Conflict between entrepreneurship and open science, and the transition of scientific norms

被引:21
作者
Shibayama, Sotaro [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Georgia Inst Technol, Sch Publ Policy, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
[2] Univ Tokyo, Res Ctr Adv Sci & Technol, Meguro Ku, Tokyo 1538904, Japan
[3] Natl Inst Sci & Technol Policy NISTEP, Chiyoda Ku, Tokyo 1000013, Japan
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
Entrepreneurship; Academic capitalism; Commercialism; Open science; Scientific norm; INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY; ACADEMIC SCIENCE; NATIONAL-SURVEY; LIFE SCIENCES; UNIVERSITIES; TECHNOLOGY; ECONOMICS; PATENTS; COMMERCIALIZATION; COLLABORATION;
D O I
10.1007/s10961-010-9202-7
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
In the trend of academic entrepreneurship, practical and direct contribution of university research to the society has been emphasized, in which university scientists have increasingly engaged in commercial activities, university-industry relationships, and technology transfers. However, this trend has aroused concern about a potentially negative impact on the tradition of open science. Drawing on a survey data of 698 Japanese natural scientists, this study analyzes the behaviors and norms of university scientists under the influence of university interventions for entrepreneurship, whereby examining the compatibility between entrepreneurship and open science. The results indicate that entrepreneurial interventions have facilitated scientists' norm for practical contribution, and consequently, their involvement in commercial activities and ties with industry. Then, some, but not all, of these entrepreneurial activities have deterred cooperative or open relationships between scientists. However, the results suggest that the entrepreneurial interventions have not deteriorated the traditional norm for open science. Further analyses indicate that the two norms for practical contribution and for open science are determined independently, implying that academic entrepreneurship can be promoted without deteriorating open science.
引用
收藏
页码:508 / 531
页数:24
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]   THE MANAGEMENT OF INNOVATION [J].
AGHION, P ;
TIROLE, J .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1994, 109 (04) :1185-1209
[2]   Putting patents in context: Exploring knowledge transfer from MIT [J].
Agrawal, A ;
Henderson, R .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2002, 48 (01) :44-60
[3]  
[Anonymous], AUTM US LIC ACT SURV
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1972, Invisible colleges: diffusion of knowledge in scientific communities
[5]  
Arora A., 2001, MARKETS TECHNOLOGY
[6]  
Blume S., 1974, POLITICAL SOCIOLOGY
[7]   Data withholding in genetics and the other life sciences: Prevalences and predictors [J].
Blumenthal, D ;
Campbell, EG ;
Gokhale, M ;
Yucel, R ;
Clarridge, B ;
Hilgartner, S ;
Holtzman, NA .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2006, 81 (02) :137-145
[8]   Withholding research results in academic life science - Evidence from a national survey of faculty [J].
Blumenthal, D ;
Campbell, EG ;
Anderson, MS ;
Causino, N ;
Louis, KS .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1997, 277 (15) :1224-1228
[9]   GUIDELINES FOR SUCCESSFULLY TRANSFERRING GOVERNMENT-SPONSORED INNOVATIONS [J].
BROWN, MA ;
BERRY, LG ;
GOEL, RK .
RESEARCH POLICY, 1991, 20 (02) :121-143
[10]   Data withholding in academic medicine: characteristics of faculty denied access to research results and biomaterials [J].
Campbell, EG ;
Weissman, JS ;
Causino, N ;
Blumenthal, D .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2000, 29 (02) :303-312