Species interactions constrain geographic range expansion over evolutionary time

被引:205
作者
Pigot, Alex L. [1 ]
Tobias, Joseph A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Dept Zool, Edward Grey Inst, Oxford OX1 3PS, England
关键词
Biotic interactions; competitive exclusion; dispersal; geographical range limits; secondary sympatry; traits; SECONDARY SYMPATRY; CLIMATE-CHANGE; BODY-SIZE; ECOLOGY; BIRDS; DIVERSIFICATION; COMMUNITIES; COEXISTENCE; COMPETITION; DIVERGENCE;
D O I
10.1111/ele.12043
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Whether biotic interactions limit geographic ranges has long been controversial, and traditional analyses of static distribution patterns have made little progress towards resolving this debate. Here, we use a novel phylogenetic approach to test whether biotic interactions constrain the transition to secondary sympatry following speciation. Applying this temporal framework to a diverse clade of passerine birds (Furnariidae), we reject models of geographic range overlap limited purely by dispersal or environmental constraints, and instead show that rates of secondary sympatry are positively associated with both the phylogenetic and morphological distance between species. Thus, transition rates to sympatry increase with time since divergence and accelerate as the ecological differences between species accumulate. Taken together, these results provide strong empirical evidence that biotic interactions and primarily ecological competition limit species distributions across large spatial and temporal scales. They also offer phylogenetic and trait-based metrics by which these interactions can be incorporated into ecological forecasting models.
引用
收藏
页码:330 / 338
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1975, ECOLOGY EVOLUTION
[2]   The importance of biotic interactions for modelling species distributions under climate change [J].
Araujo, Miguel B. ;
Luoto, Miska .
GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY, 2007, 16 (06) :743-753
[3]   The co-distribution of species in relation to the neutral theory of community ecology [J].
Bell, G .
ECOLOGY, 2005, 86 (07) :1757-1770
[4]   BODY SIZE AND COEXISTENCE IN DESERT RODENTS - CHANCE OR COMMUNITY STRUCTURE [J].
BOWERS, MA ;
BROWN, JH .
ECOLOGY, 1982, 63 (02) :391-400
[5]   Does phylogenetic relatedness influence the strength of competition among vascular plants? [J].
Cahill, James F., Jr. ;
Kembel, Steven W. ;
Lamb, Eric G. ;
Keddy, Paul A. .
PERSPECTIVES IN PLANT ECOLOGY EVOLUTION AND SYSTEMATICS, 2008, 10 (01) :41-50
[6]   The community context of species' borders: ecological and evolutionary perspectives [J].
Case, TJ ;
Holt, RD ;
McPeek, MA ;
Keitt, TH .
OIKOS, 2005, 108 (01) :28-46
[7]   The merging of community ecology and phylogenetic biology [J].
Cavender-Bares, Jeannine ;
Kozak, Kenneth H. ;
Fine, Paul V. A. ;
Kembel, Steven W. .
ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2009, 12 (07) :693-715
[8]  
Cody M. L, 1974, COMPETITION STRUCTUR
[9]  
Colwell R. K., 1984, ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITI, P1
[10]   THE ASSEMBLY OF SPECIES COMMUNITIES - CHANCE OR COMPETITION [J].
CONNOR, EF ;
SIMBERLOFF, D .
ECOLOGY, 1979, 60 (06) :1132-1140