Litigating with or against other groups? The influence of inter-organisational relations on legal mobilisation in Europe

被引:2
作者
Lejeune, Aude [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lille, Natl Ctr Sci Res CNRS, CERAPS, 1 Pl Deliot, F-59064 Lille, France
关键词
Belgium; Discrimination; Employment; Labour systems; Law and politics; Sweden; LAW; ENFORCEMENT; DISCRIMINATION; PARTICIPATION; EUROLEGALISM; STRATEGIES; EQUALITY; IDENTITY; IRELAND; RIGHTS;
D O I
10.1057/s41295-020-00212-7
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
The role of the courts in European politics has generated scholarly debate. This article aims to explore how organisations turn to the courts in different countries, and how legal mobilisation varies from one context to another. It explores in particular how equality agencies in Sweden and Belgium address disputes involving employment discrimination in their domestic courts. Based on interviews with legal officers, combined with the analysis of anti-discrimination case law, this study reveals that, alongside political opportunities, legal opportunities, resources, and identity, legal mobilisation is also shaped by inter-organisational relations, and on two levels: when the EU directives were transposed into national law and when legal agents from different organisations interact with each other. Beside the attention paid to inter-organisational relations, this paper argues that comparative research should focus not only on the volume of litigation but also on the significance that legal agents give to litigation in different contexts.
引用
收藏
页码:840 / 857
页数:18
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]   Explaining variation in the use of European litigation strategies - European community law and British gender equality policy [J].
Alter, KJ ;
Vargas, J .
COMPARATIVE POLITICAL STUDIES, 2000, 33 (04) :452-482
[2]  
Andersen EllenAnn., 2006, OUT CLOSETS COURTS L
[3]   Hiding in Plain Sight: Pseudonymity and Participation in Legal Mobilization [J].
Arrington, Celeste L. .
COMPARATIVE POLITICAL STUDIES, 2019, 52 (02) :310-341
[4]  
Banakar R., 2004, Human rights brought home: socio-legal perspectives on human rights in the national context, P165
[5]   The other face of Eurolegalism: The multifaceted convergence of national enforcement styles [J].
Bastings, Lincey ;
Mastenbroek, Ellen ;
Versluis, Esther .
REGULATION & GOVERNANCE, 2017, 11 (03) :299-314
[6]   Participation through law enforcement -: The case of the European Union [J].
Börzel, TA .
COMPARATIVE POLITICAL STUDIES, 2006, 39 (01) :128-152
[7]  
Carlson L, 2013, SCAND STUD, V58, P75
[8]  
Case RE, 2010, JCMS-J COMMON MARK S, V48, P221
[9]  
Cichowski RA, 2007, THEME EUR GOVERN, P1, DOI 10.2277/ 0521671817
[10]   Litigating within relationships: Disputes and disturbance in the regulatory process [J].
Coglianese, C .
LAW & SOCIETY REVIEW, 1996, 30 (04) :735-765