The impact of students and curriculum on self-study during clinical training in medical school: a multilevel approach

被引:12
作者
Barbosa, J. [1 ]
Silva, A. [2 ]
Ferreira, M. A. [1 ]
Severo, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Porto, Dept Simulat & Med Educ, Fac Med, Al Prof Hernani Monteiro, P-4200319 Oporto, Portugal
[2] Univ Porto, Inst Biomed Sci Abel Salazar, Undergrad Educ Dept, Oporto, Portugal
来源
BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION | 2017年 / 17卷
关键词
Clinical training; Curriculum design; Medical students; Self-directed learning; Self-study; TIME SPENT; WORKLOAD; SKILLS; PERCEPTIONS;
D O I
10.1186/s12909-016-0846-3
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Background: In higher education, the focus has shifted from the acquisition of knowledge to learning objectives and skills. This means that, the majority of student learning time is spent independently working outside the classroom. Students take an active role in setting goals, deciding how to achieve them, and planning individual study time. Although extensive research has recognized the importance of curriculum and students' characteristics in time devoted to self-study, it is still unclear to what extent these variables affect time to study. Due to the growing reliance on self-directed learning in medical education, and in an attempt to elucidate this issue, this research aims to evaluate self-study time during clinical training and assess whether this is more influenced by the student or the curriculum. Methods: A questionnaire was given to 1220 medical students (43.3% of the enrolled students). The students were asked to indicate the average number of study hours per week beyond the time allocated to classes for each clerkship (rotation) attended. Variation and generalizability of students' self-study were estimated using linear mixed models. Results: Findings showed that the intrinsic differences within students were a greater source of variation in self-study time than differences within clerkships (56.0% vs. 6.9%). If the amount of self-study dedicated to an individual clerkship is to be determined, at least 32 students are needed to achieve acceptable reliability. However, this data with two clerkships per student can used to retrospectively measure the self-study reported by students in clinical training. Conclusions: The findings suggest that, both, curriculum and student characteristics influence self-study in undergraduate clinical training. Indeed, students' characteristics play a significant role in time devoted to study. Further research should be undertaken to investigate students' characteristics that may predict self-study during undergraduate medical training.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 7
页数:7
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Exploring factors affecting undergraduate medical students' study strategies in the clinical years: a qualitative study
    Al Kadri, Hanan M. F.
    Al-Moamary, Mohamed S.
    Elzubair, Margaret
    Magzoub, Mohi Eldien
    AlMutairi, Abdulrahman
    Roberts, Christopher
    van der Vleuten, Cees
    [J]. ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2011, 16 (05) : 553 - 567
  • [2] WORKLOAD AND THE QUALITY OF STUDENT LEARNING
    CHAMBERS, E
    [J]. STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 1992, 17 (02) : 141 - 153
  • [3] Chambers E., 1994, Materials production in open and distance learning, P103
  • [4] Field of Study and Students' Workload in Higher Education Ireland and Austria in Comparative Perspective
    Darmody, Merike
    Smyth, Emer
    Unger, Martin
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE SOCIOLOGY, 2008, 49 (4-5) : 329 - 346
  • [5] Dolmans DHJM, 2001, MED TEACH, V23, P471
  • [6] Learning physical examination skills outside timetabled training sessions: what happens and why?
    Duvivier, Robbert J.
    van Geel, Koos
    van Dalen, Jan
    Scherpbier, Albert J. J. A.
    van der Vleuten, Cees P. M.
    [J]. ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2012, 17 (03) : 339 - 355
  • [7] Gijselaers W.H., 1995, Educational Research and Evaluation, V1, P183
  • [8] The influence of the curriculum organization on study progress in higher education
    Jansen, EPWA
    [J]. HIGHER EDUCATION, 2004, 47 (04) : 411 - 435
  • [9] Karjalainen A., 2006, Give me time to think: Determining student workload in higher education
  • [10] An examination of the interrelationships between workload, study time, learning approaches and academic outcomes
    Kember, D
    Ng, S
    Tse, H
    Wong, ETT
    Pomfret, M
    [J]. STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 1996, 21 (03) : 347 - 358