Performance criteria to evaluate air quality modeling applications

被引:80
作者
Thunis, P. [1 ]
Pederzoli, A. [2 ]
Pernigotti, D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Commiss European Communities, JRC, Inst Environm & Sustainabil, Climate Change & Air Qual Unit, I-21027 Ispra, VA, Italy
[2] Univ Brescia, DII, I-25123 Brescia, Italy
关键词
Statistical model evaluation; Performance criteria; Air quality modeling; Quality objectives; Observation uncertainty; SKILL; UNCERTAINTY;
D O I
10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.05.043
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
A set of statistical indicators fit for air quality model evaluation is selected based on experience and literature: The Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), the bias, the Standard Deviation (SD) and the correlation coefficient (R). Among these the RMSE is proposed as the key one for the description of the model skill. Model Performance Criteria (MPC) to investigate whether model results are 'good enough' for a given application are calculated based on the observation uncertainty (U). The basic concept is to allow for model results a similar margin of tolerance (in terms of uncertainty) as for observations. U is pollutant, concentration level and station dependent, therefore the proposed MPC are normalized by U. Some composite diagrams are adapted or introduced to visualize model performance in terms of the proposed MPC and are illustrated in a real modeling application. The Target diagram, used to visualize the RMSE, is adapted with a new normalization on its axis, while complementary diagrams are proposed. In this first application the dependence of U on concentrations level is ignored, and an assumption on the pollutant dependent relative error is made. The advantages of this new approach are finally described. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:476 / 482
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
AirBase, 1997, EUROPEAN AIR QUALITY
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2009, EPA/100/K-09/003
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2005, D6589 ASTM INT
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2007, GUIDANCE USE MODELS
[5]  
AQD, 2008, OFFICIAL J
[6]   Procedures for estimation of modelling uncertainty in air quality assessment [J].
Borrego, C. ;
Monteiro, A. ;
Ferreira, J. ;
Miranda, A. I. ;
Costa, A. M. ;
Carvalho, A. C. ;
Lopes, M. .
ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL, 2008, 34 (05) :613-620
[7]   PM and light extinction model performance metrics, goals, and criteria for three-dimensional air quality models [J].
Boylan, James W. ;
Russell, Armistead G. .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2006, 40 (26) :4946-4959
[8]  
Chang J., 2004, METEOROLOGY ATMOSPHE, V87
[9]   Evaluation of a CMAQ simulation at high resolution over the UK for the calendar year 2003 [J].
Chemel, C. ;
Sokhi, R. S. ;
Yu, Y. ;
Hayman, G. D. ;
Vincent, K. J. ;
Dore, A. J. ;
Tang, Y. S. ;
Prain, H. D. ;
Fisher, B. E. A. .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2010, 44 (24) :2927-2939
[10]  
DENBY B., 2010, D - Guidance on the use of models for the European Air Quality Directive: A working document of the Forum for Air Quality Modelling in Europe FAIRMODE. Version 5.1