Does pregnancy affect vascular enhancement in patients undergoing CT pulmonary angiography?

被引:42
作者
Andreou, Adrian K. [1 ,2 ]
Curtin, John J. [2 ]
Wilde, Sue [2 ]
Clark, Allan [3 ]
机构
[1] Radiol Acad, Cotman Ctr, Norwich NR4 7UB, Norfolk, England
[2] Norfolk & Norwich Univ, Hosp NHS Trust, Norwich NR4 7UY, Norfolk, England
[3] Univ E Anglia, Sch Med Hlth Policy & Practice, Norwich NR4 7TJ, Norfolk, England
关键词
Pregnancy; Pulmonary embolism; CT pulmonary angiography;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-008-1114-7
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to evaluate whether pregnancy affects contrast enhancement within the pulmonary arteries during computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA). This was a retrospective analysis of the CTPA examinations of 16 pregnant and 16 non-pregnant female patients, suspected of having an acute pulmonary embolus (PE), during the same time period. Pulmonary vascular enhancement was evaluated by measuring the CT density within the pulmonary arteries. In a blinded evaluation, subjective grading of contrast enhancement within the pulmonary arteries was also performed. There was a significant difference in arterial enhancement between the two groups, with pregnant patients having a mean pulmonary arterial density 112 HU less than patients in the control group [mean attenuation of 259.79 +/- 59.31 HU in pregnant patients versus 371.88 +/- 60.63 HU in non-pregnant patients (p < 0.001)]. The mean subjective pulmonary arterial enhancement score in the pregnant group was 8.19 +/- 2.51 versus 13.69 +/- 3.07 in the control group (p < 0.001). Pregnant women undergoing CTPA have significantly decreased pulmonary arterial enhancement compared to non-pregnant patients, probably due to the increase in cardiac output in pregnancy. We may need to reconsider how we perform CTPA in this group in order to ensure adequate opacification for diagnosis.
引用
收藏
页码:2716 / 2722
页数:7
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   CT pulmonary angiography and CT venography: Factors associated with vessel enhancement [J].
Arakawa, Hiroaki ;
Kohno, Tatsuo ;
Hiki, Taro ;
Kaji, Yasushi .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2007, 189 (01) :156-161
[2]  
ATRASH HK, 1992, CURR OPIN OBSTET GYN, V4, P61
[3]   Peak contrast enhancement in CT and MR angiography: When does it occur and why? Pharmacokinetic study in a porcine model [J].
Bae, KT .
RADIOLOGY, 2003, 227 (03) :809-816
[4]   Aortic and hepatic contrast medium enhancement at CT part II. Effect of reduced cardiac output in a porcine model [J].
Bae, KT ;
Heiken, JP ;
Brink, JA .
RADIOLOGY, 1998, 207 (03) :657-662
[5]   Effect of patient weight and scanning duration on contrast enhancement during pulmonary multidetector CT angiography [J].
Bae, Kyongtae T. ;
Tao, Cheng ;
Gurel, Safiye ;
Hong, Cheng ;
Zhu, Fang ;
Gebke, Todd A. ;
Milite, Margherita ;
Hildebolt, Charles F. .
RADIOLOGY, 2007, 242 (02) :582-589
[6]   How we manage venous thromboembolism during pregnancy [J].
Bates, SM ;
Ginsberg, JS .
BLOOD, 2002, 100 (10) :3470-3478
[7]  
BERNSTEIN MJ, 1986, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V256, P744
[8]   Pulmonary embolism revealed on helical CT angiography: Comparison with ventilation-perfusion radionuclide lung scanning [J].
Blachere, H ;
Latrabe, V ;
Montaudon, M ;
Valli, N ;
Couffinhal, T ;
Raherisson, C ;
Leccia, F ;
Laurent, F .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2000, 174 (04) :1041-1047
[9]   Pulmonary embolus pregnant patients: Survey of ventilation-perfusion imaging policies and practices [J].
Boiselle, PM ;
Reddy, SS ;
Villas, PA ;
Liu, A ;
Seibyl, JP .
RADIOLOGY, 1998, 207 (01) :201-206
[10]   CARDIOVASCULAR CHANGES IN EARLY PHASE OF PREGNANCY [J].
CAPELESS, EL ;
CLAPP, JF .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1989, 161 (06) :1449-1453