Prediction of outcomes in trauma: Anatomic or physiologic parameters?

被引:46
作者
Guzzo, JL
Bochicchio, GV
Napolitano, LM
Malone, DL
Meyer, W
Scalea, TM
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Sch Med, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Ctr, Dept Surg, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
[2] Univ Maryland, Sch Med, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Ctr, Dept Epidemiol, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.07.013
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Prediction of outcomes after injury has traditionally incorporated measures of injury severity, but recent studies suggest that including physiologic and shock measures can improve accuracy of anatomic-based models. A recent single-institution study described a mortality predictive equation [f(x) = 3.48 - .22 (GCS) - .08 (BE) + .08 (Tx) + .05 (ISS) + .04 (Age)], where GSC is Glasgow Coma Score, BE is base excess, Tx is transfusion requirement, and ISS is Injury Severity Score, which had 63% sensitivity, 94% specificity, (receiver operating characteristic [ROC] 0.96), but did not provide comparative data for other models. We have previously documented that the Physiologic Trauma Score, including only physiologic variables (systemic inflammatory response syndrome, Glasgow Coma Score, age) also accurately predicts mortality in trauma. The objective of this study was to compare the predictive abilities of these statistical models in trauma outcomes. METHODS: Area under the ROC curve of sensitivity versus I-specificity was used to assess predictive ability and measured discrimination of the models. RESULTS: The study cohort consisted of 15,534 trauma patients (80% blunt mechanism) admitted to a Level I trauma center over a 3-year period (mean age 37 +/- 18 years; mean Injury Severity Score 10 - 10; mortality 4%). Sensitivity of the new predictive model was 45%, specificity was 96%, ROC was 0.91, validating this new trauma outcomes model in Our institution. This was comparable with area under the ROC for Revised Trauma Score (ROC 0.88), Trauma and Injury Severity Score (ROC 0.97), and Physiologic Trauma Score (ROC 0.95), but superior compared with admission Glasgow Coma Score (ROC 0.79), Injury Severity Score (ROC 0.79), and age (ROC 0.60). CONCLUSIONS: The predictive ability of this new model is superior to anatomic-based models such as Injury Severity Score, but comparable with other physiologic-based models such as Revised Trauma Score, Physiologic Trauma Score and Trauma, and Injury Severity Score.
引用
收藏
页码:891 / 897
页数:7
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   INJURY SEVERITY SCORE - METHOD FOR DESCRIBING PATIENTS WITH MULTIPLE INJURIES AND EVALUATING EMERGENCY CARE [J].
BAKER, SP ;
ONEILL, B ;
HADDON, W ;
LONG, WB .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1974, 14 (03) :187-196
[2]   THE DIFFERENTIAL SURVIVAL OF TRAUMA PATIENTS [J].
BAXT, WG ;
MOODY, P .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1987, 27 (06) :602-606
[3]   Improving the TRISS methodology by restructuring age categories and adding comorbidities [J].
Bergeron, E ;
Rossignol, M ;
Osler, T ;
Clas, D ;
Lavoie, A .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2004, 56 (04) :760-767
[4]   EVALUATING TRAUMA CARE - THE TRISS METHOD [J].
BOYD, CR ;
TOLSON, MA ;
COPES, WS .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1987, 27 (04) :370-378
[5]   A NEW CHARACTERIZATION OF INJURY SEVERITY [J].
CHAMPION, HR ;
COPES, WS ;
SACCO, WJ ;
LAWNICK, MM ;
BAIN, LW ;
GANN, DS ;
GENNARELLI, T ;
MACKENZIE, E ;
SCHWAITZBERG, S .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1990, 30 (05) :539-546
[6]   TRAUMA SCORE [J].
CHAMPION, HR ;
SACCO, WJ ;
CARNAZZO, AJ ;
COPES, W ;
FOUTY, WJ .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1981, 9 (09) :672-676
[7]   Improved predictions from a severity characterization of trauma (ASCOT) over trauma and injury severity score [TRISS]: Results of an independent evaluation [J].
Champion, HR ;
Copes, WS ;
Sacco, WJ ;
Frey, CF ;
Holcroft, JW ;
Hoyt, DB ;
Weigelt, JA .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1996, 40 (01) :42-48
[8]   A REVISION OF THE TRAUMA SCORE [J].
CHAMPION, HR ;
SACCO, WJ ;
COPES, WS ;
GANN, DS ;
GENNARELLI, TA ;
FLANAGAN, ME .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1989, 29 (05) :623-629
[9]   THE MAJOR TRAUMA OUTCOME STUDY - ESTABLISHING NATIONAL NORMS FOR TRAUMA CARE [J].
CHAMPION, HR ;
COPES, WS ;
SACCO, WJ ;
LAWNICK, MM ;
KEAST, SL ;
BAIN, LW ;
FLANAGAN, ME ;
FREY, CF .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1990, 30 (11) :1356-1365
[10]   Predicting outcome after multiple trauma: which scoring system? [J].
Chawda, MN ;
Hildebrand, F ;
Pape, HC ;
Giannoudis, PV .
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2004, 35 (04) :347-358