Short-term efficacy of high intensity group and individual education in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized single-center trial

被引:9
作者
Reale, R. [1 ]
Tumminia, A. [1 ]
Romeo, L. [1 ]
La Spina, N. [1 ]
Baratta, R. [2 ]
Padova, G. [2 ]
Tomaselli, L. [2 ]
Frittitta, L. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Catania, Garibaldi Hosp, Dept Clin & Expt Med, Endocrinol, Via Palermo 636, I-95122 Catania, Italy
[2] Garibaldi Hosp, Endocrinol Unit, Catania, Italy
[3] Garibaldi Hosp, Diabet Obes & Dietet Ctr, Catania, Italy
关键词
Type; 2; diabetes; Conversation map; Individual education; Treatment satisfaction; LIFE-STYLE INTERVENTION; TREATMENT SATISFACTION; GROUP CARE; MANAGEMENT; MELLITUS; PEOPLE; IMPACT; REINFORCEMENT; METAANALYSIS; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1007/s40618-018-0929-6
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
PurposeThe aim of this randomized study was to examine the efficacy of two high intensity educational programs: the conversation maps-based (CM) education and the individual education (IE), compared to usual care (UC) in a cohort of type 2 diabetic (T2DM) patients.MethodsNinety T2DM outpatients (30 per group) were randomized and 79 finished the study and were analyzed. The CM and IE groups received four educational sessions at 0, 4, 8 and 12weeks, while the UC group received two brief individual sessions at 0 and 12weeks. We evaluated glycemic control (HbA1c), diabetes treatment, body mass index (BMI) and carried out a questionnaire survey at three time points (before intervention, at 12 and at 32weeks) to assess patients' satisfaction, attitudes toward diabetes and dietary knowledge.ResultsAll the three groups showed a significant and comparable reduction of both HbA1c and BMI. Diabetes therapy needed to be reinforced in a higher percentage of cases (39.3%) among UC patients compared to the IE (14.8%; p=0.04) and the CM (8.3%; p=0.01) groups. At 32weeks Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction (DTSQ Q1+Q4-8) significantly improved in the CM group (25.84.5 vs. 22.4 +/- 6.0; p<0.01) and attitudes toward diabetes (ATT19) significantly improved in the IE group (58.0 +/- 4.7 vs. 55.3 +/- 5.1; p=0.02).Conclusionsp id=Par4 Our trial provides preliminary data regarding the efficacy of structured group and individual education on achieving better glyco-metabolic control without drug therapy reinforcement and with positive effects on patients' attitude and treatment satisfaction.
引用
收藏
页码:403 / 409
页数:7
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Lifestyle Management: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2018 [J].
不详 .
DIABETES CARE, 2018, 41 :S38-S50
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2001, COCHRANE DB SYST REV
[3]   Impact of Reinforcement of Diabetes Self-Care on Poorly Controlled Diabetes A Randomized Controlled Trial [J].
Beverly, Elizabeth A. ;
Fitzgerald, Shane M. ;
Brooks, Kelly M. ;
Hultgren, Brittney A. ;
Ganda, Om P. ;
Munshi, Medha ;
Weinger, Katie .
DIABETES EDUCATOR, 2013, 39 (04) :504-514
[4]  
Chinenye Sunny, 2013, Indian J Endocrinol Metab, V17, P1009, DOI 10.4103/2230-8210.122613
[5]  
Ciardullo Anna Vittoria, 2010, Recenti Progressi in Medicina, V101, P471
[6]  
da Vico Letizia, 2010, Monaldi Arch Chest Dis, V74, P140
[7]   RETRACTED: Group based training for self-management strategies in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus - art. no. CD003417.pub2 (Retracted Article) [J].
Deakin, T ;
McShane, C ;
Cade, JE ;
Williams, RDRR .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2005, (02)
[8]   Individual patient education for people with type 2 diabetes mellitus [J].
Duke, Sally-Anne S. ;
Colagiuri, Stephen ;
Colagiuri, Ruth .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2009, (01)
[9]   Are current psychometric tools suitable for measuring outcomes of diabetes education? [J].
Eigenmann, C. A. ;
Colagiuri, R. ;
Skinner, T. C. ;
Trevena, L. .
DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2009, 26 (04) :425-436
[10]   Diabetes patient education: a meta-analysis and meta-regression [J].
Ellis, SE ;
Speroff, T ;
Dittus, RS ;
Brown, A ;
Pichert, JW ;
Elasy, TA .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2004, 52 (01) :97-105