Validation of Three-dimensional Electronic Portal Imaging Device-based PerFRACTION™ Software for Patient-Specific Quality Assurance

被引:7
作者
Sait, A. Aziz [1 ]
Figueredo, Jason [2 ]
Jones, Glenn W. [4 ]
Jones, Kai [3 ]
McGowan, Thomas [1 ]
Kapatoes, Jeff [2 ]
Ramaseshan, Ramani [5 ]
机构
[1] Canc Ctr Eastern Caribbean, Dept Radiat Oncol, St Johns, Antigua & Barbu
[2] Sun Nucl Corp, Melbourne, FL USA
[3] Columbia Univ, Vagelos Coll Phys & Surg, New York, NY USA
[4] Univ West Indies, Sch Clin Med & Res, Nassau, Bahamas
[5] BC Canc Agcy, Abbotsford Canc Ctr, Dept Med Phys, Vancouver, BC V2S 0C2, Canada
关键词
EPID; In-vivo dosimetry; PerFRACTION (TM); Phantoms; Validation; RADIATION-THERAPY; RADIOTHERAPY;
D O I
10.4103/jmp.JMP_76_18
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: PerFRACTION (TM) is a three-dimensional (3D) in vivo electronic portal imaging device-based dosimetry software. To validate the software, three phantoms with different inserts (2D array, ionization chamber, and inhomogeneity materials) were constructed to evaluate point dose and finance map. Materials and Methods: Phantoms underwent independent computed tomography simulation for planning and received repetitive fractions of volumetric modulated arc therapy, simulating prostate treatment. Fluence and absolute point dose measurements, PerFRACTION (TM) reconstructed doses, and the dose predictions of the planning system were compared. Results: There was concordance between ionization chamber and PerFRACTION (TM) 3D absolute point dose measurements. Close agreement was also obtained between X- and Y-axis dose profiles with PerFRACTION (TM) calculated doses, MapCHECK measured doses, and planning system predicted doses. Setup shifts significantly influenced 2D gamma passing rates in PerFRACTIONT (TM) software. Conclusions: PerFRACTION (TM) appears reliable and valid under experimental conditions in air and with phantoms.
引用
收藏
页码:16 / 20
页数:5
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2016, IAEA HUM HLTH SER, V31, P297
[2]   QUANTITATIVE ANALYSES OF NORMAL TISSUE EFFECTS IN THE CLINIC (QUANTEC): AN INTRODUCTION TO THE SCIENTIFIC ISSUES [J].
Bentzen, Soren M. ;
Constine, Louis S. ;
Deasy, Joseph O. ;
Eisbruch, Avi ;
Jackson, Andrew ;
Marks, Lawrence B. ;
Ten Haken, Randall K. ;
Yorke, Ellen D. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2010, 76 (03) :S3-S9
[3]   The role of radiotherapy in cancer treatment - Estimating optimal utilization from a review of evidence-based clinical guidelines [J].
Delaney, G ;
Jacob, S ;
Featherstone, C ;
Barton, M .
CANCER, 2005, 104 (06) :1129-1137
[4]  
International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements, 2010, J ICRU, V10
[5]   Real-time dose computation: GPU-accelerated source modeling and superposition/convolution [J].
Jacques, Robert ;
Wong, John ;
Taylor, Russell ;
McNutt, Todd .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2011, 38 (01) :294-305
[6]   Towards real-time radiation therapy: GPU accelerated superposition/convolution [J].
Jacques, Robert ;
Taylor, Russell ;
Wong, John ;
McNutt, Todd .
COMPUTER METHODS AND PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE, 2010, 98 (03) :285-292
[7]   A technique for the quantitative evaluation of dose distributions [J].
Low, DA ;
Harms, WB ;
Mutic, S ;
Purdy, JA .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1998, 25 (05) :656-661
[8]  
Reilly AJ, 2017, UK RAD C RAD ONC C M
[9]  
Sait AA, 2016, MED PHY INT J, V4, P328
[10]  
SunCHECK Patient, 2017, D041316 SUN NUCL COR