Numerical Investigations on the Behavior of Back-to-Back Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls: Effect of Structural Components

被引:0
|
作者
Djabri, Mohamed [1 ,2 ]
Benmebarek, Sadok [2 ]
机构
[1] Larbi Tebessi Univ Tebessa, Dept Earth & Universes Sci, Tebessa 12002, Algeria
[2] Biskra Univ, NMISSI Lab, Dept Civil Engn & Hydraul, BP 145, Biskra 07000, Algeria
关键词
Back-to-back walls; Tensile load; Reinforced soil; Seismic load; Wall displacement; RETAINING WALLS; GEOSYNTHETICS; REINFORCEMENT;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Over the years, the behavior of Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls (MSEWs) has been intensively studied, where several design guidelines are now available. However, for Back-to-Back Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls (BBMSEWs), widely encountered in road construction projects, a survey of the literature shows that a little attention has been paid to the behavior of this type of walls. The existing design manuals and the few numerical investigations do not provide a clear answer on the seismic response of BBMSEWs. Given their importance in transportation systems, understanding the dynamic behavior of BBMSEWs becomes a necessity. For this purpose, this paper reports results from numerical analysis that was carried out to evaluate the influence of numerous parameters of structural components, such as backfill type, wall facing type, reinforcement stiffness and distance between opposing walls, on the static response and dynamic response of an idealized 6 m high BBMSEW with 12-m width. The length of reinforcement is 4.2 m, so the distance between opposing walls is 3.6 m. In this study, geotechnical Finite Element software PLAXIS 2D was adopted, while wall displacement and tensile load in reinforcement were selected as criteria of stability. Based on the findings, it was shown that using stiffer reinforcement leads to a significant decrease in horizontal wall displacement and involves a less reduction of maximum tensile loads in reinforcement. When flexible reinforcements were used, the type of facing wall should have a significant effect on the BBMSEW behavior. Under self-weight, the theoretical solutions overestimate tensile load in the reinforcements. By decreasing the distance between opposing walls to zero, the reinforcements from both sides would meet in the middle and the magnitude of the displacement has been significantly reduced. In this case, designers might be tempted to use single layers of reinforcement that are connected to both wall facings. In this special arrangement of reinforcement, it was revealed that connecting two opposing walls reduces only the maximum horizontal displacement, while the effect of axial rigidity of reinforcement was found to be negligible.
引用
收藏
页码:391 / 405
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Numerical investigations on the behavior of back-to-back mechanically stabilized earth walls: Effect of structural components
    Djabri, Mohamed
    Benmebarek, Sadok
    Jordan Journal of Civil Engineering, 2020, 14 (03): : 391 - 405
  • [2] Numerical Study of the Behavior of Back-to-Back Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls
    Lajevardi, Seyed Hamid
    Malekmohammadi, Khashayar
    Dias, Daniel
    GEOTECHNICS, 2021, 1 (01): : 18 - 37
  • [3] Behavior of back-to-back mechanically stabilized earth walls as railway embankments
    Yazdandoust, M.
    Daftari, F.
    GEOSYNTHETICS INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 31 (05) : 785 - 805
  • [4] Analysis of back-to-back mechanically stabilized earth walls
    Han, Jie
    Leshchinsky, Dov
    GEOTEXTILES AND GEOMEMBRANES, 2010, 28 (03) : 262 - 267
  • [5] Interaction analysis of back-to-back mechanically stabilized earth walls
    Benmebarek, Sadok
    Attallaoui, Samir
    Benmebarek, Naima
    JOURNAL OF ROCK MECHANICS AND GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING, 2016, 8 (05) : 697 - 702
  • [6] Interaction analysis of back-to-back mechanically stabilized earth walls
    Sadok Benmebarek
    Samir Attallaoui
    Na?ma Benmebarek
    Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 2016, 8 (05) : 697 - 702
  • [7] Technical Review of the Back-to-Back Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls
    Han, Jie
    Alsharari, Turki
    GEO-CONGRESS 2023: FOUNDATIONS, RETAINING STRUCTURES, AND GEOSYNTHETICS, 2023, : 359 - 368
  • [8] Influence of different parameters on back-to-back mechanically stabilized earth walls
    Malekmohammadi, Khashayar
    Lajevardi, Seyed Hamid
    Dias, Daniel
    GEOSYNTHETICS: LEADING THE WAY TO A RESILIENT PLANET, 12ICG 2023, 2024, : 977 - 983
  • [9] Numerical analysis of back-to-back mechanically stabilized earth walls subjected to dual railroad loadings
    Rahmouni, Ouassim
    Belkebir, Malak
    Baazouzi, Messaoud
    Belhocine, Malika
    Mabrouki, Abdelhak
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING, 2025, 19 (1-3) : 50 - 61
  • [10] Fragility Curves for Seismic Vulnerability of Back-to-Back Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls
    Rahimi, Maryam
    Firoozfar, Alireza
    Alielahi, Hamid
    GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2024, 42 (08) : 7525 - 7552