Enrollment of Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants in a Clinical Research Study May Not Be Representative

被引:88
作者
Rich, Wade [1 ]
Finer, Neil N. [1 ]
Gantz, Marie G. [2 ,3 ]
Newman, Nancy S.
Hensman, Angelita M. [4 ]
Hale, Ellen C. [5 ,6 ]
Auten, Kathy J. [7 ]
Schibler, Kurt [8 ,9 ]
Faix, Roger G. [10 ]
Laptook, Abbot R. [5 ,6 ]
Yoder, Bradley A. [10 ]
Das, Abhik [2 ]
Shankaran, Seetha [11 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
[2] RTI Int, Stat & Epidemiol Unit, Rockville, MD USA
[3] Case Western Reserve Univ, Rainbow Babies & Childrens Hosp, Dept Pediat, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[4] Brown Univ, Women & Infants Hosp, Dept Pediat, Providence, RI 02908 USA
[5] Emory Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pediat, Atlanta, GA USA
[6] Childrens Healthcare Atlanta, Atlanta, GA USA
[7] Duke Univ, Dept Pediat, Durham, NC 27706 USA
[8] Cincinnati Childrens Hosp, Med Ctr, Dept Pediat, Cincinnati, OH USA
[9] Univ Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH USA
[10] Univ Utah, Sch Med, Dept Pediat, Div Neonatol, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[11] Wayne State Univ, Dept Pediat, Detroit, MI 48202 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
antenatal steroids; clinical research/trials; informed consent; neonatal; EXTREMELY PRETERM INFANTS; CONSENT; TRIALS;
D O I
10.1542/peds.2011-2121
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The Surfactant Positive Airway Pressure and Pulse Oximetry Randomized Trial (SUPPORT) antenatal consent study demonstrated that mothers of infants enrolled in the SUPPORT trial had significantly different demographics and exposure to antenatal steroids compared with mothers of eligible, but not enrolled infants. The objective of this analysis was to compare the outcomes of bronchopulmonary dysplasia, severe retinopathy of prematurity, severe intraventricular hemorrhage or periventricular leukomalacia (IVH/PVL), death, and death/severe IVH/PVL for infants enrolled in SUPPORT in comparison with eligible, but not enrolled infants. METHODS: Perinatal characteristics and neonatal outcomes were compared for enrolled and eligible but not enrolled infants in bivariate analyses. Models were created to test the effect of enrollment in SUPPORT on outcomes, controlling for perinatal characteristics. RESULTS: There were 1316 infants enrolled in SUPPORT; 3053 infants were eligible, but not enrolled. In unadjusted analyses, enrolled infants had significantly lower rates of death before discharge, severe IVH/PVL, death/severe IVH/PVL (all < 0.001), and bronchopulmonary dysplasia (P = .003) in comparison with eligible, but not enrolled infants. The rate of severe retinopathy of prematurity was not significantly different. After adjustment for perinatal factors, enrollment in the trial was not a significant predictor of any of the tested clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this analysis demonstrate significant outcome differences between enrolled and eligible but not enrolled infants in a trial using antenatal consent, which were likely due to enrollment bias resulting from the antenatal consent process. Additional research and regulatory review need to be conducted to ensure that large moderate-risk trials that require antenatal consent can be conducted in such a way as to ensure the generalizability of results. Pediatrics 2012; 129:480-484
引用
收藏
页码:480 / 484
页数:5
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]   Target Ranges of Oxygen Saturation in Extremely Preterm Infants. [J].
Carlo, Waldemar A. ;
Finer, Neil N. ;
Walsh, Michele C. ;
Rich, Wade ;
Gantz, Marie G. ;
Laptook, Abbot R. ;
Yoder, Bradley A. ;
Faix, Roger G. ;
Das, Abhik ;
Poole, W. Kenneth ;
Schibler, Kurt ;
Newman, Nancy S. ;
Ambalavanan, Namasivayam ;
Frantz, Ivan D., III ;
Piazza, Anthony J. ;
Sanchez, Pablo J. ;
Morris, Brenda H. ;
Laroia, Nirupama ;
Phelps, Dale L. ;
Poindexter, Brenda B. ;
Cotten, C. Michael ;
Van Meurs, Krisa P. ;
Duara, Shahnaz ;
Narendran, Vivek ;
Sood, Beena G. ;
O'Shea, T. Michael ;
Bell, Edward F. ;
Ehrenkranz, Richard A. ;
Watterberg, Kristi L. ;
Higgins, Rosemary D. ;
Jobe, A. H. ;
Caplan, M. S. ;
Oh, W. ;
Hensman, A. M. ;
Gingras, D. ;
Barnett, S. ;
Lillie, S. ;
Francis, K. ;
Andrews, D. ;
Angela, K. ;
Fanaroff, A. A. ;
Siner, B. S. ;
Zadell, A. ;
DiFiore, J. ;
Donovan, E. F. ;
Bridges, K. ;
Alexander, B. ;
Grisby, C. ;
Mersmann, M. W. ;
Mincey, H. L. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2010, 362 (21) :1959-1969
[2]  
DAVIS S, 1985, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V56, P1710, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19851001)56:7<1710::AID-CNCR2820560741>3.0.CO
[3]  
2-T
[4]  
Finer NN, 2010, NEW ENGL J MED, V362, P1970, DOI 10.1056/NEJMoa0911783
[5]   Is the concept of informed consent applicable to clinical research involving critically ill patients? [J].
Luce, JM .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2003, 31 (03) :S153-S160
[6]   Antenatal Consent in the SUPPORT Trial: Challenges, Costs, and Representative Enrollment [J].
Rich, Wade D. ;
Auten, Kathy J. ;
Gantz, Marie G. ;
Hale, Ellen C. ;
Hensman, Angelita M. ;
Newman, Nancy S. ;
Finer, Neil N. .
PEDIATRICS, 2010, 126 (01) :E215-E221
[7]   Do sick newborn infants benefit from participation in a randomized clinical trial? [J].
Schmidt, B ;
Gillie, P ;
Caco, C ;
Roberts, J ;
Roberts, R .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 1999, 134 (02) :151-155
[8]   Is informed consent always necessary for randomized, controlled trials? [J].
Truog, RD ;
Robinson, W ;
Randolph, A ;
Morris, A .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1999, 340 (10) :804-807
[9]  
US Department of Health and Human Services, GEN REQ INF CONS