Sesame allergy threshold dose distribution

被引:25
作者
Dano, D. [1 ,2 ]
Remington, B. C. [3 ]
Astier, C. [1 ]
Baumert, J. L. [4 ]
Kruizinga, A. G. [3 ]
Bihain, B. E. [2 ]
Taylor, S. L. [4 ]
Kanny, G. [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Lorraine Univ, Lab Med Hydrol & Climatol, Fac Med, EA 7299, Nancy, France
[2] Genclis SAS, Vandoeuvre Les Nancy, France
[3] Netherlands Org Appl Sci Res TNO, NL-3704 HE Zeist, Netherlands
[4] Univ Nebraska, Dept Food Sci & Technol, Food Allergy Res & Resource Program, Lincoln, NE 68583 USA
[5] Univ Hosp, Internal Med Clin Immunol & Allergol, Nancy, France
关键词
Allergy; Dose distribution; Modelling; Sesame; Threshold; ORAL FOOD CHALLENGES; RISK-ASSESSMENT; DOUBLE-BLIND; ANAPHYLAXIS; SEED; SENSITIZATION; PEANUT; TESTS; LIFE;
D O I
10.1016/j.fct.2015.05.011
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
Background: Sesame is a relevant food allergen in France. Compared to other allergens there is a lack of food challenge data and more data could help sesame allergy risk management. The aim of this study is to collect more sesame challenge data and investigate the most efficient food challenge method for future studies. Method: Records of patients at University Hospital in Nancy (France) with objective symptoms to sesame challenges were collected and combined with previously published data. An estimation of the sesame allergy population threshold was calculated based on individual NOAELs and LOAELs. Clinical dosing schemes at Nancy were investigated to see if the optimal protocol for sesame is currently used. Results: Fourteen patients (10 M/4 F, 22 +/- 14.85 years old) with objective symptoms were added to previously published data making a total of 35 sesame allergic patients. The most sensitive patient reacted to the first dose at challenge of 1.02 mg sesame protein. The ED05 ranges between 1.2 and 4.0 mg of sesame protein (Log-Normal, Log-Logistic, and Weibull models) and the ED10 between 4.2 and 6.2 mg. The optimal food challenge dosing scheme for sesame follows semi-log dose increases from 0.3 to 3000 mg protein. Conclusion: This article provides a valuable update to the existing clinical literature regarding sesame NOAELs and LOAELs. Establishment of a population threshold for sesame could help in increasing the credibility of precautionary labelling and decrease the costs associated with unexpected allergic reactions. Also, the use of an optimal dosing scheme would decrease time spent on diagnostic and thereafter on the economic burden of sesame allergy diagnosis. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:48 / 53
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Predictive value of skin prick tests using recombinant allergens for diagnosis of peanut allergy [J].
Astier, Catherine ;
Morisset, Martine ;
Roitel, Olivier ;
Codreanu, Fanny ;
Jacquenet, Sandrine ;
Franck, Patricia ;
Ogier, Virginie ;
Petit, Nicolas ;
Proust, Barbara ;
Moneret-Vautrin, Denise-Anne ;
Burks, A. Wesley ;
Bihain, Bernard ;
Sampson, Hugh A. ;
Kanny, Gisele .
JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2006, 118 (01) :250-256
[2]   Can we determine a threshold level for allergenic foods by statistical analysis of published data in the literature? [J].
Bindslev-Jensen, C ;
Briggs, D ;
Osterballe, M .
ALLERGY, 2002, 57 (08) :741-746
[3]  
Buchanan R, 2008, J FOOD PROTECT, V71, P1043
[4]   Sesame food allergy and sensitization in children: the natural history and long-term follow-up [J].
Cohen, Adi ;
Goldberg, Michael ;
Levy, Batia ;
Leshno, Moshe ;
Katz, Yitzhak .
PEDIATRIC ALLERGY AND IMMUNOLOGY, 2007, 18 (03) :217-223
[5]   Hazard characterisation in food allergen risk assessment: The application of statistical approaches and the use of clinical data [J].
Crevel, R. W. R. ;
Briggs, D. ;
Hefle, S. L. ;
Knulst, A. C. ;
Taylor, S. L. .
FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY, 2007, 45 (05) :691-701
[6]   Sesame allergy in Britain: A questionnaire survey of members of the Anaphylaxis Campaign [J].
Derby, CJ ;
Gowland, MH ;
Hourihane, JO .
PEDIATRIC ALLERGY AND IMMUNOLOGY, 2005, 16 (02) :171-175
[7]   Food allergy population thresholds: An evaluation of the number of oral food challenges and dosing schemes on the accuracy of threshold dose distribution modeling [J].
Entink, Rinke H. Klein ;
Remington, Benjamin C. ;
Blom, W. Marty ;
Rubingh, Carina M. ;
Kruizinga, Astrid G. ;
Baumert, Joseph L. ;
Taylor, Steve L. ;
Houben, Geert F. .
FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY, 2014, 70 :134-143
[8]   The economic costs of severe anaphylaxis in France:: an inquiry carried out by the Allergy Vigilance Network [J].
Flabbee, J. ;
Petit, N. ;
Jay, N. ;
Guenard, L. ;
Codreanu, F. ;
Mazeyrat, R. ;
Kanny, G. ;
Moneret-Vautrin, D. A. .
ALLERGY, 2008, 63 (03) :360-365
[9]   Comparison of international food allergen labeling regulations [J].
Gendel, Steven M. .
REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2012, 63 (02) :279-285
[10]   Advances in the risk management of unintended presence of allergenic foods in manufactured food products - An overview [J].
Hattersley, Sue ;
Ward, Rachel ;
Baka, Athanasia ;
Crevel, Rene W. R. .
FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY, 2014, 67 :255-261