Payment Innovations To Improve Diagnostic Accuracy And Reduce Diagnostic Error

被引:12
作者
Berenson, Robert [1 ]
Singh, Hardeep [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Urban Inst, Washington, DC 20037 USA
[2] Baylor Coll Med, Hlth Policy Qual & Informat Program, Ctr Innovat Qual Effectiveness & Safety, Michael & DeBakey Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Baylor Coll Med, Med, Houston, TX 77030 USA
基金
美国医疗保健研究与质量局;
关键词
MISSED OPPORTUNITIES; CANCER-DIAGNOSIS; CARE; FREQUENCY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1377/hlthaff.2018.0714
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Diagnostic accuracy is essential for treatment decisions but is largely unaccounted for by payers, including in fee-for-service Medicare and proposed Alternative Payment Models (APMs). We discuss three payment-related approaches to reducing diagnostic error. First, coding changes in the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule could facilitate the more effective use of teamwork and information technology in the diagnostic process and better support the cognitive work and time commitment that physicians make in the quest for diagnostic accuracy, especially in difficult or uncertain cases. Second, new APMs could be developed to focus on improving diagnostic accuracy in challenging cases and make available support resources for diagnosis, including condition-specific centers of diagnostic expertise or general diagnostic centers of excellence that provide second (or even third) opinions. Performing quality improvement activities that promote safer diagnosis should be a part of the accountability of APM recipients. Third, the accuracy of diagnoses that trigger APM payments and establish payment amounts should be confirmed by APM recipients. Implementation of these multipronged approaches can make current payment models more accountable for addressing diagnostic error and position diagnostic performance as a critical component of quality-based payment.
引用
收藏
页码:1828 / 1835
页数:8
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, TEAM STEPPS
[2]  
Alternative Payment Model Framework and Progress Tracking (APM FPT) Work Group, 2016, ALT PAYM MOD APM FRA
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2016, J PATIENT SAF
[4]   Redefining Hypertension - Assessing the New Blood-Pressure Guidelines [J].
Bakris, George ;
Sorrentino, Matthew .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2018, 378 (06) :497-499
[5]   Diastolic heart failure: Neglected or misdiagnosed? [J].
Banerjee, P ;
Banerjee, T ;
Khand, A ;
Clark, AL ;
Cleland, JGF .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2002, 39 (01) :138-141
[6]   THE EFFECT OF PHYSICIAN BEHAVIOR ON THE COLLECTION OF DATA [J].
BECKMAN, HB ;
FRANKEL, RM .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1984, 101 (05) :692-696
[7]  
Berenson R.A., 2016, Payment methods: How they work
[8]  
Berenson RA, 2018, HLTH AFFAIRS BLOG
[9]   Revisiting E&M Visit Guidelines - A Missing Piece of Payment Reform [J].
Berenson, Robert A. ;
Basch, Peter ;
Sussex, Amanda .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2011, 364 (20) :1892-1895
[10]  
Burton R, 2017, MED EVOLVING APPROAC