International Test Commission guidelines for test adaptation: A criterion checklist

被引:206
作者
Hernandez, Ana [1 ]
Dolores Hidalgo, Maria [2 ]
Hambleton, Ronald K. [3 ]
Gomez-Benito, Juana [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Valencia, Valencia, Spain
[2] Univ Murcia, Murcia, Spain
[3] Univ Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA USA
[4] Univ Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
关键词
Test translation; test adaptation; guidelines; International Test Commission; evaluative checklist; QUALITY;
D O I
10.7334/psicothema2019.306
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Background: To improve the quality of test translation and adaptation, and hence the comparability of scores across cultures, the International Test Commission (ITC) proposed a number of guidelines for the adaptation process. Although these guidelines are well-known, they are not implemented as often as they should be. One possible reason for this is the broad scope of the guidelines, which makes them difficult to apply in practice. The goal of this study was therefore to draw up an evaluative criterion checklist that would help test adapters to implement the ITC recommendations and which would serve as a model for assessing the quality of test adaptations. Method: Each ITC guideline was operationalized through a number of criteria. For each criterion, acceptable and excellent levels of accomplishment were proposed. The initial checklist was then reviewed by a panel of 12 experts in testing and test adaptation. The resulting checklist was applied to two different tests by two pairs of independent reviewers. Results: The final evaluative checklist consisted of 29 criteria covering all phases of test adaptation: planning, development, confirmation, administration, score interpretation, and documentation. Conclusions: We believe that the proposed evaluative checklist will help to improve the quality of test adaptation.
引用
收藏
页码:390 / 398
页数:9
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
American Educational Research Association American Psychological Association National Council on Measurement in Education Joint Committee on Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing, 2014, issues, strategies, and testing standards, V2014th ed.
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2017, The ITC guidelines for translating and adapting tests, V2nd
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2005, ADAPTING ED PSYCHOL, DOI DOI 10.4324/9781410611758
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1999, STAND ED PSYCH TEST
[5]   The Spanish version of the Job Crafting Scale [J].
Bakker, Arnold B. ;
Ficapal-Cusi, Pilar ;
Torrent-Sellens, Joan ;
Boada-Grau, Joan ;
Hontangas-Beltran, Pedro M. .
PSICOTHEMA, 2018, 30 (01) :136-142
[6]  
Buela-Casal G., 2015, Cuestionario de ansiedad estadorasgo: Adaptacin espaola, V9th
[7]  
Duarte ME, 2008, INTERNATIONAL HANDBOOK OF CAREER GUIDANCE, P489, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4020-6230-8_24
[8]   A review of guidelines for cross-cultural adaptation of questionnaires could not bring out a consensus [J].
Epstein, Jonathan ;
Santo, Ruth Miyuki ;
Guillemina, Francis .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2015, 68 (04) :435-441
[9]   Assessing the quality of tests: Revision of the EFPA review model [J].
Evers, Arne ;
Muniz, Jose ;
Hagemeister, Carmen ;
Hstmaelingen, Andreas ;
Lindley, Patricia ;
Sjoberg, Anders ;
Bartram, Dave .
PSICOTHEMA, 2013, 25 (03) :283-291
[10]   ITC Guidelines for Translating and Adapting Tests (Second Edition) [J].
Gregoire, Jacques .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TESTING, 2018, 18 (02) :101-134