A Review of Open and Endovascular Treatment of Superior Vena Cava Syndrome of Benign Aetiology

被引:57
作者
Sfyroeras, G. S. [1 ]
Antonopoulos, C. N. [1 ]
Mantas, G. [1 ]
Moulakakis, K. G. [1 ]
Kakisis, J. D. [1 ]
Brountzos, E. [2 ]
Lattimer, C. R. [3 ]
Geroulakos, G. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Natl & Kapodistrian Univ Athens, Attikon Univ Hosp, Dept Vasc Surg, Sch Med, Athens, Greece
[2] Natl & Kapodistrian Univ Athens, Attikon Univ Hosp, Lab Radiol 2, Sch Med, Athens, Greece
[3] Imperial Coll, Dept Surg & Canc, London, England
关键词
Superior vena cava syndrome; Thrombosis; Obstruction; Endovascular treatment; Surgical treatment; MANAGEMENT; STENOSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejvs.2016.11.013
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The widespread use of central venous catheters, ports, pacemakers, and defibrillators has increased the incidence of benign superior vena cava syndrome (SVCS). This study aimed at reviewing the results of open and endovascular treatment of SVCS. Method: Medical literature databases were searched for relevant studies. Studies with more than five adult patients, reporting separate results for the SVC were included. Nine studies reported the results of endovascular treatment of SVCS including 136 patients followed up for a mean of 11-48 months. Causes of SVCS were central venous catheters and pacemakers (80.6%), mediastinal fibrosis (13.7%), and other (5.6%). Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and stenting was performed in 73.6%, PTA only in 17.3%, and thrombolysis, PTA, and stenting in 9%. Four studies reported the results of open repair of SVCS including 87 patients followed up between 30 months and 10.9 years. The causes were mediastinal fibrosis (58.4%), catheters and pacemakers (28.5%), and other (13%). Operations performed included a spiral saphenous interposition graft, other vein graft, PTFE graft, and human allograft. Thirteen patients required re-operations (15%) before discharge mainly for graft thrombosis. Results: In the endovascular group technical success was 95.6%. Thirty day mortality was 0%. Regression of symptoms was reported in 97.3%. Thirty-two patients (26.9%) underwent 58 secondary procedures. In the open group the 30 day mortality was 0%. Symptom regression was reported in 93.5%. Twenty-four patients (28.4%) underwent a total of 33 secondary procedures. Conclusions: Endovascular is the first line treatment for SVCS caused by intravenous devices, whereas surgery is most often performed for mediastinal fibrosis. Both treatments show good results regarding regression of the symptoms and mid-term primary patency, with a significant incidence of secondary interventions. (C) 2016 European Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:238 / 254
页数:17
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
Akoglu Hadim, 2007, Hemodial Int, V11, P385, DOI 10.1111/j.1542-4758.2007.00205.x
[2]   Reconstruction of the superior vena cava: Benefits of postoperative surveillance and secondary endovascular interventions [J].
Alimi, YS ;
Gloviczki, P ;
Vrtiska, TJ ;
Pairolero, PC ;
Canton, LG ;
Bower, TC ;
Harmsen, WS ;
Hallett, JW ;
Cherry, KJ ;
Stanson, AW .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 1998, 27 (02) :287-299
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1994, Kendalls Advanced Theory of Statistics, Volume I: Distribution Theory
[4]   Percutaneous treatment of superior vena cava syndrome using metallic stents [J].
Ariza, MAD ;
Gamboa, P ;
Gimeno, MJ ;
Alfonso, E ;
Mainar, A ;
Medrano, J ;
López-Marin, P ;
Tobio, R ;
Herrera, M .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2003, 13 (04) :853-862
[5]   Superior vena cava syndrome induced by endocardial defibrillator and pacemaker leads [J].
Aryana, Arash ;
Sobota, Kristi D. ;
Esterbrooks, Dennis J. ;
Gelbman, Andrew I. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2007, 99 (12) :1765-1767
[6]   Percutaneous stenting of supyerior vena cava syndrome: Treatment outcome in patients with benign and malignant etiology [J].
Barshes, Neal R. ;
Annambhotla, Suman ;
El Sayed, Hosam F. ;
Huynh, Tam T. ;
Kougias, Panagiotis ;
Dardik, Alan ;
Lin, Peter H. .
VASCULAR, 2007, 15 (05) :314-321
[7]   Central Venous Stenosis Associated with Pacemaker Leads: Short-Term Results of Endovascular Interventions [J].
Borsato, Garry W. ;
Rajan, Dheeraj K. ;
Simons, Martin E. ;
Sniderman, Kenneth W. ;
Tan, Kong T. .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2012, 23 (03) :363-367
[8]   Percutaneous treatment for pacemaker-associated superior vena cava syndrome [J].
Chan, AW ;
Bhatt, DL ;
Wilkoff, BL ;
Roffi, M ;
Mukherjee, D ;
Gray, BH ;
Baizer, CT ;
Yadav, JS .
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2002, 25 (11) :1628-1633
[9]   Superior vena cava obstruction: Bypass using spiral vein graft [J].
Doty, JR ;
Flores, JH ;
Doty, DB .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 1999, 67 (04) :1111-1116
[10]   Outcome and Management of Pacemaker-Induced Superior Vena Cava Syndrome [J].
Fu, Hai-Xia ;
Huang, Xin-Miao ;
Zhong, Li ;
Osborn, Michael J. ;
Bjarnason, Haraldur ;
Mulpuru, Siva ;
Zhao, Xian-Xian ;
Friedman, Paul A. ;
Cha, Yong-Mei .
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2014, 37 (11) :1470-1476