Brain death

被引:17
作者
Beresford, HR
机构
[1] Cornell Univ, Sch Law, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
[2] Univ Rochester, Sch Med, Dept Neurol, Rochester, NY USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0733-8619(05)70132-8
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Current law in the United States authorizes physicians to diagnose brain death by applying generally accepted neurologic criteria for determining loss of function of the entire brain. This article offers a medical-legal perspective on problems that may arise with respect to the determination of brain death. These include the possibility of diagnostic error, conceptual disagreements that may constrain the use of neurologic criteria to diagnose death, and the conflation of brain death and loss of consciousness. This article also addresses legal aspects of the debate over whether to expand the definition of brain death to include permanent unconsciousness. Although existing laws draw a clear distinction between brain death and the persistent vegetative state, many courts have authorized removal of life support from individuals whose unconsciousness is believed to be permanent on proof that removal accords with preferences expressed before sentience was lost.
引用
收藏
页码:295 / +
页数:13
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1989, NEUROLOGY, V39, P125
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1990, JAMA, V263, P426
[3]  
ASHWAL S, 1994, NEW ENGL J MED, V330, P1499
[4]  
ASHWAL S, 1994, NEW ENGL J MED, V330, P1572
[5]   LEGAL-ASPECTS OF TERMINATION OF TREATMENT DECISIONS [J].
BERESFORD, HR .
NEUROLOGIC CLINICS, 1989, 7 (04) :775-787
[6]   QUINLAN DECISION - PROBLEMS AND LEGISLATIVE ALTERNATIVES [J].
BERESFORD, HR .
ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY, 1977, 2 (01) :74-81
[7]  
BERESFORD HR, 1982, NY LAW REV, V27, P1273
[8]  
BERESFORD HR, 1996, ETHICS NEUROSCIENCE, P7
[9]   Late improvement in consciousness after post-traumatic - Brief report [J].
Childs, NL ;
Mercer, WN .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 334 (01) :24-25
[10]  
JENNETT B, 1972, LANCET, V1, P734