Performance assessment of a V-trough photovoltaic system and prediction of power output with different machine learning algorithms

被引:62
作者
Agbulut, Umit [1 ]
Gurel, Ali Etem [1 ]
Ergun, Alper [2 ]
Ceylan, Ilhan [2 ]
机构
[1] Duzce Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Fac Technol, TR-81620 Duzce, Turkey
[2] Karabuk Univ, Dept Energy Syst Engn, Fac Technol, TR-78050 Karabuk, Turkey
关键词
Cleaner production; Concentrator; CPV; Machine learning algorithms; Power prediction; V-trough; SOLAR; DESIGN; CONCENTRATOR; DEGRADATION; MODULES; ENERGY; ANN;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122269
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study carried out in two stages. In the first stage, four different-sized layers were designed and manufactured for a concentrated photovoltaic system. These layers were used to change the concentration ratio and area ratio of the system. Furthermore, a new power coefficient equation with this paper is proposed to the literature for the determination of the system performance. In the second stage of the study, the power outputs measured in the study were predicted with four machine-learning algorithms, namely support vector machine, artificial neural network, kernel and nearest-neighbor, and deep learning. To evaluate the success of these machine learning algorithms, coefficient of determination (R-2), root mean squared error (RMSE), mean bias error (MBE), t-statistics (t-stat) and mean absolute bias error (MABE) have been discussed in the paper. The experimental results demonstrated that the double-layer application for the concentrator has ensured better results and enhanced the power by 16%. The average concentration ratio for the double-layer was calculated to be 1.8. Based on these data, the optimum area ratio was determined to be 9 for this V-trough concentrator. Furthermore, the power coefficient was calculated to be 1.35 for optimum area ratio value. R-2 of all algorithms is bigger than 0.96. Support vector machine algorithm has generally presented better prediction results particularly with very satisfying R-2, RMSE, MBE, and MABE of 0.9921, 0.7082 W, 0.3357 W, and 0.6238 W, respectively. Then it is closely followed by kernel-nearest neighbor, artificial neural network, and deep learning algorithms, respectively. In conclusion, this paper is reporting that the proposed new power coefficient approach is giving more reliable results than efficiency data and the power output data of concentrated photovoltaic systems can be highly predicted with the machine learning algorithms. (c) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 58 条
[41]  
Najafabadi MM., 2015, Journal of big data, V2, P1
[42]   Assessment of forecasting techniques for solar power production with no exogenous inputs [J].
Pedro, Hugo T. C. ;
Coimbra, Carlos F. M. .
SOLAR ENERGY, 2012, 86 (07) :2017-2028
[43]   A hybrid method for forecasting the energy output of photovoltaic systems [J].
Ramsami, Pamela ;
Oree, Vishwamitra .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2015, 95 :406-413
[44]   Maximum power output prediction of HCPV FLATCON® module using an ANN approach [J].
Said, Mohamed Islam ;
Steiner, Marc ;
Siefer, Gerald ;
Arab, Amar Hadj .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2020, 152 :1274-1283
[45]   Investigating the role of fuel injection pressure change on performance characteristics of a DI-CI engine fuelled with methyl ester [J].
Sandemir, Suat ;
Gurel, Ali Etem ;
Agbulut, Umit ;
Bakan, Faruk .
FUEL, 2020, 271
[46]   Performance enhancement of a Building-Integrated Concentrating Photovoltaic system using phase change material [J].
Sharma, Shivangi ;
Tahir, Asif ;
Reddy, K. S. ;
Mallick, Tapas K. .
SOLAR ENERGY MATERIALS AND SOLAR CELLS, 2016, 149 :29-39
[47]   DETAILED BALANCE LIMIT OF EFFICIENCY OF P-N JUNCTION SOLAR CELLS [J].
SHOCKLEY, W ;
QUEISSER, HJ .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS, 1961, 32 (03) :510-&
[48]   A comprehensive study of dense-array concentrator photovoltaic system using non-imaging planar concentrator [J].
Siaw, Fei-Lu ;
Chong, Kok-Keong ;
Wong, Chee-Woon .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2014, 62 :542-555
[49]   Solar Forecasting using ANN with Fuzzy Logic Pre-processing [J].
Sivaneasan, B. ;
Yu, C. Y. ;
Goh, K. P. .
LEVERAGING ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES AND POLICY OPTIONS FOR LOW CARBON CITIES, 2017, 143 :727-732
[50]   Can movable PCM-filled TES units be used to improve the performance of PV panels? Overview and experimental case-study [J].
Soares, N. ;
Costa, J. J. ;
Gaspar, A. R. ;
Matias, T. ;
Simoes, P. N. ;
Duraes, L. .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2020, 210