, 2008, 29 (04) :272-277
[5]   Prognostic factors in non-small cell lung cancer - A decade of progress [J].
Brundage, MD ;
Davies, D ;
Mackillop, WJ .
CHEST, 2002, 122 (03) :1037-1057
[6]   Serum tumor markers as predictors for survival in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with gefitinib [J].
Chiu, Chao-Hua ;
Shih, Yu-Ning ;
Tsai, Chun-Ming ;
Liou, Jia-Ling ;
Chen, Yuh-Min ;
Perng, Reury-Perng .
LUNG CANCER, 2007, 57 (02) :213-221
[7]   Colorectal cancer surveillance: 2005 update of an American Society of Clinical Oncology practice guideline [J].
Desch, CE ;
Benson, A ;
Somerfield, MR ;
Flynn, PJ ;
Krause, C ;
Loprinzi, CL ;
Minsky, BD ;
Pfister, DG ;
Virgo, KS ;
Petrelli, NJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (33) :8512-8519
[8]   New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1) [J].
Eisenhauer, E. A. ;
Therasse, P. ;
Bogaerts, J. ;
Schwartz, L. H. ;
Sargent, D. ;
Ford, R. ;
Dancey, J. ;
Arbuck, S. ;
Gwyther, S. ;
Mooney, M. ;
Rubinstein, L. ;
Shankar, L. ;
Dodd, L. ;
Kaplan, R. ;
Lacombe, D. ;
Verweij, J. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2009, 45 (02) :228-247
[9]   Interobserver and intraobserver variability in measurement of non-small-cell carcinoma lung lesions: Implications for assessment of tumor response [J].
Erasmus, JJ ;
Gladish, GW ;
Broemeling, L ;
Sabloff, BS ;
Truong, MT ;
Herbst, RS ;
Munden, RF .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 21 (13) :2574-2582
[10]  
Foa P, 1999, ANTICANCER RES, V19, P3613