Multimodal data indicators for capturing cognitive, motivational, and emotional learning processes: A systematic literature review

被引:48
作者
Noroozi, Omid [1 ,2 ]
Pijeira-Diaz, Hector J. [1 ]
Sobocinski, Marta [1 ]
Dindar, Muhterem [1 ]
Jarvela, Sanna [1 ]
Kirschner, Paul A. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oulu, Oulu, Finland
[2] Wageningen Univ & Res, Educ & Learning Sci, POB 8130, NL-6700 EW Wageningen, Netherlands
[3] Open Univ Netherlands, NL-6419 AT Heerlen, Netherlands
关键词
Cognition; Emotion; Learning; Motivation; Multimodality; SOCIALLY SHARED REGULATION; CULTURAL-DIFFERENCES; SELF; PATTERNS; METAANALYSIS; CHALLENGES; ANALYTICS; CONTEXT;
D O I
10.1007/s10639-020-10229-w
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This systematic review on data modalities synthesises the research findings in terms of how to optimally use and combine such modalities when investigating cognitive, motivational, and emotional learning processes. ERIC, WoS, and ScienceDirect databases were searched with specific keywords and inclusion criteria for research on data modalities, resulting in 207 relevant publications. We provide findings in terms of target journal, country, subject, participant characteristics, educational level, foci, type of data modality, research method, type of learning, learning setting, and modalities used to study the different foci. In total, 18 data modalities were classified. For the 207 multimodal publications, 721 occurrences of modalities were observed. The most popular modality was interview followed by survey and observation. The least common modalities were heart rate variability, facial expression recognition, and screen recording. From the 207 publications, 98 focused exclusively on the cognitive aspects of learning, followed by 27 publications that only focused on motivation, while only five publications exclusively focused on emotional aspects. Only 10 publications focused on a combination of cognitive, motivational, and emotional aspects of learning. Our results plea for the increased use of objective measures, highlight the need for triangulation of objective and subjective data, and demand for more research on combining various aspects of learning. Further, rather than researching cognitive, motivational, and emotional aspects of learning separately, we encourage scholars to tap into multiple learning processes with multimodal data to derive a more comprehensive view on the phenomenon of learning.
引用
收藏
页码:5499 / 5547
页数:49
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]   An evaluation of multimodal interactions with technology while learning science concepts [J].
Anastopoulou, Stamatina ;
Sharples, Mike ;
Baber, Chris .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 42 (02) :266-290
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, P 3 INT C LEARN AN K, DOI [10.1145/2460296.2460316, DOI 10.1145/2460296.2460316]
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2003, 27 INT GROUP PSYCH M
[4]  
Azevedo R., 2017, Informational environments, P225, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-64274-1_10, 10.1007/978-3-319-64274-1_10]
[5]  
Azevedo R, 2017, HDB SELF REGULATION, V2, P254
[6]  
Azevedo R., 2011, Psychological Testing and Assessment Modeling, V53, P106
[7]   Analyzing Multimodal Multichannel Data about Self-Regulated Learning with Advanced Learning Technologies: Issues and Challenges [J].
Azevedo, Roger ;
Gasevic, Dragan .
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2019, 96 :207-210
[8]   Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective [J].
Bandura, A .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 52 :1-26
[9]   Process mining techniques for analysing patterns and strategies in students' self-regulated learning [J].
Bannert, Maria ;
Reimann, Peter ;
Sonnenberg, Christoph .
METACOGNITION AND LEARNING, 2014, 9 (02) :161-185
[10]  
Boyd CO, 2000, COMBINING QUALITATIV, V2, P454