Interactive group decision making procedure under incomplete information

被引:301
作者
Kim, SH
Ahn, BS
机构
[1] Korea Adv Inst Sci & Technol, Grad Sch Management, Seoul 130012, South Korea
[2] Suwon Univ, Dept Business Adm & Accounting, Whasung 445743, Kyonggi, South Korea
关键词
decision theory; group preference aggregation; incomplete information; preference strength;
D O I
10.1016/S0377-2217(98)00040-X
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This paper deals with multiple criteria decision making problem with incomplete information when multiple decision makers (Multiple Criteria Group Decision Making: MCGDM) are involved. Usually decision makers (DMs) are willing or able to provide only incomplete information, because of time pressure, lack of knowledge or data, and their limited expertise related with problem domain. There have been just a few studies considering incomplete information in group settings. This incompletely specified information constructs region of linear constraints and therefore, pairwise dominance relationship between alternatives reduces to intractable nonlinear programmings. Hence, to handle this difficulty, we suggest a method, utilizing individual decision results to form group consensus. Final group consensus ranking toward more agreement of participants can be built through solving a series of linear programmings, using individual decision results under group members' possibly different weight constraints. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:498 / 507
页数:10
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   A MULTIAGENT MULTIATTRIBUTE APPROACH FOR CONFLICT-RESOLUTION IN ACID-RAIN IMPACT MITIGATION [J].
ANANDALINGAM, G .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS, 1989, 19 (05) :1142-1153
[2]   HOW TO SELECT AND HOW TO RANK PROJECTS - THE PROMETHEE METHOD [J].
BRANS, JP ;
VINCKE, P ;
MARESCHAL, B .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1986, 24 (02) :228-238
[3]  
CHIN J, 1994, CLIN PERINATOL, V21, P1, DOI 10.1016/0305-0548(94)90057-4
[4]  
Cook W.D., 1978, MANAGE SCI, V24, P1721, DOI DOI 10.1287/MNSC.24.16.1721
[5]  
Goicoechea A., 1982, Multiobjective Decision Analysis with Engineering and Business Applications
[6]   OBTAINING NONDOMINATED PRIORITY VECTORS FOR MULTIPLE OBJECTIVE DECISION-MAKING PROBLEMS WITH DIFFERENT COMBINATIONS OF CARDINAL AND ORDINAL INFORMATION [J].
HANNAN, EL .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS, 1981, 11 (08) :538-543
[7]   PARTIAL INFORMATION, DOMINANCE, AND POTENTIAL OPTIMALITY IN MULTIATTRIBUTE UTILITY-THEORY [J].
HAZEN, GB .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 1986, 34 (02) :296-310
[8]   GROUP DECISION-MAKING - SUPPOSITIONS AND PRACTICE [J].
ISLEI, G ;
LOCKETT, G .
SOCIO-ECONOMIC PLANNING SCIENCES, 1991, 25 (01) :67-81
[9]   ASSESSING A SET OF ADDITIVE UTILITY-FUNCTIONS FOR MULTICRITERIA DECISION-MAKING, THE UTA METHOD [J].
JACQUETLAGREZE, E ;
SISKOS, J .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1982, 10 (02) :151-164
[10]  
Kahneman D, 1982, Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases