Finite Element Analysis of the Stresses Induced by One- Piece and Two-Piece Dental Implants Supporting All-on-4 Implant-Supported Prostheses

被引:2
作者
El Homossany, Mahmoud El-Moutassim Bellah [1 ]
Askar, Mohamed Gamal [2 ]
Mohamed, Ahmed Mostafa Abdelfattah [1 ]
机构
[1] Ain Shams Univ, Oral & Maxilofacial Prosthodont Dept, Fac Dent, Org African Unity St, Cairo 11561, Egypt
[2] Helwan Univ, Dept Mech, Fac Engn, Cairo, Egypt
关键词
All-on-4; biomechanics; finite element analysis; one-piece dental implant; screw-retained prosthesis; BIOMECHANICAL EVALUATION; BONE; ABUTMENT; SCREW; PERFORMANCE; LEVEL; CROWN;
D O I
10.11607/jomi.9353
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: To find out the difference in the stresses induced by one-piece monophasic and two-piece dental implants supporting All-on-4 implant-supported prostheses using finite element analysis. Materials and Methods: Two finite element maxillary models were designed: In the two-piece model, two-piece dental implants were used, and in the onepiece model, one-piece dental implants were used. The dental implants were placed according to the All-on-4 treatment concept. The anterior implants were axially placed; however, the posterior implants were placed with a distal inclination of 15 degrees. In each model, the prosthetic superstructure was designed to be a titanium implant prosthesis with zirconia crowns. Three loading scenarios were applied in this study. The first scenario simulated biting function with a total load of 250 N. The second scenario simulated incision function in which 90-N horizontal static load was applied to the palatal surface of central incisors. The third scenario simulated biting in the presence of a cantilever. Results: In the three loading scenarios, the stresses were higher in the two-piece model. Higher stress values were recorded posteriorly rather than anteriorly in both models. Conclusion: One-piece dental implants induce lower stress values compared with two-piece dental implants when used in All-on-4 implant-supported prostheses.
引用
收藏
页码:763 / 770
页数:8
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] Biomechanical comparison of the All-on-4, M-4, and V-4 techniques in an atrophic maxilla: A 3D finite element analysis
    Ayali, Aysa
    Altagar, Mazen
    Ozan, Oguz
    Kurtulmus-Yilmaz, Sevcan
    [J]. COMPUTERS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2020, 123
  • [2] Effect of framework material and vertical misfit on stress distribution in implant-supported partial prosthesis under load application: 3-D finite element analysis
    Bacchi, Atais
    Xediek Consani, Rafael Leonardo
    Mesquita, Marcelo Ferraz
    Fernandes dos Santos, Mateus Bertolini
    [J]. ACTA ODONTOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2013, 71 (05) : 1243 - 1249
  • [3] Bassit R, 2002, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V17, P17
  • [4] Comparison between all-on-four and all-on-six treatment concepts and framework material on stress distribution in atrophic maxilla: A prototyping guided 3D-FEA study
    Brilhante Bhering, Claudia Lopes
    Mesquita, Marcelo Ferraz
    Kemmoku, Daniel Takanori
    Noritomi, Pedro Yoshito
    Xediek Consani, Rafael Leonardo
    Ricardo Barao, Valentim Adelino
    [J]. MATERIALS SCIENCE & ENGINEERING C-MATERIALS FOR BIOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2016, 69 : 715 - 725
  • [5] Force transmission of one- and two-piece morse-taper oral implants:: a nonlinear finite element analysis
    Çehreli, MC
    Akça, K
    Iplikçioglu, H
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2004, 15 (04) : 481 - 489
  • [6] Volumetric osseous changes in the completely edentulous maxilla after sinus grafting and lateral bone augmentation: a systematic review
    Coopman, R.
    Fennis, J.
    Ghaeminia, H.
    Van de Vyvere, G.
    Politis, C.
    Hoppenreijs, T. J. M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2020, 49 (11) : 1470 - 1480
  • [7] Comparative Finite Element Analysis of Short Implants with Different Treatment Approaches in the Atrophic Mandible
    Doganay, Ozge
    Kilic, Erdem
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2020, 35 (04) : E69 - E76
  • [8] Randomized controlled clinical trial comparing one-piece and two-piece dental implants supporting fixed and removable dental prostheses: 4-to 6-year observations
    Gamper, Felix B.
    Benic, Goran I.
    Sanz-Martin, Ignacio
    Asgeirsson, Asgeir G.
    Haemmerle, Christoph H. F.
    Thoma, Daniel S.
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2017, 28 (12) : 1553 - 1559
  • [9] Bone Response From a Dynamic Stimulus on a One-Piece and Multi-Piece Implant Abutment and Crown by Finite Element Analysis
    Hajimiragha, Habib
    Abolbashari, Mohammadreza
    Nokar, Saeed
    Abolbashari, AmirHossein
    Abolbashari, Mehrdad
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2014, 40 (05) : 525 - 532
  • [10] A Systematic Review of Screw versus Cement-Retained Fixed Implant Supported Reconstructions
    Hamed, Mohamed Tharwat
    Mously, Hisham Abdullah
    Alamoudi, Saeed Khalid
    Hashem, Abou Bakr Hossam
    Naguib, Ghada Hussein
    [J]. CLINICAL COSMETIC AND INVESTIGATIONAL DENTISTRY, 2020, 12 : 9 - 16