High-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Back Pain Patients: Results of a Prospective Multicenter European Clinical Study

被引:242
|
作者
Van Buyten, Jean-Pierre [1 ]
Al-Kaisy, Adnan [2 ]
Smet, Iris [1 ]
Palmisani, Stefano [2 ]
Smith, Thomas [2 ]
机构
[1] AZ Nikolaas, Dept Anesthesia & Pain Management, St Niklaas, Belgium
[2] Guys & St Thomas Hosp, Pain Management & Neuromodulat Ctr, London SE1 9RT, England
来源
NEUROMODULATION | 2013年 / 16卷 / 01期
关键词
axial back pain; failed back surgery syndrome; high-frequency stimulation; low back pain; spinal cord stimulation; SURGERY SYNDROME; CONTROLLED-TRIAL; COMPLICATIONS;
D O I
10.1111/ner.12006
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Objective The objective of this prospective, open-label, multicenter European clinical trial was to quantify the efficacy and safety of a spinal cord stimulation (SCS) system that utilizes high-frequency (up to 10kHz) waveforms, which do not produce paresthesia, for the treatment of chronic, intractable pain of the back and/or limbs. Material and Methods Eighty-three patients, with significant back pain, were recruited for a trial of high-frequency stimulation through two percutaneous eight-contact epidural leads. Patients' pain ratings, disability, sleep disturbances, and satisfaction, as well as complication rates, were assessed for up to six months. Results After a trial period, 88% (72 out of 82) of patients reported a significant improvement in visual analog scale (VAS) scores and underwent permanent implantation of the high-frequency SCS system. Mean back pain VAS of 8.4 was reduced to 2.7 at six months (p< 0.001). Mean leg pain VAS of 5.4 was reduced to 1.4 at six months (p< 0.001). Seventy-four percent of patients had greater than 50% back pain relief at six months. There were significant improvements in Oswestry disability score and sleep, and reductions in pain medication use. Adverse events observed were those seen with conventional SCS therapylead migration, wound infection, and pain around implant site. Conclusions In a cohort of patients with difficult-to-treat chronic back pain, high-frequency SCS provided significant and sustained low back pain and leg pain relief to more than 70% of treated subjects. Notably, this was achieved without paresthesia. Patients also experienced significant improvement in disability and sleep. Overall, the results confirm a favorable safety and efficacy profile of the high-frequency SCS system.
引用
收藏
页码:59 / 66
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Spinal cord stimulation: A valuable treatment for chronic failed back surgery patients
    Devulder, J
    DeLaat, M
    VanBastelaere, M
    Rolly, G
    JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 1997, 13 (05) : 296 - 301
  • [32] Advances in Spinal Cord Stimulation for Treatment of Chronic Pain
    Jung J.H.
    Ignatius M.I.
    Schulz C.F.
    Ornelas C.C.
    Current Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Reports, 2013, 1 (2) : 120 - 124
  • [33] High-frequency spinal cord stimulation in failed back surgery syndrome patients with predominant low back pain-single-center experience
    Motov, Stefan
    Aftahy, Kaywan
    Joerger, Ann-Kathrin
    Wagner, Arthur
    Meyer, Bernhard
    Shiban, Ehab
    NEUROSURGICAL REVIEW, 2021, 44 (05) : 2809 - 2818
  • [34] High-frequency spinal cord stimulation in failed back surgery syndrome patients with predominant low back pain—single-center experience
    Stefan Motov
    Kaywan Aftahy
    Ann-Kathrin Jörger
    Arthur Wagner
    Bernhard Meyer
    Ehab Shiban
    Neurosurgical Review, 2021, 44 : 2809 - 2818
  • [35] TREATMENT OF CHRONIC LOW-BACK AND RADICULAR PAIN BY SPINAL-CORD STIMULATION - LONG-TERM RESULTS
    HIEU, PD
    PERSON, H
    HOUIDI, K
    RODRIGUEZ, V
    VALLEE, B
    BESSON, G
    REVUE DU RHUMATISME, 1994, 61 (04): : 271 - 277
  • [36] High-frequency spinal cord stimulation in treatment of phantom lower limb pain following spinal cord injury: A case report
    Park, Rachel J.
    Boesel, Tillman W.
    Di Ieva, Antonio
    PAIN PRACTICE, 2025, 25 (01)
  • [37] Differences in EEG patterns between tonic and high frequency spinal cord stimulation in chronic pain patients
    Telkes, Llknur
    Hancu, Maria
    Paniccioli, Steven
    Grey, Rachael
    Briotte, Michael
    McCarthy, Kevin
    Raviv, Nataly
    Pilitsis, Julie G.
    CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2020, 131 (08) : 1731 - 1740
  • [38] Cost effectiveness of a novel 10 khz high-frequency spinal cord stimulation system in patients with failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS)
    Annemans, Lieven
    Van Buyten, Jean-Pierre
    Smith, Thomas
    Al-Kaisy, Adnan
    Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants, 2014, 24 (2-3) : 173 - 184
  • [39] High-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation in Surgery-Naive PatientsA Prospective Single-Center Study
    Ahmadi, Sebastian A.
    Vesper, Jan
    Schu, Stefan
    Slotty, Philipp J.
    NEUROMODULATION, 2017, 20 (04): : 348 - 353
  • [40] Spinal Cord Stimulation With Additional Peripheral Nerve/Field Stimulation Versus Spinal Cord Stimulation Alone on Back Pain and Quality of Life in Patients With Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome
    van Heteren, Esther P. Z.
    van Roosendaal, Bert-Kristian W. P.
    van Gorp, Eric-Jan J. A. A.
    Bronkhorst, Ewald M.
    Kallewaard, Jan Willem
    Wegener, Jessica T.
    Burger, Katja
    Teernstra, Otto P. M.
    Buschman, Hendrik P. J.
    Hamm-Faber, Tanja E.
    Vissers, Kris C. P.
    NEUROMODULATION, 2023, 26 (03): : 658 - 665