Review of Autologous Fat Grafting in Postmastectomy Reconstruction Patients: Nonroutine Diagnostics and Oncologic Safety

被引:2
|
作者
Sayyed, Adaah A. [1 ,2 ]
Perez-Alvarez, Idanis M. [3 ]
Singh, Tanvee [4 ]
King, Caroline A. [2 ]
Welschmeyer, Alexandra F. [5 ]
Bartholomew, Alexander J. [6 ]
Sher, Sarah [7 ]
Tousimis, Eleni A. [8 ]
Song, David H. [1 ]
Fan, Kenneth L. [1 ]
机构
[1] MedStar Georgetown Univ Hosp, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, 3800 Reservoir Rd NW, Washington, DC 20007 USA
[2] Georgetown Univ, Sch Med, Washington, DC USA
[3] Rush Univ, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Med Ctr, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[4] Columbia Univ, Dept Anesthesia, Irving Med Ctr, New York, NY USA
[5] Case Western Reserve Univ, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Univ Hosp Cleveland Med, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[6] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[7] MedStar Montgomery Med Ctr, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Olney, MD USA
[8] Cleveland Clin, Dept Breast Surg Oncol, Indian River Hosp, Vero Beach, FL USA
关键词
20-YEAR FOLLOW-UP; BREAST RECONSTRUCTION; CANCER; COMPLICATIONS; RECURRENCE; MASTECTOMY; OUTCOMES; TISSUE; RISK; RETENTION;
D O I
10.1097/GOX.0000000000004579
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Autologous fat grafting (FG) is increasingly used as an adjunctive reconstruction technique to augment volume, achieve symmetry, and improve contour deformities. This study aims to characterize the oncologic and surgical safety of FG in women undergoing autologous breast reconstruction (ABR) or implant-based reconstruction (IBR). Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed for all patients undergoing FG at a multi-site single health system between 2015 to 2018. A total of 228 eligible breasts from 155 patients were identified using Current Procedural Terminology codes. Patients were divided by reconstructive technique. Bivariate analyses compared baseline characteristics and post-FG outcomes. Results: Mean age for patients undergoing ABR (129 breasts) was 52.8 years compared to 48.6 years for those undergoing IBR (99 breasts; P = 0.002). A heavier volume of fat was grafted per ABR breast (143.8mL) than per IBR breast (102.2mL; P = 0.002). Forty-seven (20.6%) breasts required FG revision, more frequently in ABR breasts (31.0%) than IBR breasts (7.1%; P < 0.001). Following FG, 17.5% of patients experienced a palpable mass, and 18.9% of breasts underwent nonroutine diagnostics or procedures, with no difference between ABR and IBR groups. Most biopsies noted benign findings such as fat necrosis (2.2%) or a benign mass (0.9%), with recurrence only noted in two patients (0.9%). Mean follow-up was 20.4 months. Conclusion: FG is a safe, surgically simple procedure more commonly performed in ABR breasts. FG use in ABR and IBR breasts is oncologically safe, with no impairment in breast surveillance and low rates of locoregional recurrence, but possibly increased incidence of nonroutine imaging and biopsies.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Autologous fat grafting in breast reconstruction: implications for follow-up and surveillance
    Hanson, Summer E.
    Kapur, Sahil K.
    Hwang, Rosa F.
    Dryden, Mark S.
    GLAND SURGERY, 2021, 10 (01) : 487 - 493
  • [22] Outcomes of Autologous Fat Grafting in Mastectomy Patients Following Breast Reconstruction
    Upadhyaya, Siddhi N.
    Bernard, Steven L.
    Grobmyer, Stephen R.
    Yanda, Courtney
    Tu, Chao
    Valente, Stephanie A.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 25 (10) : 3052 - 3056
  • [23] Oncologic Safety of Autologous Fat Grafting after Breast Cancer Surgical Treatment: A Matched Cohort Study
    Tukiama, Ricardo
    Vieira, Rene A. C.
    Facina, Gil
    Leal, Plinio da Cunha
    Zucca-Matthes, Gustavo
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2021, 148 (01) : 11 - 20
  • [24] Reply: On the Safety of Autologous Fat Grafting for Breast Reconstruction
    Petit, Jean Yves
    De Lorenzi, Francesca
    Lohsiriwat, Visnu
    Rietjens, Mario
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2012, 130 (01) : 208E - 208E
  • [25] The Safety of Fat Grafting: An Institutional Retrospective Review
    Fang, Hua Amanda
    Soto, Edgar
    Pigg, Ricky
    Smith, Metta
    Boyd, Carter J.
    Ananthasekar, Shivani
    Fix, R. Jobe
    Kilic, Ali
    Denney, Brad
    Patcha, Prasanth
    Myers, Rene P.
    de la Torre, Jorge, I
    Collawn, Sherry
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2022, 88 (05) : S473 - S477
  • [26] Donor site complications and satisfaction in autologous fat grafting for breast reconstruction: A systematic review
    Wederfoort, Jamilla L. M.
    Hebels, Sophie A.
    Heuts, Esther M.
    van der Hulst, Rene R. W. J.
    Piatkowski, Andrzej A.
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2022, 75 (04) : 1316 - 1327
  • [27] The Third Postmastectomy Reconstruction Option-Autologous Fat Transfer
    Khouri, Kimberly S.
    Khouri, Roger K., Jr.
    Khouri, Roger K.
    JAMA SURGERY, 2019, 154 (01) : 63 - 64
  • [28] Autologous fat grafting in the face and neck: Multinational trends and knowledge of the safety, applications, and indications considering oncologic risk potential
    Fiedler, Lukas S.
    Saleh, Daniel B.
    Mukrowsky, Alicia
    LARYNGOSCOPE INVESTIGATIVE OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2021, 6 (05): : 1024 - 1030
  • [29] Breast-Conserving Surgery with Immediate Autologous Fat Grafting Reconstruction: Oncologic Outcomes
    Jorge Villanova Biazus
    Camile Cesa Stumpf
    Marcia Portela Melo
    Angela Erguy Zucatto
    Rodrigo Cericatto
    Jose Antonio Cavalheiro
    Andrea Pires Damin
    Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 2018, 42 : 1195 - 1201
  • [30] Autologous fat grafting for postoperative breast reconstruction: A systemic review
    Yu, Wenxin
    Wang, Zhenghui
    Dai, Yuhan
    Zhao, Shuhan
    Chen, Huilin
    Wang, Shui
    Xie, Hui
    REGENERATIVE THERAPY, 2024, 26 : 1010 - 1017