Acid mine drainage attenuation by inhibition of pyrite bioleaching using limestone and olive pomace

被引:5
作者
Pagnanelli, F. [1 ]
Viggi, C. Cruz [1 ]
Toro, L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Roma La Sapienza, Dept Chem, I-00185 Rome, Italy
关键词
acid mine drainage; iron oxidising bacteria; bioleaching; pyrite; limestone; olive pomace; HEAVY-METAL REMOVAL; BACTERIA; IRON; FERROOXIDANS; BIOSORPTION; MECHANISM;
D O I
10.1080/02757540.2011.651128
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The control and inhibition of pyrite bioleaching involved in the generation of acid mine drainage was studied. Inhibition of pyrite bioleaching was performed by varying the pyrite concentration in the medium (substrate inhibition) and/or by addition of limestone (inhibition by pH increase) and olive pomace (inhibition by organic compounds). Inhibition tests of pyrite bioleaching were performed according to a full factorial design with three factors (pyrite, limestone and olive pomace) taken at two levels. Preliminary pyrite bioleaching tests showed the ability of the available inoculum to oxidise the mineral. Subsequently, experimental data for total soluble iron denoted strong inhibition under all the different operating conditions of the factorial design, except when larger pyrite concentrations were used. In particular, inhibition by limestone was due to the increase in pH which negatively affects microorganisms, while inhibition by olive pomace may be related to the antioxidant properties of polyphenols. Interactions among operating conditions were specifically assessed by analysis of variance. Only limestone and/or pomace addition resulted in a significant (95%) diminution of iron extraction.
引用
收藏
页码:293 / 303
页数:11
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Acid Mine Drainage (AMD): causes, treatment and case studies [J].
Akcil, Ata ;
Koldas, Soner .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2006, 14 (12-13) :1139-1145
[2]   Rehabilitation options for inland waterways impacted by sulfidic sediments - A synthesis [J].
Baldwin, Darren S. ;
Fraser, Mark .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2009, 91 (02) :311-319
[3]   Treatment of acid mine drainage by sulphate-reducing bacteria using low cost matrices [J].
Costa, M. C. ;
Martins, M. ;
Jesus, C. ;
Duarte, J. C. .
WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION, 2008, 189 (1-4) :149-162
[4]  
Crundwell F.K., 1997, BIOELECTR BIOENERG, V43, P112
[5]   Biotreatment and bioassessment of heavy metal removal by sulphate reducing bacteria in fixed bed reactors [J].
Cruz Viggi, C. ;
Pagnanelli, F. ;
Cibati, A. ;
Uccelletti, D. ;
Palleschi, C. ;
Toro, L. .
WATER RESEARCH, 2010, 44 (01) :151-158
[6]  
Danilewicz JC, 2010, AM J ENOL VITICULT, V61, P166
[7]   Acid rock drainage formation and treatment: a review [J].
Egiebor, Nosa O. ;
Oni, Ben .
ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2007, 2 (01) :47-62
[8]   Attachment of acidophilic bacteria to solid surfaces: The significance of species and strain variations [J].
Ghauri, M. Afzal ;
Okibe, Naoko ;
Johnson, D. Barrie .
HYDROMETALLURGY, 2007, 85 (2-4) :72-80
[9]   Treatment of acid sulfate soil drainage by direct application of alkaline reagents [J].
Green, R. ;
Waite, T. D. ;
Melville, M. D. .
WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION, 2007, 178 (1-4) :59-68
[10]   Acid mine drainage remediation options: a review [J].
Johnson, DB ;
Hallberg, KB .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2005, 338 (1-2) :3-14