Feature Integration Theory Revisited: Dissociating Feature Detection and Attentional Guidance in Visual Search

被引:39
作者
Chan, Louis K. H. [1 ]
Hayward, William G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hong Kong, Dept Psychol, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
salience map; dimension-based attention; feature integration theory; visual search; POP-OUT TARGETS; RESPONSE SELECTION PROCESSES; SINGLETON FEATURE TARGETS; PERCEPTUAL SELECTIVITY; TOP-DOWN; GUIDED SEARCH; FORMS; STIMULUS; CAPTURE; DIMENSIONS;
D O I
10.1037/0096-1523.35.1.119
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
In feature integration theory (FIT; A. Treisman & S. Sato, 1990), feature detection is driven by independent dimensional modules, and other searches are driven by a master map of locations that integrates dimensional information into salience signals. Although recent theoretical models have largely abandoned this distinction. some observed results are difficult to explain in its absence. The present study measured dimension-specific performance during detection and localization, task,; that require operation of dimensional modules and the master map, respectively. Results showed a dissociation between tasks in terms of both dimension-switching costs and cross-dimension attentional capture, reflecting a dimension-specific nature for detection tasks and a dimension-general nature for localization tasks. In a feature-discrimination task. results precluded an explanation based on response mode. These results are interpreted to support FIT's postulation that different mechanisms are involved in parallel and focal attention searches. This indicates that the FIT architecture should be adopted to explain the current results and that a variety of visual attention findings can be addressed within this framework.
引用
收藏
页码:119 / 132
页数:14
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   OVERRIDING STIMULUS-DRIVEN ATTENTIONAL CAPTURE [J].
BACON, WF ;
EGETH, HE .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1994, 55 (05) :485-496
[2]   The size of an attentional window modulates attentional capture by color singletons [J].
Belopolsky, Artem V. ;
Zwaan, Laura ;
Theeuwes, Jan ;
Kramer, Arthur F. .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2007, 14 (05) :934-938
[3]   The FeatureGate model of visual selection [J].
Cave, KR .
PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH-PSYCHOLOGISCHE FORSCHUNG, 1999, 62 (2-3) :182-194
[4]  
Cohen A, 2002, ATTENTION PERFORM, V19, P587
[5]   Perceptual dimensional constraints in response selection processes [J].
Cohen, A ;
Shoup, R .
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 32 (02) :128-181
[6]   Intra- and cross-dimensional visual search for single-feature targets [J].
Cohen, A ;
Magen, H .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1999, 61 (02) :291-307
[7]   Response selection processes for conjunctive targets [J].
Cohen, A ;
Shoup, R .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2000, 26 (01) :391-411
[8]   VISUAL-SEARCH AND STIMULUS SIMILARITY [J].
DUNCAN, J ;
HUMPHREYS, GW .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1989, 96 (03) :433-458
[9]   BEYOND THE SEARCH SURFACE - VISUAL-SEARCH AND ATTENTIONAL ENGAGEMENT [J].
DUNCAN, J ;
HUMPHREYS, G .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1992, 18 (02) :578-588
[10]  
Duncan J., 1985, Attention and performance, VXI., P85