Reducing the negative appendectomy rate with the laparoscopic appendicitis score; a multicenter prospective cohort and validation study

被引:12
作者
Gelpke, Koen [1 ]
Hamminga, Jenneke T. H. [1 ]
van Bastelaar, James J. [2 ,3 ]
de Vos, Bart [4 ]
Bodegom, Maarten E. [5 ]
Heineman, Erik [1 ]
Hofker, H. Sijbrand [1 ]
El Moumni, Mostafa [1 ]
Haveman, Jan Willem [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Surg, Hanzepl 1, NL-9700 RB Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Zuyderland Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Sittard Geleen, Netherlands
[3] Zuyderland Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Heerlen, Netherlands
[4] Wilhelmina Gasthuis, Dept Surg, Assen, Netherlands
[5] Bethesda Hosp, Dept Surg, Hoogeveen, Netherlands
关键词
Appendicitis; Appendectomy; Laparoscopy; Score; Evaluation; DIAGNOSTIC LAPAROSCOPY; ALVARADO SCORE; SURGICAL-CARE; OUTCOMES; MANAGEMENT; IMPACT; COMPLICATIONS; GUIDELINE; MORBIDITY; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.04.041
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Approximately nine percent of all acute appendectomies are unintentionally performed on a normal appendix. Failure of treatment (negative appendectomy or missed appendicitis) is associated with higher morbidity and mortality when compared to appendectomy for uncomplicated appendicitis. The Laparoscopic APPendicitis (LAPP) score was developed in order to systematically evaluate the appendix for the presence of inflammation. This study aims to determine whether the LAPP score reduces the negative appendectomy rate without missing appendicitis. Methods: From September 2013 through May 2016, 322 adult patients presenting with a clinical suspicion of acute appendicitis and an indication for diagnostic laparoscopy were included and analyzed in this multicenter prospective validation study. Depending on the LAPP score, the appendix was either removed (n = 300) or left in situ (n = 22). These patients were compared to a historical control group of 584 patients treated at the same hospitals. The appendix was examined by a pathologist and the negative appendectomy rate was calculated. Results: The negative appendectomy rate was significantly lower when the LAPP score was used (4,7% vs. 8,4%; P = 0,034). None of the patients with a negative LAPP score, in which the appendix remained in situ, developed acute appendicitis within three months. There were no significant differences in operation time, complications, or readmissions. Using the LAPP score was associated with significantly higher rates of preoperative radiological imaging (98% vs. 70%; P < 0,001). After adjusting for covariables, including radiological imaging, use of the LAPP score led to fewer treatment failures when compared to not using the LAPP score (OR: 0,48, 95% C.I. 0,251 to 0,914; P = 0,025). Conclusion: The LAPP score is a safe and simple tool to reduce the negative appendectomy rate during laparoscopic surgery without missing cases of acute appendicitis.
引用
收藏
页码:257 / 264
页数:8
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] Augmenting the decision making process in acute appendicitis: A retrospective cohort study
    Abdelhalim, M. A.
    Stuart, J. D. A.
    Nicholson, G. A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2015, 17 : 5 - 9
  • [2] STROCSS 2019 Guideline: Strengthening the reporting of cohort studies in surgery
    Agha, Riaz
    Abdall-Razak, Ali
    Crossley, Eleanor
    Dowlut, Naeem
    Iosifidis, Christos
    Mathew, Ginimol
    Beamishaj
    Bashashati, Mohammad
    Millham, Frederick H.
    Orgill, Dennis P.
    Noureldin, Ashraf
    James, Iain
    Alsawadi, Abdulrahman
    Bradley, Patrick J.
    Giordano, Salvatore
    Laskin, Daniel M.
    Basu, Somprakas
    Johnston, Maximilian
    Muensterer, Oliver J.
    Mukherjee, Indraneil
    Chi-Yong, James Ngu
    Valmasoni, Michele
    Pagano, Duilio
    Vasudevan, Baskaran
    Rosin, Richard David
    McCaul, James Anthony
    Albrecht, Jorg
    Hoffman, Jerome R.
    Thorat, Mangesh A.
    Massarut, Samuele
    Thoma, Achilles
    Kirshtein, Boris
    Afifi, Raafat Yahia
    Farooq, Naheed
    Challacombe, Ben
    Pai, Prathamesh S.
    Perakath, Benjamin
    Kadioglu, Huseyin
    Aronson, Jeffrey K.
    Raveendran, Kandiah
    Machado-Aranda, David
    Klappenbach, Roberto
    Healy, Donagh
    Miguel, Diana
    Leles, Claudio Rodrigues
    Ather, M. Hammad
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 72 : 156 - 165
  • [3] A PRACTICAL SCORE FOR THE EARLY DIAGNOSIS OF ACUTE APPENDICITIS
    ALVARADO, A
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1986, 15 (05) : 557 - 564
  • [4] Short and Long-Term Mortality After Appendectomy in Sweden 1987 to 2006. Influence of Appendectomy Diagnosis, Sex, Age, Co-morbidity, Surgical Method, Hospital Volume, and Time Period. A National Population-Based Cohort Study
    Andersson, Roland E.
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2013, 37 (05) : 974 - 981
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2008, DIAGN HISTOPATHOL, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.MPDHP.2007.12.002
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2017, WORLD J EMERG SURG, DOI DOI 10.1186/S13017-017-0141-6
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2010, NED TIJDSCHR GENEES
  • [8] Multicentre observational study of performance variation in provision and outcome of emergency appendicectomy
    Bhangu, A.
    Richardson, C.
    Torrance, A.
    Pinkney, T.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2013, 100 (09) : 1240 - 1252
  • [9] Less negative appendectomies due to imaging in patients with suspected appendicitis
    Boonstra, P. A.
    van Veen, R. N.
    Stockmann, H. B. A. C.
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2015, 29 (08): : 2365 - 2370
  • [10] Carr N., 2000, ANN DIAGN PATHOL, V4, P46, DOI DOI 10.1053/ADPA.2000.0046