A comparison of individual and social time trade-off values for health states in the general population

被引:100
作者
Burström, K
Johannesson, M
Diderichsen, F
机构
[1] Karolinska Inst, Div Social Med, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, SE-17176 Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Stockholm Sch Econ, Ctr Hlth Econ, Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Univ Copenhagen, Inst Publ Hlth, Dept Social Med, Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
preferences; time trade-off; general population; health status; health-related quality of life; individual value; social value; EQ-5D; utility; visual analogue scale;
D O I
10.1016/j.healthpol.2005.06.011
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
This study aimed to compare directly elicited individual time trade-off (TTO) values in a general population sample with the social values derived using the UK EQ-5D index tariff. In the Stockholm County 1998 postal Public Health Survey (n = 4950, 20-88 years), the EQ-5D self-classifier, a TTO and a rating scale (RS) question were included (n = 2549 for all three questions). The mean TTO (EQ-5D) value was 0.943 (0.890) in the youngest age-group and 0.699 (0.733) in the oldest age-group. The difference between TTO and EQ-5D values was greater in more severe health status groups was. The same equation as for the UK EQ-5D index tariff was estimated for TTO and RS and resulted in significant and consistent coefficients for nearly all dimensions. The coefficients for moderate problems were closer to the EQ-5D index tariff than the coefficients for severe problems. Age was also significant after controlling for the EQ-5D dimensions (p < 0.05). The results suggest that individual and social TTO values differ systematically and that the difference is greater the more severe the health status is. The social EQ-5D index tariff may also underestimate the severity in health status at older ages; age appears to correlate with additional health problems not captured by the EQ-5D classification. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:359 / 370
页数:12
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], HLTH STATUS MEASUREM
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1991, STAT ANAL EPIDEMIOLO
[3]   A comparison of United Kingdom and Spanish general population time trade-off values for EQ-5D health states [J].
Badia, X ;
Roset, M ;
Herdman, M ;
Kind, P .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2001, 21 (01) :7-16
[4]   A Swedish population-based study on the relationship between the SF-36 and health utilities to measure health in hypertension [J].
Bardage, C ;
Isacson, D ;
Ring, L ;
Bingefors, K .
BLOOD PRESSURE, 2003, 12 (04) :203-210
[5]   Relationship between quality of life instruments, health state utilities, and willingness to pay in patients with asthma [J].
Blumenschein, K ;
Johannesson, M .
ANNALS OF ALLERGY ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY, 1998, 80 (02) :189-194
[6]   The relationship between descriptive and valuational quality-of-life measures in patients with intermittent claudication [J].
Bosch, JL ;
Hunink, MGM .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1996, 16 (03) :217-225
[7]   Swedish population health-related quality of life results using the EQ-5D [J].
Burström, K ;
Johannesson, M ;
Diderichsen, F .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2001, 10 (07) :621-635
[8]  
CLAES C, 1999, EUROQOL PLEN M 1998, P13
[9]   Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states [J].
Dolan, P .
MEDICAL CARE, 1997, 35 (11) :1095-1108
[10]  
Dolan P, 1996, HEALTH ECON, V5, P141, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(199603)5:2<141::AID-HEC189>3.0.CO