Similarity of stream width distributions across headwater systems

被引:86
作者
Allen, George H. [1 ]
Pavelsky, Tamlin M. [1 ]
Barefoot, Eric A. [1 ,6 ]
Lamb, Michael P. [2 ]
Butman, David [3 ,4 ]
Tashie, Arik [1 ]
Gleason, Colin J. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ North Carolina Chapel Hill, Dept Geol Sci, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] CALTECH, Div Geol & Planetary Sci, Pasadena, CA 91125 USA
[3] Univ Washington, Sch Environm & Forest Sci, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[4] Univ Washington, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[5] Univ Massachusetts, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Amherst, MA 01003 USA
[6] Rice Univ, Dept Earth Sci, Houston, TX 77005 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
CHANNEL GEOMETRY; CARBON-DIOXIDE; HYPORHEIC ZONE; NETWORKS; EXCHANGE; SIZE; AREA; EMISSIONS; ABUNDANCE; DISCHARGE;
D O I
10.1038/s41467-018-02991-w
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The morphology and abundance of streams control the rates of hydraulic and biogeochemical exchange between streams, groundwater, and the atmosphere. In large river systems, the relationship between river width and abundance is fractal, such that narrow rivers are proportionally more common than wider rivers. However, in headwater systems, where many biogeochemical reactions are most rapid, the relationship between stream width and abundance is unknown. To constrain this uncertainty, we surveyed stream hydromorphology (wetted width and length) in several headwater stream networks across North America and New Zealand. Here, we find a strikingly consistent lognormal statistical distribution of stream width, including a characteristic most abundant stream width of 32 +/- 7 cm independent of discharge or physiographic conditions. We propose a hydromorphic model that can be used to more accurately estimate the hydromorphology of streams, with significant impact on the understanding of the hydraulic, ecological, and biogeochemical functions of stream networks.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]   Patterns of river width and surface area revealed by the satellite-derived North American River Width data set [J].
Allen, George H. ;
Pavelsky, Tamlin M. .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2015, 42 (02) :395-402
[2]   Lithologic and tectonic controls on bedrock channel form at the northwest Himalayan front [J].
Allen, George H. ;
Barnes, Jason B. ;
Pavelsky, Tamlin M. ;
Kirby, Eric .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-EARTH SURFACE, 2013, 118 (03) :1806-1825
[3]   Width of streams and rivers in response to vegetation, bank material, and other factors [J].
Anderson, RJ ;
Bledsoe, BR ;
Hession, WC .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 2004, 40 (05) :1159-1172
[4]  
Barnes H.H., 1967, Roughness characteristics of natural channels (Water Supply Paper 1849), DOI DOI 10.3133/WSP1849
[5]   Rethinking hyporheic flow and transient storage to advance understanding of stream-catchment connections [J].
Bencala, Kenneth E. ;
Gooseff, Michael N. ;
Kimball, Briant A. .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2011, 47
[6]   An expanded role for river networks [J].
Benstead, Jonathan P. ;
Leigh, David S. .
NATURE GEOSCIENCE, 2012, 5 (10) :678-679
[7]   Manning's formula and Strickler's scaling explained by a co-spectral budget model [J].
Bonetti, S. ;
Manoli, G. ;
Manes, C. ;
Porporato, A. ;
Katul, G. G. .
JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 2017, 812 :1189-1212
[8]   Aquatic carbon cycling in the conterminous United States and implications for terrestrial carbon accounting [J].
Butman, David ;
Stackpoole, Sarah ;
Stets, Edward ;
McDonald, Cory P. ;
Clow, David W. ;
Striegl, Robert G. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2016, 113 (01) :58-63
[9]  
Butman D, 2011, NAT GEOSCI, V4, P839, DOI [10.1038/ngeo1294, 10.1038/NGEO1294]
[10]  
Chow V. T., 1959, OPEN CHANNEL HYDRAUL